Level of Sustainable Development in Poland and EU Countries – Analysis with Cluster Stability Measures

Dorota Rozmus
{"title":"Level of Sustainable Development in Poland and EU Countries – Analysis with Cluster Stability Measures","authors":"Dorota Rozmus","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.8375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of taxonomy methods in recent years, a lot of attention is paid to the stability of these methods, i.e. the answer to the question to what extent the structure discovered by a given method is actually present in the data? Many different ways of measuring stability have been proposed in the literature, which are mainly relating to the stability of the final grouping result. Lord et al. (2017) instead proposed a measure of stability for each observation from the data set and the measure of stability for individual groups. In their article, they suggest that an individual measure of stability may indicate noisy observation whereas the stability measure relating to particular groups may indicate clusters of noise which should be removed from the dataset. The aim of the paper is to apply the proposed individual measure of stability and a measure of stability for individual groups to answer the question to what extent Poland is matched the EU in terms of the level of sustainable development.\n\n","PeriodicalId":357447,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Statystyczny","volume":"186 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Statystyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.8375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the context of taxonomy methods in recent years, a lot of attention is paid to the stability of these methods, i.e. the answer to the question to what extent the structure discovered by a given method is actually present in the data? Many different ways of measuring stability have been proposed in the literature, which are mainly relating to the stability of the final grouping result. Lord et al. (2017) instead proposed a measure of stability for each observation from the data set and the measure of stability for individual groups. In their article, they suggest that an individual measure of stability may indicate noisy observation whereas the stability measure relating to particular groups may indicate clusters of noise which should be removed from the dataset. The aim of the paper is to apply the proposed individual measure of stability and a measure of stability for individual groups to answer the question to what extent Poland is matched the EU in terms of the level of sustainable development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰和欧盟国家的可持续发展水平——集群稳定措施分析
在近年来的分类方法中,人们非常关注这些方法的稳定性,即回答给定方法发现的结构在多大程度上实际存在于数据中?文献中提出了许多不同的测量稳定性的方法,这些方法主要与最终分组结果的稳定性有关。Lord等人(2017)提出了对数据集中每个观察值的稳定性度量和对单个组的稳定性度量。在他们的文章中,他们认为单个的稳定性度量可能表明有噪声的观测,而与特定组相关的稳定性度量可能表明应该从数据集中删除的噪声簇。本文的目的是应用拟议的个人稳定措施和个人群体的稳定措施来回答波兰在可持续发展水平方面与欧盟相匹配的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of a priori positive information on the results of voting methods Comparison of the accuracy of forecasts bsed on neural networks before and after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic on the example of selected exchange rates Estimation of Yu and Meyer bivariate stochastic volatility model by iterated filtering Sample size in clinical trials – challenges and approaches Alternative investments during turbulent times comparison of dynamic relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1