The Anthropocentric Vision: Aesthetics of Effect and Terror in Poe’s “Hop-Frog”

Satwik Dasgupta
{"title":"The Anthropocentric Vision: Aesthetics of Effect and Terror in Poe’s “Hop-Frog”","authors":"Satwik Dasgupta","doi":"10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201161527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1996, Gabriele Rippl wrote a seminal essay on the connection between Edgar Allan Poe and anthropology, formulating an unusual approach to Poe's fiction. Re-examining Poe's aesthetics, specifically through tales dealing with the body or the essential physicality of the characters, Rippl argues, would demonstrate that it is the readers who are indirectly the author of these tales. In other words, one can generate meaning from these texts provided one is able to discern Poe's vision as directed towards a reader-centric anthropology, whereby the author's aesthetics of terror are but a measure of his readers' responsiveness. As Rippl puts it, \"[a] discussion of the anthropological impact of Poe's literary texts shows that his real interest is not so much in representing current conceptions of man, but rather the anthropology of the reader,\" and \"it is not the examination of the body as such that interests Poe but the aesthetic effects to be achieved by this detailed presentation.\" (1) In addition, Rippl observes that just as Poe's protagonists become victims of their self-generated terrors, the readers are \"victims\" of Poe's aesthetics of the unity of effect, something that has been termed \"aesthetics\" of terror. Herbert Grabes points out that \"[t]he growing interest in culture, or rather cultures, speaks for ... cultural anthropology,\" and \"in this case, literature will be considered mainly as a cultural product providing evidence of the particular features of the culture within which it is produced.\" (2) What Grabes observes about \"cultural anthropology\" is traceable in Poe's fiction because it generally projects narrators into extreme conditions/states of being in the context of their immediate socio-cultural surroundings. Poe engaged in probing the essentials of mind-body dichotomy pointing to larger concerns affecting the human psyche. Whether satires, hoaxes, \"arabesques,\" or \"grotesques,\" Poe envisioned and revealed the minds of men possessing various degrees of sanity, intelligence, physical characteristics, and the like to highlight Man's existential crisis. As readers, we can understand and appreciate Poe's anthropocentrism by re-evaluating his fiction with respect to his essential ideas of the human being, both as a social animal and a cultural trope. Gabriele Rippl uses four tales from Poe's oeuvre--\"Ligeia\" (1838), \"The Fall of the House of Usher\" (1839), \"The Pit and the Pendulum\" (1842), and \"The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar\" (1845)--to demonstrate how Poe exploited his readers' anthropology to generate meaning and achieve his aesthetic of unity and terror. Graves' concept of the reader-centric anthropology is particularly suitable for Poe's fiction. \"The anthropology of the reader\" in Poe's fiction would mean that the readers' reactions and attitudes towards specific tropes of horror or cruelty are directly proportional to and built upon their inherent tolerance or repugnance towards such visions of atrocity. This concept is similar to the reader-response theory of criticism, but with more emphasis on the readers' emotional constitution; their preconceived and deep-seated reactions to terror and violence impute significance to the goings-on in a particular tale and accordingly render it terrifying/grotesque. In these tales, Rippl sees various dichotomies (ideal-real, mind-body, natural-supernatural) that work their way through the respective narratives to reveal, at every turn, disturbing images of potential violence, terror, and grotesquerie aimed to shock and surprise the readers. This essay demonstrates how Poe's \"Hop-Frog\" (1849) not only fruitfully yields an anthropological examination of the aforesaid aspects of the author's fiction, but also fittingly generates a heightened texture of horror, violence, and aesthetics of terror by literally visualizing the psycho-social evolution of a semi-anthropoid figure, which encapsulates in itself the extremities of physical deformity and mental acuity, a combination that was both popular and feared in nineteenth-century America. …","PeriodicalId":288505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201161527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1996, Gabriele Rippl wrote a seminal essay on the connection between Edgar Allan Poe and anthropology, formulating an unusual approach to Poe's fiction. Re-examining Poe's aesthetics, specifically through tales dealing with the body or the essential physicality of the characters, Rippl argues, would demonstrate that it is the readers who are indirectly the author of these tales. In other words, one can generate meaning from these texts provided one is able to discern Poe's vision as directed towards a reader-centric anthropology, whereby the author's aesthetics of terror are but a measure