Usability of laboratory information system in Tabriz educational hospitals from user’s perspective

Shahla Damanabi, Elham Monaghesh, R. Faraji
{"title":"Usability of laboratory information system in Tabriz educational hospitals from user’s perspective","authors":"Shahla Damanabi, Elham Monaghesh, R. Faraji","doi":"10.29252/JMIS.5.1.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Applicability is the extent to which a particular product can be used by specific users to achieve specific goals in a specific field with effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. Due to the fact that the lab information system plays an important role in improving laboratory processes and some vital information of the patient is recorded in this system, the existence of an error in this system endangers the patient. The purpose of this study was to measure the applicability of the laboratory information system in hospitals affiliated to Tabriz University of Medical Sciences using two methods of System Usability Scale and Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in 1396. A QUIS and SUS standard questionnaire was used to collect information. After translation, its validity was confirmed by a number of professors. The research population consisted of users working in six educational centers of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences who had experience working with the laboratory information system. Because of the limited number of users, the census method has been used and the sample size is 69. The data obtained in the SPSS is imported and presented in the form of tables and charts. Results: In total, 40.07% of the users were satisfied with the system, with the highest degree of satisfaction with the system's convenient learning with 54%, followed by the system's usefulness with 50.07% satisfaction. Conclusion: According to the findings of the present study, it became clear that the information system of the laboratory was simple to use from the viewpoint of users, and the operation of these systems was not complicated and easy to learn, but the system lacked the flexibility that should be taken into consideration when designing this system. Sci. 2019;","PeriodicalId":231482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/JMIS.5.1.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: Applicability is the extent to which a particular product can be used by specific users to achieve specific goals in a specific field with effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. Due to the fact that the lab information system plays an important role in improving laboratory processes and some vital information of the patient is recorded in this system, the existence of an error in this system endangers the patient. The purpose of this study was to measure the applicability of the laboratory information system in hospitals affiliated to Tabriz University of Medical Sciences using two methods of System Usability Scale and Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in 1396. A QUIS and SUS standard questionnaire was used to collect information. After translation, its validity was confirmed by a number of professors. The research population consisted of users working in six educational centers of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences who had experience working with the laboratory information system. Because of the limited number of users, the census method has been used and the sample size is 69. The data obtained in the SPSS is imported and presented in the form of tables and charts. Results: In total, 40.07% of the users were satisfied with the system, with the highest degree of satisfaction with the system's convenient learning with 54%, followed by the system's usefulness with 50.07% satisfaction. Conclusion: According to the findings of the present study, it became clear that the information system of the laboratory was simple to use from the viewpoint of users, and the operation of these systems was not complicated and easy to learn, but the system lacked the flexibility that should be taken into consideration when designing this system. Sci. 2019;
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从用户角度看大不里士教育医院实验室信息系统的可用性
目的:适用性是指特定的产品可以被特定的用户有效、高效和满意地使用,以达到特定领域的特定目标的程度。由于实验室信息系统在改进实验室流程中起着重要的作用,并且患者的一些重要信息记录在该系统中,因此该系统中的错误存在将危及患者。本研究采用系统可用性量表和用户界面满意度问卷两种方法,对大不里士医科大学附属医院实验室信息系统的适用性进行测评。方法:本描述性横断面研究于1996年在大不里士医科大学进行。采用QUIS和SUS标准问卷收集信息。经翻译,其有效性得到了多位教授的肯定。研究人群包括在大不里士医科大学六个教育中心工作的用户,他们有使用实验室信息系统的经验。由于调查对象数量有限,采用人口普查方法,样本量为69人。在SPSS中获得的数据被导入并以表格和图表的形式呈现。结果:总体而言,40.07%的用户对系统感到满意,其中对系统的方便性满意度最高,为54%,其次是系统的有用性,满意度为50.07%。结论:根据本研究的发现,从用户的角度来看,实验室的信息系统使用简单,这些系统的操作并不复杂,易于学习,但系统缺乏设计时应考虑的灵活性。Sci。2019;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognizing the factors affecting the satisfaction of students of Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences: A qualitative study Advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation updates 2020: a narrative review Design and implementation of tools for rapid assessment of the status of documentation of emergency department' physicians The acceptance model of e-learning during the coronavirus pandemic Investigating Barriers and Providing an Appropriate Model for Establishing Total Quality Management: A Case Study in Hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1