TINGKAT BERPIKIR MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF

Annisa Prima Exacta, Krisdianto Hadiprasetyo
{"title":"TINGKAT BERPIKIR MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF","authors":"Annisa Prima Exacta, Krisdianto Hadiprasetyo","doi":"10.20961/JMME.V8I2.25846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : Differences in cognitive styles influence students’ mindset and behavior. Students with Field Independent (FI) cognitive style have different mindset with Field Dependent (FD) students. By identifying cognitive style, lecturer needs to understand the concept of material due to the way in explaining it to students. The objectives of this study are to find out: (1) students’ thinking level in Geometry who have Field Dependent (FD) cognitive style, (2) students’ thinking level in Geometry who have Field Independent (FI) cognitive style. This research is conducted at Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Veteran Bangun Nusantara Sukoharjo in Mathematics Education Department in the academic year of 2017/2018. It is a qualitative descriptive research. Data about thinking levels are obtained from diagnostic tests and interview results, while data on cognitive style are obtained from the results of Group Embedded Figure test (GEFT). Subjects are taken by purposive sampling technique and triangulation method is used as data validation. In analyzing data, the researchers employ some stages consisting of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results reveal that students’ thinking level who have Field Dependent (FD) cognitive style in Geometry course is visualization and pre-analysis, while students’ thinking level who have of Field Independent (FI) cognitive style in Geometry course is visualization, analysis, and informal pre-deduction. Keywords: Thinking Level, Cognitive Style, Field Independent (FI), Field Dependent (FD), Geometry .","PeriodicalId":178617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/JMME.V8I2.25846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract : Differences in cognitive styles influence students’ mindset and behavior. Students with Field Independent (FI) cognitive style have different mindset with Field Dependent (FD) students. By identifying cognitive style, lecturer needs to understand the concept of material due to the way in explaining it to students. The objectives of this study are to find out: (1) students’ thinking level in Geometry who have Field Dependent (FD) cognitive style, (2) students’ thinking level in Geometry who have Field Independent (FI) cognitive style. This research is conducted at Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Veteran Bangun Nusantara Sukoharjo in Mathematics Education Department in the academic year of 2017/2018. It is a qualitative descriptive research. Data about thinking levels are obtained from diagnostic tests and interview results, while data on cognitive style are obtained from the results of Group Embedded Figure test (GEFT). Subjects are taken by purposive sampling technique and triangulation method is used as data validation. In analyzing data, the researchers employ some stages consisting of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results reveal that students’ thinking level who have Field Dependent (FD) cognitive style in Geometry course is visualization and pre-analysis, while students’ thinking level who have of Field Independent (FI) cognitive style in Geometry course is visualization, analysis, and informal pre-deduction. Keywords: Thinking Level, Cognitive Style, Field Independent (FI), Field Dependent (FD), Geometry .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生几何专业的思维水平是由认知风格决定的
摘要:认知风格的差异影响着学生的心态和行为。场独立型认知风格的学生与场依赖型认知风格的学生有着不同的思维方式。通过识别认知风格,讲师需要通过向学生解释材料的方式来理解材料的概念。本研究的目的在于了解:(1)场依赖型认知风格学生的几何思维水平;(2)场独立型认知风格学生的几何思维水平。本研究于2017/2018学年在数学教育系的Veteran Bangun Nusantara Sukoharjo教师培训与教育学院进行。这是一项定性描述性研究。思维水平数据来源于诊断测试和访谈结果,认知风格数据来源于群体嵌入图测试(Group Embedded Figure test, GEFT)结果。研究对象采用目的抽样法,采用三角剖分法进行数据验证。在分析数据时,研究人员采用了数据简化、数据呈现和结论的几个阶段。结果表明,具有场依赖型(FD)认知风格的学生在几何课程中的思维水平为可视化和预分析,而具有场独立型(FI)认知风格的学生在几何课程中的思维水平为可视化、分析和非正式预演绎。关键词:思维水平、认知风格、场独立(FI)、场依赖(FD)、几何
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the students’ engagement in the process of learning Mathematics using a Flipped-classroom approach to Trigonometry Mathematics Achievement - Intelligence Quotient (IQ): A Study of Simple Relations in Class 10 High School Students The Analysis Of Parental Participation In Improving Children's Learning Motivation During The Covid-19 Pandemic Analysis of Metacognitive Ability in Mathematics Problem Solving of SMA Students at Ngemplak Boyolali A Systematic Literature Review on Mathematics Mobile Applications in Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1