Rags to Riches Revisited: The Effect of City Size and Related Factors on the Recruitment of Business Leaders

John N. Ingham
{"title":"Rags to Riches Revisited: The Effect of City Size and Related Factors on the Recruitment of Business Leaders","authors":"John N. Ingham","doi":"10.2307/1887348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE question of control of the nation's industrial system has troubled social scientists for several decades. While well-publicized debates continue about who controls the present economic structure, a quieter, yet fundamentally important, controversy has occurred about which groups held power in the early years of industrialization. Two broad theories have developed about the late-nineteenth century. On one side are those who argue that a new, radically different social and economic group moved into control with the onset of industrialism. On the other side are those who posit that the industrializing process remained under the control of the same groups that had dominated the economy and society of the preindustrial era. Of those who have argued for the emergence of a new elite under industrialization, the most popular has been Matthew Josephson.' He viewed the new industrialists as men from lower social origins, who, by ability, chance, and hard work, had dramatically risen to the top of the economic pyramid. They, therefore, represented a profound social transformation in the control of the American economy, creating, in effect, a new \"power elite.\" These ideas have been further systematized by Herbert G. Gutman. He has portrayed the industrialists of the late-nineteenth century essentially as \"new men,\" alien beings from outside the local status structures.2 Gutman's conclusion is based on two important social facts concerning the","PeriodicalId":265400,"journal":{"name":"Social Structure and Social Mobility","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Structure and Social Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1887348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

THE question of control of the nation's industrial system has troubled social scientists for several decades. While well-publicized debates continue about who controls the present economic structure, a quieter, yet fundamentally important, controversy has occurred about which groups held power in the early years of industrialization. Two broad theories have developed about the late-nineteenth century. On one side are those who argue that a new, radically different social and economic group moved into control with the onset of industrialism. On the other side are those who posit that the industrializing process remained under the control of the same groups that had dominated the economy and society of the preindustrial era. Of those who have argued for the emergence of a new elite under industrialization, the most popular has been Matthew Josephson.' He viewed the new industrialists as men from lower social origins, who, by ability, chance, and hard work, had dramatically risen to the top of the economic pyramid. They, therefore, represented a profound social transformation in the control of the American economy, creating, in effect, a new "power elite." These ideas have been further systematized by Herbert G. Gutman. He has portrayed the industrialists of the late-nineteenth century essentially as "new men," alien beings from outside the local status structures.2 Gutman's conclusion is based on two important social facts concerning the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白手起家:城市规模及相关因素对商业领袖招聘的影响
控制国家工业体系的问题已经困扰社会科学家几十年了。当关于谁控制着当前经济结构的广泛辩论继续进行时,一个更安静、但具有根本重要性的争论已经发生了,即在工业化的早期,哪些集团掌握着权力。19世纪晚期出现了两种广泛的理论。一派人认为,随着工业主义的兴起,一个全新的、完全不同的社会和经济群体掌握了控制权。另一方面,有人认为工业化进程仍然处于前工业化时代统治经济和社会的同一集团的控制之下。在那些主张在工业化进程中出现新精英的人当中,最受欢迎的是马修•约瑟夫森(Matthew Josephson)。在他看来,新兴的实业家都是社会底层的人,他们凭借能力、机遇和努力工作,戏剧性地爬到了经济金字塔的顶端。因此,他们代表了对美国经济控制的深刻社会变革,实际上创造了一个新的“权力精英”。这些观点被赫伯特·g·古特曼进一步系统化。他把十九世纪晚期的实业家描绘成“新人”,是来自当地地位结构之外的异类古特曼的结论是基于两个重要的社会事实
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work and Restlessness: Occupational and Spatial Mobility among Mexicanos in Los Angeles, 1918—1928 Migration and Jobs Trends in the Determinants Underlying the Process of Social Stratification: Boston 1880–1920 Occupational Mobility and Nativity–Ethnicity in Indianapolis, 1850–60* Changes in Workplace and Residential Locations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1