of his readers' responsiveness. As Rippl puts it, "[a] discussion of the anthropological impact of Poe's literary texts shows that his real interest is not so much in representing current conceptions of man, but rather the anthropology of the reader," and "it is not the examination of the body as such that interests Poe but the aesthetic effects to be achieved by this detailed presentation." (1) In addition, Rippl observes that just as Poe's protagonists become victims of their self-generated terrors, the readers are "victims" of Poe's aesthetics of the unity of effect, something that has been termed "aesthetics" of terror. Herbert Grabes points out that "[t]he growing interest in culture, or rather cultures, speaks for ... cultural anthropology," and "in this case, literature will be considered mainly as a cultural product providing evidence of the particular features of the culture within which it is produced." (2) What Grabes observes about "cultural anthropology" is traceable in Poe's fiction because it generally projects narrators into extreme conditions/states of being in the context of their immediate socio-cultural surroundings. Poe engaged in probing the essentials of mind-body dichotomy pointing to larger concerns affecting the human psyche. Whether satires, hoaxes, "arabesques," or "grotesques," Poe envisioned and revealed the minds of men possessing various degrees of sanity, intelligence, physical characteristics, and the like to highlight Man's existential crisis. As readers, we can understand and appreciate Poe's anthropocentrism by re-evaluating his fiction with respect to his essential ideas of the human being, both as a social animal and a cultural trope. Gabriele Rippl uses four tales from Poe's oeuvre--"Ligeia" (1838), "The Fall of the House of Usher" (1839), "The Pit and the Pendulum" (1842), and "The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar" (1845)--to demonstrate how Poe exploited his readers' anthropology to generate meaning and achieve his aesthetic of unity and terror. Graves' concept of the reader-centric anthropology is particularly suitable for Poe's fiction. "The anthropology of the reader" in Poe's fiction would mean that the readers' reactions and attitudes towards specific tropes of horror or cruelty are directly proportional to and built upon their inherent tolerance or repugnance towards such visions of atrocity. This concept is similar to the reader-response theory of criticism, but with more emphasis on the readers' emotional constitution; their preconceived and deep-seated reactions to terror and violence impute significance to the goings-on in a particular tale and accordingly render it terrifying/grotesque. In these tales, Rippl sees various dichotomies (ideal-real, mind-body, natural-supernatural) that work their way through the respective narratives to reveal, at every turn, disturbing images of potential violence, terror, and grotesquerie aimed to shock and surprise the readers. This essay demonstrates how Poe's "Hop-Frog" (1849) not only fruitfully yields an anthropological examination of the aforesaid aspects of the author's fiction, but also fittingly generates a heightened texture of horror, violence, and aesthetics of terror by literally visualizing the psycho-social evolution of a semi-anthropoid figure, which encapsulates in itself the extremities of physical deformity and mental acuity, a combination that was both popular and feared in nineteenth-century America. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类中心视野:坡《跳蛙》的效果美学与恐怖美学
1996年,加布里埃尔·里普尔(Gabriele Rippl)写了一篇关于埃德加·爱伦·坡与人类学之间联系的开创性文章,对爱伦·坡的小说提出了一种不同寻常的研究方法。里普尔认为,重新审视坡的美学,特别是通过与身体或人物的基本身体有关的故事,将证明读者是这些故事的间接作者。换句话说,我们可以从这些文本中获得意义,只要我们能够看出坡的视角是指向以读者为中心的人类学,而作者的恐怖美学只是衡量读者反应的一种方式。正如Rippl所说,“对坡的文学文本的人类学影响的讨论表明,他真正的兴趣并不是表现当前的人类观念,而是读者的人类学,”而且“坡感兴趣的不是对身体的检查,而是通过这种详细的呈现所达到的美学效果。”(1)此外,Rippl观察到,正如坡的主人公成为他们自己产生的恐惧的受害者一样,读者也是坡的效果统一美学的“受害者”,这被称为恐怖的“美学”。赫伯特·格雷布斯指出:“人们对文化,或者更确切地说,对文化日益增长的兴趣,说明了……以及“在这种情况下,文学将主要被视为一种文化产品,为其产生的文化的特定特征提供证据。”(2)格雷布斯对“文化人类学”的观察可以追溯到坡的小说中,因为它通常将叙述者置于他们所处的社会文化环境的极端条件/状态中。坡致力于探索身心二分法的本质,指出影响人类心理的更大问题。无论是讽刺、恶作剧、“阿拉伯风格”还是“怪诞”,坡都设想并揭示了具有不同程度的理智、智慧、身体特征等的人的思想,以突出人类的生存危机。作为读者,我们可以通过重新评价坡的小说来理解和欣赏他的人类中心主义,他将人类作为一种社会动物和一种文化比喻。加布里埃尔·里普尔用爱伦·坡作品中的四个故事——《丽吉娅》(1838)、《厄谢尔家的倒塌》(1839)、《坑与钟摆》(1842)和《瓦尔德马先生的真相》(1845)——来展示爱伦·坡如何利用读者的人类学来产生意义,并实现他的统一与恐怖美学。格雷夫斯的以读者为中心的人类学概念特别适用于爱伦坡的小说。坡小说中的“读者的人类学”意味着读者对恐怖或残忍的特定比喻的反应和态度与他们对这种暴行的固有容忍或厌恶成正比并建立在此基础上。这一概念类似于批评的读者反应理论,但更强调读者的情感构成;他们对恐怖和暴力的先入为主和根深蒂固的反应赋予了特定故事中发生的事情以意义,从而使其变得恐怖/怪诞。在这些故事中,Rippl看到了各种各样的二分法(理想-真实,心灵-身体,自然-超自然),这些二分法通过各自的叙述来揭示,在每一个转折点,潜在的暴力,恐怖和怪诞的令人不安的图像,旨在震惊和惊讶读者。这篇文章展示了坡的《跳蛙》(1849)不仅对作者小说的上述方面进行了富有成效的人类学研究,而且通过对一个半类人猿形象的心理社会进化的视觉化,恰如其分地产生了一种恐怖、暴力和恐怖美学的强化质感,这种形象本身就包含了身体畸形和精神敏锐的极端,这种组合在19世纪的美国既受欢迎又令人恐惧。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emily Dickinson: What Is Called Thinking at the Edge of Chaos? Relational Selves: Gender and Cultural Differences in Moral Reasoning Late Pound: The Case of Canto CVII The Reproduction of Subjectivity and the Turnover-time of Ideology: Speculating with German Idealism, Marx, and Adorno Toward an Ethics of Speculative Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1