Leakage and Cavity Pressures in an Interlocking Labyrinth Gas Seal: Measurements vs. Predictions

L. San Andrés, Tingcheng Wu, Jose Barajas-Rivera, Jiaxin Zhang, R. Kawashita
{"title":"Leakage and Cavity Pressures in an Interlocking Labyrinth Gas Seal: Measurements vs. Predictions","authors":"L. San Andrés, Tingcheng Wu, Jose Barajas-Rivera, Jiaxin Zhang, R. Kawashita","doi":"10.1115/gt2019-91507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Gas labyrinth seals (LS) restrict secondary flows (leakage) in turbomachinery and their impact on the efficiency and rotordynamic stability of high-pressure compressors and steam turbines can hardly be overstated. Amongst seal types, the interlocking labyrinth seal (ILS), having teeth on both the rotor and on the stator, is able to reduce leakage up to 30% compared to other LSs with either all teeth on the rotor or all teeth on the stator. This paper introduces a revamped facility to test gas seals for their rotordynamic performance and presents measurements of the leakage and cavity pressures in a five teeth ILS. The seal with overall length/diameter L/D = 0.3 and small tip clearance Cr/D = 0.00133 is supplied with air at T = 298 K and increasing inlet pressure Pin = 0.3 MPa ∼ 1.3 MPa, while the exit pressure/inlet pressure ratio PR = Pout/Pin is set to range from 0.3 to 0.8. The rotor speed varies from null to 10 krpm (79 m/s max. surface speed). During the tests, instrumentation records the seal mass flow (ṁ) and static pressure in each cavity. In parallel, a bulk-flow model (BFM) and a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis predict the flow field and deliver the same performance characteristics, namely leakage and cavity pressures. Both measurements and predictions agree closely (within 5%) and demonstrate the seal mass flow rate is independent of rotor speed. A modified flow factor Φ¯=m.T/PinD1-PR2 characterizes best the seal mass flow with a unique magnitude for all pressure conditions, Pin and PR.","PeriodicalId":131756,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2019-91507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Gas labyrinth seals (LS) restrict secondary flows (leakage) in turbomachinery and their impact on the efficiency and rotordynamic stability of high-pressure compressors and steam turbines can hardly be overstated. Amongst seal types, the interlocking labyrinth seal (ILS), having teeth on both the rotor and on the stator, is able to reduce leakage up to 30% compared to other LSs with either all teeth on the rotor or all teeth on the stator. This paper introduces a revamped facility to test gas seals for their rotordynamic performance and presents measurements of the leakage and cavity pressures in a five teeth ILS. The seal with overall length/diameter L/D = 0.3 and small tip clearance Cr/D = 0.00133 is supplied with air at T = 298 K and increasing inlet pressure Pin = 0.3 MPa ∼ 1.3 MPa, while the exit pressure/inlet pressure ratio PR = Pout/Pin is set to range from 0.3 to 0.8. The rotor speed varies from null to 10 krpm (79 m/s max. surface speed). During the tests, instrumentation records the seal mass flow (ṁ) and static pressure in each cavity. In parallel, a bulk-flow model (BFM) and a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis predict the flow field and deliver the same performance characteristics, namely leakage and cavity pressures. Both measurements and predictions agree closely (within 5%) and demonstrate the seal mass flow rate is independent of rotor speed. A modified flow factor Φ¯=m.T/PinD1-PR2 characterizes best the seal mass flow with a unique magnitude for all pressure conditions, Pin and PR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联锁迷宫式气体密封中的泄漏和空腔压力:测量与预测
气体迷宫式密封(LS)限制了涡轮机械中的二次流(泄漏),对高压压气机和汽轮机的效率和转子动态稳定性的影响不容忽视。在密封类型中,联锁迷宫密封(ILS)在转子和定子上都有齿,与其他全齿在转子上或全齿在定子上的锁齿密封相比,能够减少高达30%的泄漏。本文介绍了一种改进的气体密封转子动力性能测试装置,并介绍了五齿气体密封泄漏和空腔压力的测量。总长度/直径L/D = 0.3,小叶尖间隙Cr/D = 0.00133的密封在T = 298 K时供气,增加进口压力Pin = 0.3 MPa ~ 1.3 MPa,而出口压力/进口压力比PR = Pout/Pin设置为0.3 ~ 0.8。转子速度变化从零到10公里每分钟(79米/秒最大。表面速度)。在测试过程中,仪器记录每个腔内的密封质量、流量和静压。同时,体积流模型(BFM)和计算流体动力学(CFD)分析可以预测流场,并提供相同的性能特征,即泄漏和空腔压力。测量和预测都非常接近(在5%以内),并证明密封质量流量与转子转速无关。修正流量系数Φ¯=m。T/PinD1-PR2在所有压力条件下(Pin和PR)都具有独特的密封质量流量大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simulation, Test and Mitigation of 1/2X Forward Whirl Following Rotor Drop Onto Auxiliary Bearings Study on Vibration Response Characteristics of Mistuned Bladed Disk Expressed by Vibratory Stress Pump Grooved Seals: A CFD Approach to Improve Bulk-Flow Model Predictions Comparison of a Liquid Annular Seal for Pump Applications With and Without a Swirl Brake Prediction of Geometrically Induced Localization Effects Using a Subset of Nominal System Modes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1