Social media content analysis of electronic cigarette information: Implications for public health ethics – A Brief Report

E. Sarwar, Champagne Moore, Karina Corral, Monideepa B. Becerra
{"title":"Social media content analysis of electronic cigarette information: Implications for public health ethics – A Brief Report","authors":"E. Sarwar, Champagne Moore, Karina Corral, Monideepa B. Becerra","doi":"10.22461/jhea.8.7164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to conduct a social media analysis on content related to electronic cigarettes, especially the validity of the information, audience engagement, and emergent ethical issues of health and related information on such a platform. Our results show a majority of the videos on social media platform analyzed were from individuals or organizations for marketing purposes, thus demonstrating a significant gap of needed public health driven content. We further present unique characteristics of popular videos, such as duration, comments, and like to dislike ratios that public health program can mimic to gain acceptance for anti-tobacco initiatives. The lack of information regulation on validity further raises several ethical concerns and we provide recommendations for actions to ensure the audience of such social media platform receive experience an-unbiased view of electronic cigarettes and associated outcomes.","PeriodicalId":164934,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Healthcare Ethics & Administration","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Healthcare Ethics & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22461/jhea.8.7164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct a social media analysis on content related to electronic cigarettes, especially the validity of the information, audience engagement, and emergent ethical issues of health and related information on such a platform. Our results show a majority of the videos on social media platform analyzed were from individuals or organizations for marketing purposes, thus demonstrating a significant gap of needed public health driven content. We further present unique characteristics of popular videos, such as duration, comments, and like to dislike ratios that public health program can mimic to gain acceptance for anti-tobacco initiatives. The lack of information regulation on validity further raises several ethical concerns and we provide recommendations for actions to ensure the audience of such social media platform receive experience an-unbiased view of electronic cigarettes and associated outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子烟信息的社交媒体内容分析:对公共卫生伦理的影响-简要报告
本研究的目的是对与电子烟相关的内容进行社交媒体分析,特别是在这样一个平台上,信息的有效性,受众参与度,以及新兴的健康伦理问题和相关信息。我们的研究结果显示,分析的社交媒体平台上的大多数视频来自个人或组织,用于营销目的,因此表明所需的公共卫生驱动内容存在显着差距。我们进一步提出了流行视频的独特特征,如时长、评论和喜欢不喜欢的比率,公共卫生计划可以模仿这些特征,以获得反烟草倡议的接受。缺乏对有效性的信息监管进一步引发了一些道德问题,我们提供了行动建议,以确保此类社交媒体平台的受众获得对电子烟及其相关结果的公正看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Universal Healthcare: An In-Depth Examination and Proposed Alternatives Evaluation of Capacity in the Hospital Setting and its Long-Term Implications Industry Sponsorship in Dentistry: An Ethics Scoping Review Universal Healthcare: An In-Depth Examination and Proposed Alternatives Evaluation of Capacity in the Hospital Setting and its Long-Term Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1