Management of Atrophic Mandibular Fractures in Pakistan – Changing Trends with Preference to Extra-Oral Approach

Kirn Zulfiqar, A. Chatha, Saman Chaudhary
{"title":"Management of Atrophic Mandibular Fractures in Pakistan – Changing Trends with Preference to Extra-Oral Approach","authors":"Kirn Zulfiqar, A. Chatha, Saman Chaudhary","doi":"10.29054/APMC/2020.1117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: With the ever-increasing incidence of facial trauma in geriatric population, it is very important to improve the care given to these patients. This study has been focused on determining a better approach for management of atrophic mandibular fractures.  Objective: To compare the frequency of complications of extra-oral versus intra-oral approach for the management of atrophic mandible fractures. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Settings: Outdoor patient of department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore Pakistan. Duration: One year, 20th January, 2018 till 20th January, 2019. Methodology: Seventy consecutive patients were included in this study from the OPD of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. All the patients were randomly assorted in the both groups, group A being the intra-oral approach and group B being the extra-oral approach. The outcome was determined on the basis of presence or absence of mal-union or non-union after the fractures were treated. Results: The mean age of cases in extra and intra oral group was 76.54±8.13 years and 73.66± 8.04 years. In extra-oral group, there were 21(60%) male and 14(40%) females and in intra-oral group, there were 25(71/4%) male and 10(28.6%) female cases. In extra –oral group 3(8.6%) cases had complication and in intra-oral group 2(5.7%) cases had complications, the frequency of complication in both groups, p-value >0.05. Among complications in extra-oral group 2(5.7%) cases had non-union and 1(2.9%) had malunion and in intra-oral group 1(2.9%) cases had non-union and malunion each. The frequency of type of complication was statistically same in both group, p-value >0.05.  Conclusion: The incidence of complications is statistically same in both groups. Hence, we encourage the use of extra-oral approach for management of atrophic fractures of mandible.","PeriodicalId":319424,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Punjab Medical College","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Punjab Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29054/APMC/2020.1117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the ever-increasing incidence of facial trauma in geriatric population, it is very important to improve the care given to these patients. This study has been focused on determining a better approach for management of atrophic mandibular fractures.  Objective: To compare the frequency of complications of extra-oral versus intra-oral approach for the management of atrophic mandible fractures. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Settings: Outdoor patient of department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore Pakistan. Duration: One year, 20th January, 2018 till 20th January, 2019. Methodology: Seventy consecutive patients were included in this study from the OPD of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. All the patients were randomly assorted in the both groups, group A being the intra-oral approach and group B being the extra-oral approach. The outcome was determined on the basis of presence or absence of mal-union or non-union after the fractures were treated. Results: The mean age of cases in extra and intra oral group was 76.54±8.13 years and 73.66± 8.04 years. In extra-oral group, there were 21(60%) male and 14(40%) females and in intra-oral group, there were 25(71/4%) male and 10(28.6%) female cases. In extra –oral group 3(8.6%) cases had complication and in intra-oral group 2(5.7%) cases had complications, the frequency of complication in both groups, p-value >0.05. Among complications in extra-oral group 2(5.7%) cases had non-union and 1(2.9%) had malunion and in intra-oral group 1(2.9%) cases had non-union and malunion each. The frequency of type of complication was statistically same in both group, p-value >0.05.  Conclusion: The incidence of complications is statistically same in both groups. Hence, we encourage the use of extra-oral approach for management of atrophic fractures of mandible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦萎缩性下颌骨骨折的治疗-倾向于口外入路的变化趋势
背景:随着老年人群面部创伤发生率的不断增加,提高对这些患者的护理非常重要。本研究的重点是确定一种更好的方法来治疗萎缩性下颌骨骨折。目的:比较口腔外入路与口腔内入路治疗萎缩性下颌骨骨折并发症的发生率。研究设计:随机对照试验。环境:巴基斯坦拉合尔梅奥医院口腔颌面外科门诊患者。活动时间:1年,2018年1月20日至2019年1月20日。方法:本研究纳入了口腔颌面外科门诊连续70例患者。所有患者随机分为两组,A组为口内入路,B组为口外入路。结果是根据骨折治疗后是否存在不愈合或不愈合来确定的。结果:口腔外组和口腔内组患者的平均年龄分别为76.54±8.13岁和73.66±8.04岁。口腔外组男性21例(60%),女性14例(40%);口腔内组男性25例(71/4%),女性10例(28.6%)。口腔外组3出现并发症(8.6%),口腔内组2出现并发症(5.7%),两组并发症发生率比较,p值>0.05。并发症中,口腔外组2例(5.7%)出现骨不连,1例(2.9%)出现骨不连,口腔内组1例(2.9%)出现骨不连和骨不连。两组并发症类型发生频率差异有统计学意义,p值均>0.05。结论:两组患者并发症发生率无统计学差异。因此,我们鼓励使用口外入路治疗下颌骨萎缩性骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Success Rate of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Between Women with Lower Segment Uterine Scar Thickness more than and less than 3.5mm Circumcision; A Comparative Study Between ZACH Self-Locking Clamp & Bone Cutter Comparison of Early and Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis Mean Lipid Profile among Patients Suffering from Oral Sub-mucous Fibrosis Reporting in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Karachi, Pakistan: A Descriptive Study Peril Elements of Infection Severity, Disease Non-Improvement, Case Fatality and Management of Sars-Cov-2 in Sargodha Region Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1