Europeanization through EU conditionality: understanding the new era in Turkish foreign policy

Mustafa Aydın, Sinem Akgul Acikmese
{"title":"Europeanization through EU conditionality: understanding the new era in Turkish foreign policy","authors":"Mustafa Aydın, Sinem Akgul Acikmese","doi":"10.1080/14613190701689944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since October 2001, Turkey has embarked upon a process of wide-ranging political reforms through harmonization packages to redress its shortcomings visa-vis the Copenhagen criteria. The Turkish economy has already undergone substantive changes to become a fully functioning market economy and acquire the capacity to cope with competitive pressures. Alongside political and economic changes, Turkish foreign policy (TFP) is also experiencing a transformation as a result of European conditionality. Since the EU’s acceptance of the Turkish candidacy in 1999, TFP has been profoundly altered. For instance, without the prospects of EU accession, it would have been difficult to imagine Turkey opening the doors to internal debate on the ‘Armenian issue’ or the shift in the dialogue on Cyprus from a confrontational line to a ‘win–win’ discourse. Similarly, there was a distinct contrast between Turkey’s attitudes towards Syria in 1998 and Greece in 1999 in response to their support for Abdullah Ocalan. While Syria faced troop mobilization on its border and threats of war should it not expel the leader of the separatist Kurdish group PKK from Damascus, the latter only received a diplomatic reprimand— and not a very strong or sustained one—when it was revealed that Ocalan had been sheltered in the Greek Embassy in Nairobi. What followed in both cases was a ‘spring’ in relations, the former achieved by coercive methods and the latter by a gentle push towards embarrassment. This paper examines TFP in the framework of Europeanization, to find out to what extent this approach is helpful in understanding change in the course of the last decade. First, it offers a brief discussion of the concept of Europeanization as understood in European integration studies, focusing on its domestic dimension. Second, it analyzes modes of change in the foreign policy domain of EU member and candidate countries, showing that foreign policy Europeanization of wouldbe members takes place through the conditionality provided in the CFSP (Common Foreign and Security Policy) acquis. Third, it introduces mechanisms of EU conditionality for foreign policy change in Turkey with specific references to institutional issues, traditionally sensitive foreign policy problems and the neighbouring region of the Middle East. The paper argues that while Europeanization is the major framework for understanding the recent changes","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"109","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190701689944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 109

Abstract

Since October 2001, Turkey has embarked upon a process of wide-ranging political reforms through harmonization packages to redress its shortcomings visa-vis the Copenhagen criteria. The Turkish economy has already undergone substantive changes to become a fully functioning market economy and acquire the capacity to cope with competitive pressures. Alongside political and economic changes, Turkish foreign policy (TFP) is also experiencing a transformation as a result of European conditionality. Since the EU’s acceptance of the Turkish candidacy in 1999, TFP has been profoundly altered. For instance, without the prospects of EU accession, it would have been difficult to imagine Turkey opening the doors to internal debate on the ‘Armenian issue’ or the shift in the dialogue on Cyprus from a confrontational line to a ‘win–win’ discourse. Similarly, there was a distinct contrast between Turkey’s attitudes towards Syria in 1998 and Greece in 1999 in response to their support for Abdullah Ocalan. While Syria faced troop mobilization on its border and threats of war should it not expel the leader of the separatist Kurdish group PKK from Damascus, the latter only received a diplomatic reprimand— and not a very strong or sustained one—when it was revealed that Ocalan had been sheltered in the Greek Embassy in Nairobi. What followed in both cases was a ‘spring’ in relations, the former achieved by coercive methods and the latter by a gentle push towards embarrassment. This paper examines TFP in the framework of Europeanization, to find out to what extent this approach is helpful in understanding change in the course of the last decade. First, it offers a brief discussion of the concept of Europeanization as understood in European integration studies, focusing on its domestic dimension. Second, it analyzes modes of change in the foreign policy domain of EU member and candidate countries, showing that foreign policy Europeanization of wouldbe members takes place through the conditionality provided in the CFSP (Common Foreign and Security Policy) acquis. Third, it introduces mechanisms of EU conditionality for foreign policy change in Turkey with specific references to institutional issues, traditionally sensitive foreign policy problems and the neighbouring region of the Middle East. The paper argues that while Europeanization is the major framework for understanding the recent changes
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟条件下的欧洲化:解读土耳其外交政策的新时代
自2001年10月以来,土耳其通过协调一揽子计划开始了广泛的政治改革进程,以纠正其在哥本哈根标准方面的缺点。土耳其经济已经经历了实质性的变化,成为一个充分运作的市场经济,并获得了应付竞争压力的能力。随着政治和经济的变化,土耳其的外交政策(TFP)也在经历着欧洲条件的转变。自从1999年欧盟接受土耳其的候选资格以来,TFP已经发生了深刻的变化。例如,如果没有加入欧盟的前景,很难想象土耳其会打开关于“亚美尼亚问题”的内部辩论的大门,或者塞浦路斯对话从对抗路线转变为“双赢”话语。同样,1998年土耳其对叙利亚的态度与1999年希腊对阿卜杜拉·奥贾兰(Abdullah Ocalan)的支持的态度有着明显的对比。当叙利亚面临边境上的军队动员和战争威胁时,如果它不将分离主义库尔德工人党领导人驱逐出大马士革,后者只收到了外交谴责——而且不是非常强烈或持续的谴责——当奥贾兰被揭露在希腊驻内罗毕大使馆避难时。在这两种情况下,随之而来的是关系的“春天”,前者是通过强制手段实现的,后者是通过温和地推动尴尬实现的。本文在欧洲化的框架下考察全要素生产率,以找出这种方法在多大程度上有助于理解过去十年的变化。首先,它简要讨论了欧洲一体化研究中所理解的欧洲化概念,重点是其国内维度。其次,分析了欧盟成员国和候选国外交政策领域的变化模式,表明潜在成员国的外交政策欧洲化是通过共同外交与安全政策(CFSP)协议中提供的条件来实现的。第三,它介绍了欧盟对土耳其外交政策变化的条件限制机制,具体涉及制度问题、传统上敏感的外交政策问题和中东邻近地区。本文认为,虽然欧洲化是理解最近变化的主要框架
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders, political behaviour and decision-making: the case of the former President of the Republic of Cyprus, George Vasiliou Understanding banking sector reforms in Turkey: assessing the roles of domestic versus external actors The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem Building institutional, economic and social capacities through discourse: the role of NGOs in the context of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia The Southern European model of immigration: do the cases of Malta, Cyprus and Slovenia fit?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1