{"title":"Service regime and patters of innovation in services","authors":"Y. C. Chang, M. Chen","doi":"10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops a concept of service regime that governs patterns of innovation in services. Based on a synthesis approach, a service regime composed of four dimensions and ten elements is proposed. A dataset of 311 service firms in Taiwan was collected through a postal questionnaire survey. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis reveal a new innovation taxonomy of four service clusters: innovation laggards, process-organizational centric innovators, product-business model centric innovators, and customer involvement centric innovators. We conclude that these four service innovation clusters are service regime-specific, but less sector-specific. The service regime provides deeper insights for managing service firms and theoretical implications for managing innovation in services.","PeriodicalId":329450,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper develops a concept of service regime that governs patterns of innovation in services. Based on a synthesis approach, a service regime composed of four dimensions and ten elements is proposed. A dataset of 311 service firms in Taiwan was collected through a postal questionnaire survey. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis reveal a new innovation taxonomy of four service clusters: innovation laggards, process-organizational centric innovators, product-business model centric innovators, and customer involvement centric innovators. We conclude that these four service innovation clusters are service regime-specific, but less sector-specific. The service regime provides deeper insights for managing service firms and theoretical implications for managing innovation in services.