Semantic-stylistic status of brandonyms

Viktoriia Shymanska, Inna Kolomiiets
{"title":"Semantic-stylistic status of brandonyms","authors":"Viktoriia Shymanska, Inna Kolomiiets","doi":"10.31499/2415-8828.2.2021.246094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the consideration of brandonyms from the standpoint of defining the status of lexical affiliation and their role in the stylistic organization of different texts. The article analyzes the issues aimed at clarifying such terms as «universal», «etrangism», «barbarism», as well as defines «brandonym», «text», determines the ability of brandonyms to acquire the characteristics of stylistics of certain messages, including advertising texts, and those that promote a particular idea implicitly. The onym space of any text is a reflection of the subjective assessment of the word by the author, therefore, the article emphasizes the peculiarities of introducing brandonyms to the texts of the above functional styles of modern Ukrainian standard language, as well as the specifics of mental and linguistic view of the world of an individual – the author of certain messages – as a representative of ethnolinguistic culture, the native of a separate language and philosophy. \nThe relevance of the article is due to the need to trace functioning of proper names, in particular brandonyms, to try to establish their status in different texts. \nThe aim of the article is to define the status of brandonyms from the standpoint of their affiliation to a certain group of vocabulary and stylistic purpose in the texts of literary and journalistic styles. \nResearch methods are due to the peculiarities of the analysis of proprial vocabulary, which involves the use of descriptive method and a comprehensive approach to considering the functioning of specific lexical units in a particular text and their potential to create a certain stylistic intonation and power in achieving the overall goal of discourse formulation. \nIn our opinion, the article is a necessary study in the research of Ukrainian onomastics, in particular the stylistic functions of proprietary names in various texts. \nConclusions. Brandonyms cannot be assigned to one specific group: «barbarism», «entragism», or have only an understanding of it as a linguistic universal as all other propriatives both purely for theoretical reasons and in terms of functioning in a separate text, the studied language units may vary in the aspect of a clear assignment to one named group of vocabulary. From a stylistic point of view, brandonyms are not endowed with superpowerful properties of creating some sublime or lyrical intonation of the text, but have considerable potential to help achieve the goal of literary style – to reproduce the socio-temporal color of the described events and phenomena – and journalistic – providing voluntative function, and to act as a dominant of linguistic ambivalence.","PeriodicalId":180896,"journal":{"name":"Philological Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31499/2415-8828.2.2021.246094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the consideration of brandonyms from the standpoint of defining the status of lexical affiliation and their role in the stylistic organization of different texts. The article analyzes the issues aimed at clarifying such terms as «universal», «etrangism», «barbarism», as well as defines «brandonym», «text», determines the ability of brandonyms to acquire the characteristics of stylistics of certain messages, including advertising texts, and those that promote a particular idea implicitly. The onym space of any text is a reflection of the subjective assessment of the word by the author, therefore, the article emphasizes the peculiarities of introducing brandonyms to the texts of the above functional styles of modern Ukrainian standard language, as well as the specifics of mental and linguistic view of the world of an individual – the author of certain messages – as a representative of ethnolinguistic culture, the native of a separate language and philosophy. The relevance of the article is due to the need to trace functioning of proper names, in particular brandonyms, to try to establish their status in different texts. The aim of the article is to define the status of brandonyms from the standpoint of their affiliation to a certain group of vocabulary and stylistic purpose in the texts of literary and journalistic styles. Research methods are due to the peculiarities of the analysis of proprial vocabulary, which involves the use of descriptive method and a comprehensive approach to considering the functioning of specific lexical units in a particular text and their potential to create a certain stylistic intonation and power in achieving the overall goal of discourse formulation. In our opinion, the article is a necessary study in the research of Ukrainian onomastics, in particular the stylistic functions of proprietary names in various texts. Conclusions. Brandonyms cannot be assigned to one specific group: «barbarism», «entragism», or have only an understanding of it as a linguistic universal as all other propriatives both purely for theoretical reasons and in terms of functioning in a separate text, the studied language units may vary in the aspect of a clear assignment to one named group of vocabulary. From a stylistic point of view, brandonyms are not endowed with superpowerful properties of creating some sublime or lyrical intonation of the text, but have considerable potential to help achieve the goal of literary style – to reproduce the socio-temporal color of the described events and phenomena – and journalistic – providing voluntative function, and to act as a dominant of linguistic ambivalence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
别名的语义文体地位
本文从确定词汇隶属关系的地位及其在不同语篇的风格组织中的作用的角度来探讨对别名的思考。本文分析了“普遍性”、“异族主义”、“野蛮主义”等术语的澄清问题,并对“brandonym”、“text”进行了界定,确定了brandonym获得某些信息(包括广告文本)的文体学特征的能力,以及那些隐含地促进特定思想的信息。任何文本反映的术语空间这个词由作者的主观评价,因此,本文强调的特点引入brandonyms上述功能的文本风格的现代乌克兰标准语言,以及精神和语言的具体个人的世界观——某些消息的作者——作为一个有着文化的代表,单独的本地语言和哲学。文章的相关性是由于需要追踪专有名称,特别是假名的功能,以试图确立其在不同文本中的地位。本文的目的是从文学和新闻文体文本中人名与特定词汇群的关系和文体目的的角度来界定人名的地位。研究方法是由于专有词汇分析的特殊性,它涉及到使用描述性方法和综合的方法来考虑特定词汇单位在特定文本中的功能及其在实现话语形成的总体目标中创造某种风格语调和力量的潜力。我们认为,本文是研究乌克兰语专有名词,特别是各种文本中专有名词的文体功能的必要研究。结论。别名不能被分配到一个特定的群体:“野蛮主义”,“entragism”,或者仅仅将其理解为语言的普遍性,就像所有其他专有词一样,纯粹出于理论原因和在单独文本中的功能,所研究的语言单位可能在明确分配给一个命名的词汇组方面有所不同。从文体学的角度来看,化名并不具有创造文本崇高或抒情语调的超强特性,而是具有相当大的潜力,有助于实现文学风格的目标-再现所描述的事件和现象的社会时间色彩-以及新闻-提供自愿功能,并作为语言矛盾心理的主导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urgent problems and perspectives of the national Ukrainian language functioning Experiences of strangeness in the prose of Éva Berniczky Dialogue of the forever living (diary entries of Oleksandr Dovzhenko and Yevhen Sverstiuk in the context of the 20th – 21st centuries) Сreative potential of metaphor in the cycle of stories by Hryhor Tiutiunnyk «Steppe Tale» Peculiarities of semantics and grammatical organization of phraseological units with the "zemlia" component
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1