College Remediation Goes Back to High School: Evidence from a Statewide Program in Tennessee

ERN: National Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.3386/W26133
Thomas J. Kane, Angela Boatman, Whitney Kozakowski, C. J. Bennett, Rachel Hitch, Dana Weisenfeld
{"title":"College Remediation Goes Back to High School: Evidence from a Statewide Program in Tennessee","authors":"Thomas J. Kane, Angela Boatman, Whitney Kozakowski, C. J. Bennett, Rachel Hitch, Dana Weisenfeld","doi":"10.3386/W26133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many U.S. students arrive on college campus lacking the skills expected for college-level work. As state leaders seek to increase postsecondary enrollment and completion, public colleges have sought to lessen the delays created by remedial course requirements. Tennessee has taken a novel approach by allowing students to complete their remediation requirements in high school. Using both a difference-in-differences and a regression discontinuity design, we evaluate the program’s impact on college enrollment and credit accumulation, finding that the program boosted enrollment in college-level math during the first year of college and allowed students to earn a modest 4.5 additional college credits by their second year. We also report the first causal evidence on remediation's impact on students' math skills, finding that the program did not improve students’ math achievement, nor boost students’ chances of passing college math. Our findings cast doubt on the effectiveness of the current model of remediation—whether in high school or college—in improving students’ math skills. They also suggest that the time cost of remediation—whether pre-requisite or co-requisite remediation—is not the primary barrier causing low degree completion for students with weak math preparation.","PeriodicalId":221919,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W26133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Many U.S. students arrive on college campus lacking the skills expected for college-level work. As state leaders seek to increase postsecondary enrollment and completion, public colleges have sought to lessen the delays created by remedial course requirements. Tennessee has taken a novel approach by allowing students to complete their remediation requirements in high school. Using both a difference-in-differences and a regression discontinuity design, we evaluate the program’s impact on college enrollment and credit accumulation, finding that the program boosted enrollment in college-level math during the first year of college and allowed students to earn a modest 4.5 additional college credits by their second year. We also report the first causal evidence on remediation's impact on students' math skills, finding that the program did not improve students’ math achievement, nor boost students’ chances of passing college math. Our findings cast doubt on the effectiveness of the current model of remediation—whether in high school or college—in improving students’ math skills. They also suggest that the time cost of remediation—whether pre-requisite or co-requisite remediation—is not the primary barrier causing low degree completion for students with weak math preparation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学补课可以追溯到高中:来自田纳西州一个全州项目的证据
许多刚进入大学校园的美国学生缺乏大学水平工作所需的技能。随着各州领导人努力提高高等教育的入学率和结业率,公立大学也在努力减少因补习课程要求而造成的延误。田纳西州采取了一种新颖的方法,允许学生在高中完成补习要求。使用差异中的差异和回归不连续设计,我们评估了该计划对大学入学和学分积累的影响,发现该计划在大学第一年提高了大学水平数学的入学率,并允许学生在第二年获得适度的4.5个额外的大学学分。我们还报告了关于补习对学生数学技能影响的第一个因果证据,发现该计划并没有提高学生的数学成绩,也没有增加学生通过大学数学考试的机会。我们的研究结果对当前的补救模式——无论是在高中还是在大学——在提高学生数学技能方面的有效性提出了质疑。他们还指出,补救的时间成本——无论是先决条件还是共同先决条件的补救——并不是导致数学准备薄弱的学生完成学位低的主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Film Tax Credits Across State Lines The Contestation of the Notion of Debt-Trap Diplomacy on Nigeria-China Relations: The Dilemma and Critical Issues Australian Federalism in James Buchanan's Early Work on Fiscal Equity Convergence across Subnational Regions of Bangladesh – What the Night Lights Data Say? The Effects of Local Government Financial Distress: Evidence from Toxic Loans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1