Гальваногрязелечение в реабилитации пациентов с болями в нижней части спины

Елена Владимировна Филатова, Х. М. Малаев
{"title":"Гальваногрязелечение в реабилитации пациентов с болями в нижней части спины","authors":"Елена Владимировна Филатова, Х. М. Малаев","doi":"10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-1-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. Evaluati on of the effectiveness of complex restorati ve treatment with the inclusion of galvanic mud procedures in patients with pain in the lower back. Patients and methods. There were 30 patients (18 men and 12 women) with a diagnosis: lumbulgia or lumboeishalgia under observation. Patients underwent a course of rehabilitation on the basis of the Republican Hospital of Rehabilitation, Makhachkala. Against the background of standard therapy, galvanic mud procedures were included in the therapy.  The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by the control of pain assessment according to the VAS scale, the body mass index, the psychoemoti onal state of the HAM test, the tests of Schober and Thomayer were carried out. Results. After the complex treatment in patients, clinical and functional indices of the state of the neuromuscular apparatus Were noted, varying depending on gender. The results of the study showed that the intensity of the pain syndrome according to the VAS score in the compared groups before the rehabilitation differed significantly (5.4 ± 0.1 points in men and 6.16 ± 0.3 in women, (p <0.05), after completion of the course of treatment, the VAS score decreased statistically in both groups: in men 2.0 ± 0.4 points and in women 1.8 ± 0.1 points (p <0.05), but between groups of significant differences in the quantitative assessment of pain the syndrome was not revealed. In determining the mobility of the lumbar spine, the results of the Schober test with lumbargia as in men, and women were unreliably reduced, after treatment restored within the norm: in men before treatment, 3.46 ± 1.47 cm, after 5.3 ± 0.73 cm (p < 0.05), in women before treatment 3.95 ± 0.5 cm, after 5.35 ± 0.55 cm (p < 0.05).The analysis of the dynamics of the test results of Tomayer revealed unreliably significant differences before treatment in men = 24.8 ± 2.4 cm, in women = 21,6 ± 6,2 cm. After the course of treatment in both groups there was a significant improvement in the indices: in men = 5.23 ± 1.44 cm (p <0.05), in women 1.45 ± 0.87 cm (p < 0,05), but at the same time a reliable difference in the indices (p < 0.01). Conclusion. The conducted research has shown that carrying out galvanic mud procedures in a complex of treatment in patients with lower back pain positively influences the restoration of lumbar vertebral segment motor activity, as well as the psychoemotional state of the patient. In this case, women are more actively reduced pain and increased motor activity, but less significant indicators of the change in the psychological test.","PeriodicalId":119961,"journal":{"name":"Research'n Practical Medicine Journal","volume":"494 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research'n Practical Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-1-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. Evaluati on of the effectiveness of complex restorati ve treatment with the inclusion of galvanic mud procedures in patients with pain in the lower back. Patients and methods. There were 30 patients (18 men and 12 women) with a diagnosis: lumbulgia or lumboeishalgia under observation. Patients underwent a course of rehabilitation on the basis of the Republican Hospital of Rehabilitation, Makhachkala. Against the background of standard therapy, galvanic mud procedures were included in the therapy.  The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by the control of pain assessment according to the VAS scale, the body mass index, the psychoemoti onal state of the HAM test, the tests of Schober and Thomayer were carried out. Results. After the complex treatment in patients, clinical and functional indices of the state of the neuromuscular apparatus Were noted, varying depending on gender. The results of the study showed that the intensity of the pain syndrome according to the VAS score in the compared groups before the rehabilitation differed significantly (5.4 ± 0.1 points in men and 6.16 ± 0.3 in women, (p <0.05), after completion of the course of treatment, the VAS score decreased statistically in both groups: in men 2.0 ± 0.4 points and in women 1.8 ± 0.1 points (p <0.05), but between groups of significant differences in the quantitative assessment of pain the syndrome was not revealed. In determining the mobility of the lumbar spine, the results of the Schober test with lumbargia as in men, and women were unreliably reduced, after treatment restored within the norm: in men before treatment, 3.46 ± 1.47 cm, after 5.3 ± 0.73 cm (p < 0.05), in women before treatment 3.95 ± 0.5 cm, after 5.35 ± 0.55 cm (p < 0.05).The analysis of the dynamics of the test results of Tomayer revealed unreliably significant differences before treatment in men = 24.8 ± 2.4 cm, in women = 21,6 ± 6,2 cm. After the course of treatment in both groups there was a significant improvement in the indices: in men = 5.23 ± 1.44 cm (p <0.05), in women 1.45 ± 0.87 cm (p < 0,05), but at the same time a reliable difference in the indices (p < 0.01). Conclusion. The conducted research has shown that carrying out galvanic mud procedures in a complex of treatment in patients with lower back pain positively influences the restoration of lumbar vertebral segment motor activity, as well as the psychoemotional state of the patient. In this case, women are more actively reduced pain and increased motor activity, but less significant indicators of the change in the psychological test.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗下背部疼痛的病人。
目的。下背部疼痛患者复合修复治疗包括电泥治疗的疗效评价。患者和方法。有30例患者(18男12女)诊断为腰痛或腰痛观察。病人在马哈奇卡拉共和国康复医院接受了一个康复疗程。在标准治疗的背景下,电泥浆程序被纳入治疗。根据VAS评分、体重指数、HAM心理情绪状态测试、Schober和Thomayer测试进行疼痛控制评估治疗效果。结果。在患者的复杂治疗后,注意到神经肌肉装置状态的临床和功能指标,因性别而异。研究结果显示,两组患者康复前疼痛综合征VAS评分强度差异有统计学意义(男性为5.4±0.1分,女性为6.16±0.3分,p <0.05),疗程结束后,两组患者VAS评分均有统计学意义下降;男性2.0±0.4分,女性1.8±0.1分,差异有统计学意义(p <0.05),但两组间疼痛综合征定量评价差异无统计学意义。在测定腰椎活动度时,腰痛患者的Schober试验结果与男性和女性相比,在治疗后均不可靠地降低,恢复到正常范围内:男性治疗前为3.46±1.47 cm,治疗后为5.3±0.73 cm (p < 0.05),女性治疗前为3.95±0.5 cm,治疗后为5.35±0.55 cm (p < 0.05)。对Tomayer测试结果的动态分析显示,治疗前男性= 24.8±2.4 cm,女性= 21,6±6.2 cm,差异不可靠。治疗结束后,两组患者的各项指标均有显著改善:男性= 5.23±1.44 cm (p <0.05),女性= 1.45±0.87 cm (p <0.05),但两组患者的各项指标均有可靠差异(p < 0.01)。结论。已开展的研究表明,在下背痛患者的综合治疗中进行电泥浆程序对腰椎节段运动活动的恢复以及患者的心理情绪状态有积极影响。在这种情况下,女性更积极地减少疼痛和增加运动活动,但在心理测试中变化的指标不太显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Роль биомаркеров острого повреждения почек в прогнозировании функциональных результатов хирургического лечения у больных локализованным раком почки ПРОВЕДЕНИЕ СКРИНИНГА РАКА МОЛОЧНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ В УСЛОВИЯХ НЕБЛАГОПРИЯТНОЙ ЭПИДЕМИОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ СИТУАЦИИ COVID-19 Нейропсихологические особенности пациенток репродуктивного возраста с диагнозом рак молочной железы на этапе хирургического лечения с применением ксенон-кислородной терапии Direct effectiveness of adding local hyperthermia to the scheme of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer Remodeling the cancer service in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic at the Federal research center of the 1st level
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1