Online Critical Debate Model: Designing and Analyzing Deliberation for the Digital Age

Claudio Fuentes Bravo, Julián Goñi Jerez
{"title":"Online Critical Debate Model: Designing and Analyzing Deliberation for the Digital Age","authors":"Claudio Fuentes Bravo, Julián Goñi Jerez","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through our experience during a large-scale public engagement exercise in Chile we draw conclusions to adapt and improve the Critical Debate Model to an online format. We highlight the importance of epistemic opposition and structured annotation for the execution of debates, while also exploring the possibilities of automated analysis using Natural Language Processing. We conclude by describing how an online version of the Critical Debate Model could be implemented.","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Through our experience during a large-scale public engagement exercise in Chile we draw conclusions to adapt and improve the Critical Debate Model to an online format. We highlight the importance of epistemic opposition and structured annotation for the execution of debates, while also exploring the possibilities of automated analysis using Natural Language Processing. We conclude by describing how an online version of the Critical Debate Model could be implemented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线批判性辩论模式:设计与分析数字时代的思考
根据我们在智利大规模公众参与活动中的经验,我们得出结论,以适应和改进在线形式的批判性辩论模式。我们强调了认知对立和结构化注释对辩论执行的重要性,同时也探索了使用自然语言处理进行自动分析的可能性。最后,我们描述了如何实施在线版本的批判性辩论模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Puer bonus communicandi peritus. Esercizi e strumenti per dibattere tra pari Il dibattito come rischio educativo A Rhetorical Model of Debating Improving Argumentative Skills in Education: Three Online Discussion Tools Odyssey' Scientific Debate: Rhetoric STEM Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1