European America: The Effect of Underreported Transfer Benefits and Cost-of-Living on Cross-National Poverty Analysis

M. George
{"title":"European America: The Effect of Underreported Transfer Benefits and Cost-of-Living on Cross-National Poverty Analysis","authors":"M. George","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2932938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the extent to which correcting for the underreporting of transfer benefits in the American Current Population Survey (CPS) complicates typical analyses comparing the effect of anti-poverty policy in the United States and Europe. Previous research suggests that up to one-half of social program spending by the American Federal government is not accounted for in CPS data harmonized for cross-national analysis by the Luxembourg Income Study and Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation. Using a microsimulation model to align survey responses with administrative data at the federal and state level decreases the overall and child relative poverty rates by 16% and 21% respectively. This doubles the number of Americans living in states with ‘European’ poverty rates to 25%, from 42 to 79 million, and demonstrates that more Americans live in states with ‘social democratic’ levels of poverty than the populations of Denmark, Finland, Norway, the Netherlands, and Sweden combined. Adjusting the national American poverty line for cost-of-living further suggests that 38% of Americans live in states with poverty rates typical of European countries. If a relative poverty line calculated across the European Union is used instead to reflect variation in standard of living across the EU, correcting for underreporting increases the share of Americans living in states with poverty rates below the EU member state average from 66% of the population to 94%.. Ultimately, given the varying adoption of administrative income data across countries, growing rates of underreporting in the CPS with variation across American states, and the increasing devolution of American social policy, comparative analyses of poverty and policy that do not consider underreporting or subnational variation risk biased conclusions.","PeriodicalId":125977,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Employment","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Employment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2932938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the extent to which correcting for the underreporting of transfer benefits in the American Current Population Survey (CPS) complicates typical analyses comparing the effect of anti-poverty policy in the United States and Europe. Previous research suggests that up to one-half of social program spending by the American Federal government is not accounted for in CPS data harmonized for cross-national analysis by the Luxembourg Income Study and Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation. Using a microsimulation model to align survey responses with administrative data at the federal and state level decreases the overall and child relative poverty rates by 16% and 21% respectively. This doubles the number of Americans living in states with ‘European’ poverty rates to 25%, from 42 to 79 million, and demonstrates that more Americans live in states with ‘social democratic’ levels of poverty than the populations of Denmark, Finland, Norway, the Netherlands, and Sweden combined. Adjusting the national American poverty line for cost-of-living further suggests that 38% of Americans live in states with poverty rates typical of European countries. If a relative poverty line calculated across the European Union is used instead to reflect variation in standard of living across the EU, correcting for underreporting increases the share of Americans living in states with poverty rates below the EU member state average from 66% of the population to 94%.. Ultimately, given the varying adoption of administrative income data across countries, growing rates of underreporting in the CPS with variation across American states, and the increasing devolution of American social policy, comparative analyses of poverty and policy that do not consider underreporting or subnational variation risk biased conclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲美洲:少报的转移收益和生活成本对跨国贫困分析的影响
本研究调查了在美国当前人口调查(CPS)中对转移收益漏报的纠正在多大程度上使比较美国和欧洲反贫困政策效果的典型分析复杂化。此前的研究表明,美国联邦政府多达一半的社会项目支出没有计入由卢森堡收入研究组织和经济发展与合作组织进行的跨国分析的CPS数据。使用微观模拟模型将调查结果与联邦和州一级的行政数据结合起来,总体贫困率和儿童相对贫困率分别降低了16%和21%。这使生活在“欧洲”贫困率州的美国人数量翻了一番,从4200万增加到7900万,达到25%,并表明生活在“社会民主”贫困率州的美国人比丹麦、芬兰、挪威、荷兰和瑞典的人口加起来还要多。根据生活成本进一步调整美国全国贫困线表明,38%的美国人生活在贫困率与典型的欧洲国家相当的州。如果在整个欧盟范围内计算的相对贫困线被用来反映整个欧盟生活水平的差异,那么对低报的修正将使生活在贫困率低于欧盟成员国平均水平的国家的美国人的比例从66%增加到94%。最后,考虑到各国对行政收入数据采用的不同、美国各州CPS低报率的增长以及美国社会政策权力下放的增加,不考虑低报或次国家差异的贫困和政策比较分析可能会导致结论存在偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Relative Disadvantages in College Hinder Female Leadership? Policy Forum: Tax, Social Security, and Employment Status - Removing the Distortions in the United Kingdom Noncompete Clauses, Job Mobility, and Job Quality: Evidence from a Low-Earning Noncompete Ban in Austria Propagation and Amplification of Local Productivity Spillovers A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates under Limited Household Risk Sharing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1