International Examination and Synthesis of the Primary and Secondary Surveys in Paramedicine

Marc Colbeck, Sonja Maria, Georgette Eaton, C. Campbell, A. Batt, Matthew R Caffey
{"title":"International Examination and Synthesis of the Primary and Secondary Surveys in Paramedicine","authors":"Marc Colbeck, Sonja Maria, Georgette Eaton, C. Campbell, A. Batt, Matthew R Caffey","doi":"10.32378/IJP.V3I2.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p class=\"Pa2\"><strong>Background</strong></p><p class=\"Pa2\">To guide their care paramedics routinely rely upon two assessment and treatment algorithms, known as the primary survey and the secondary survey.  No clear consensus of the concepts (assessments and interventions) that are, or should be, included in these algorithms exist internationally. </p><p class=\"Pa2\"><strong>Methods </strong></p><p class=\"Pa2\">This paper evaluated Australasian paramedic clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), as well as six other international paramedic CPGs (USA, Ireland, UK, South Africa, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates) in order to identify which concepts are currently described in best-practice recommendations for paramedics.  The authors also contributed concepts that they felt were important additions based on their experience as veteran paramedics and paramedic educators.</p><p class=\"Pa2\"><strong>Results </strong></p><p class=\"Pa2\">The resulting amalgamation of concepts identified in each term was then formed into two mnemonics which, together sequentially list approximately 100 specific clinical concepts that paramedics routinely consider in their care of patients. We describe these as the “International Paramedic Primary and Secondary Surveys”.</p><p class=\"Pa2\"><strong>Conclusion </strong></p><p class=\"Pa2\">The primary and secondary surveys presented in this paper represent an evidence-based guide to the best practice in conducting a primary and secondary survey in the paramedic context.  Findings will be of use to paramedics, paramedic students, and other clinicians working in remote or isolated practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":367364,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32378/IJP.V3I2.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

To guide their care paramedics routinely rely upon two assessment and treatment algorithms, known as the primary survey and the secondary survey.  No clear consensus of the concepts (assessments and interventions) that are, or should be, included in these algorithms exist internationally. 

Methods

This paper evaluated Australasian paramedic clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), as well as six other international paramedic CPGs (USA, Ireland, UK, South Africa, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates) in order to identify which concepts are currently described in best-practice recommendations for paramedics.  The authors also contributed concepts that they felt were important additions based on their experience as veteran paramedics and paramedic educators.

Results

The resulting amalgamation of concepts identified in each term was then formed into two mnemonics which, together sequentially list approximately 100 specific clinical concepts that paramedics routinely consider in their care of patients. We describe these as the “International Paramedic Primary and Secondary Surveys”.

Conclusion

The primary and secondary surveys presented in this paper represent an evidence-based guide to the best practice in conducting a primary and secondary survey in the paramedic context.  Findings will be of use to paramedics, paramedic students, and other clinicians working in remote or isolated practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助医学初级和二级调查的国际审查与综合
背景:为了指导他们的护理,护理人员通常依靠两种评估和治疗算法,即主要调查和次要调查。国际上对这些算法应包括或应包括的概念(评估和干预)没有明确的共识。方法本文评估了澳大利亚护理人员临床实践指南(cpg),以及其他六个国际护理人员cpg(美国、爱尔兰、英国、南非、卡塔尔和阿拉伯联合酋长国),以确定哪些概念目前在护理人员最佳实践建议中被描述。作者还根据他们作为资深护理人员和护理教育者的经验,提供了他们认为重要的补充概念。结果在每个术语中确定的概念合并后形成了两个助记符,它们依次列出了护理人员在护理患者时通常考虑的大约100个特定临床概念。我们将这些称为“国际护理人员初级和二级调查”。结论本文提出的初级和二级调查为护理人员开展初级和二级调查的最佳实践提供了循证指南。研究结果将用于护理人员,护理学生,和其他临床医生在远程或孤立的做法工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical presentations and practitioner levels appropriate for the introduction of ‘Treat and Referral’ into the Irish Emergency Medical Service: A survey of Consultants in emergency medicine. Wellbeing series: Meditation for paramedics Wellbeing series: Empathy and paramedic wellbeing Wellbeing Series: Shifting the Focus to Nutrition Wellbeing Series: Building Mental Health Resilience for Emergency Personnel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1