{"title":"Tannhäuser réhabilité (VI) – « La Quatrième » devant la presse parisienne – le snobisme et l’enthousiasme","authors":"M. Mrozowicki","doi":"10.4467/23538953ce.21.041.15191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"« La quatrième »’s image in the parisian press – the snobbery and the enthusiasm\n\nThe greatest star of the Parisian Tannhäuser’s performances in 1895 was Ernest Van Dyck in the title role. According to the Parisian press this production of Wagner’s work owed its success mainly to this Belgian tenor. However after his departure from Paris, and after some other changes of the cast that took place rather rapidly (still in the summer 1895), the performances’ artistic level hasn’t decreased in a significant way, and the work, played continuously until December 15th, 1913, was always highly appreciated by the French audience. Were the enthusiastic reactions of the Parisian public at the turn of the XIXth and XXth centuries to Wagner’s Tannhäuser and his other operas and musical dramas sincere and spontaneous? What was the part of the snobbery in Wagner’s reception in France during La Belle Époque? That was the question asked by some French journalists (Heugel, Maret, Doumic, Coppée and others). The author of the article recalls Georges Rodenbach’s Solomonic answer to this question presented in his text Tannhäuser et le snobisme.","PeriodicalId":133418,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers ERTA","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers ERTA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953ce.21.041.15191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
« La quatrième »’s image in the parisian press – the snobbery and the enthusiasm
The greatest star of the Parisian Tannhäuser’s performances in 1895 was Ernest Van Dyck in the title role. According to the Parisian press this production of Wagner’s work owed its success mainly to this Belgian tenor. However after his departure from Paris, and after some other changes of the cast that took place rather rapidly (still in the summer 1895), the performances’ artistic level hasn’t decreased in a significant way, and the work, played continuously until December 15th, 1913, was always highly appreciated by the French audience. Were the enthusiastic reactions of the Parisian public at the turn of the XIXth and XXth centuries to Wagner’s Tannhäuser and his other operas and musical dramas sincere and spontaneous? What was the part of the snobbery in Wagner’s reception in France during La Belle Époque? That was the question asked by some French journalists (Heugel, Maret, Doumic, Coppée and others). The author of the article recalls Georges Rodenbach’s Solomonic answer to this question presented in his text Tannhäuser et le snobisme.
《四分之一》在巴黎新闻界的形象——势利和热情1895年巴黎人Tannhäuser演出中最伟大的明星是欧内斯特·范·戴克饰演的主角。据巴黎媒体报道,瓦格纳作品的成功主要归功于这位比利时男高音。然而,在他离开巴黎之后,在演员阵容发生了一些迅速的变化之后(仍然是在1895年夏天),演出的艺术水平并没有明显下降,这部作品一直持续到1913年12月15日,一直受到法国观众的高度赞赏。19世纪和20世纪初,巴黎公众对瓦格纳的Tannhäuser和他的其他歌剧和音乐剧的热情反应是真诚和自发的吗?在《美丽Époque》期间,瓦格纳在法国受到的欢迎中,势利的部分是什么?这是一些法国记者(Heugel, Maret, Doumic, coppsame等)提出的问题。这篇文章的作者回忆起乔治·罗登巴赫在他的文章Tannhäuser et le snobisme中对这个问题的所罗门式回答。