Aspirations and strategies of Albanian immigrants in Thessaloniki

E. Pratsinakis
{"title":"Aspirations and strategies of Albanian immigrants in Thessaloniki","authors":"E. Pratsinakis","doi":"10.1080/14613190500133284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The bulk of the literature in migration studies is written from a state perspective; very little research positions immigrants centre-stage. When that is the case, it is mostly in relation to the ‘natives’ or to the ‘host society’ in general. Probably this lack of research reflects the mainstream perception of migration, which is not in terms of the immigrants themselves, but is concerned with—some might say problematized by—the states involved. In that sense, although migration emblematically stems from immigrants as key actors, their motivations and dreams are commonly overlooked, and their voices silenced. Furthermore, states set goals, which they attempt to achieve through policies, but rarely are the goals of immigrants taken into consideration. Instead immigrants are depicted in abstract, general terms; they are grouped into homogenous categories, far removed from any notion of immigrants’ subjective goals and dreams. This definitely applies to the Greek context. The immigration policies of Greece are such that, not only are the aspirations of migrants ignored, but also their very real contribution to the country is not acknowledged. This perspective is also reflected in academia, where relevant literature fails to pose questions concerning migrants’ initial and current aspirations. This paper is an attempt to contribute to our understanding of migrants’ aspirations and strategies. The term aspirations refers to immigrants’ wishes and goals, whereas strategies are the practices that they undertake to realize those wishes, but also to cope with everyday hardships. My focus will be on Albanian immigrants in Thessaloniki. I seek to narrate the aspirations of Albanian migrants in Greece and the practices they pursue to materialize them, as well as to trace how these are reconsidered and negotiated through time. What were the pre-migration aspirations, initial expectations and motivations of Albanian immigrants in Greece? What strategies did they pursue, and under the influence of which factors? How did their strategies and aspirations develop through the passing of time and circumstance? How do immigrants evaluate their decision to migrate to Greece and how do they view their stay in the country? Is it conceptualized as a temporary move or as permanent residence? What are their plans for the future and an eventual return to Albania? In my analysis, I acknowledge migration as an instrumental behaviour, as a strategy towards the materialization of aspirations. In that sense immigrants are heterogeneous subjects responding to different aspirations. Yet immigration is a major change that transgresses all aspects of the life-course and therefore","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190500133284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

The bulk of the literature in migration studies is written from a state perspective; very little research positions immigrants centre-stage. When that is the case, it is mostly in relation to the ‘natives’ or to the ‘host society’ in general. Probably this lack of research reflects the mainstream perception of migration, which is not in terms of the immigrants themselves, but is concerned with—some might say problematized by—the states involved. In that sense, although migration emblematically stems from immigrants as key actors, their motivations and dreams are commonly overlooked, and their voices silenced. Furthermore, states set goals, which they attempt to achieve through policies, but rarely are the goals of immigrants taken into consideration. Instead immigrants are depicted in abstract, general terms; they are grouped into homogenous categories, far removed from any notion of immigrants’ subjective goals and dreams. This definitely applies to the Greek context. The immigration policies of Greece are such that, not only are the aspirations of migrants ignored, but also their very real contribution to the country is not acknowledged. This perspective is also reflected in academia, where relevant literature fails to pose questions concerning migrants’ initial and current aspirations. This paper is an attempt to contribute to our understanding of migrants’ aspirations and strategies. The term aspirations refers to immigrants’ wishes and goals, whereas strategies are the practices that they undertake to realize those wishes, but also to cope with everyday hardships. My focus will be on Albanian immigrants in Thessaloniki. I seek to narrate the aspirations of Albanian migrants in Greece and the practices they pursue to materialize them, as well as to trace how these are reconsidered and negotiated through time. What were the pre-migration aspirations, initial expectations and motivations of Albanian immigrants in Greece? What strategies did they pursue, and under the influence of which factors? How did their strategies and aspirations develop through the passing of time and circumstance? How do immigrants evaluate their decision to migrate to Greece and how do they view their stay in the country? Is it conceptualized as a temporary move or as permanent residence? What are their plans for the future and an eventual return to Albania? In my analysis, I acknowledge migration as an instrumental behaviour, as a strategy towards the materialization of aspirations. In that sense immigrants are heterogeneous subjects responding to different aspirations. Yet immigration is a major change that transgresses all aspects of the life-course and therefore
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞萨洛尼基阿尔巴尼亚移民的愿望和策略
移民研究的大部分文献都是从国家的角度写的;很少有研究把移民放在中心位置。在这种情况下,它主要是与“当地人”或“东道国社会”有关。也许这种研究的缺乏反映了对移民的主流看法,这种看法与移民本身无关,而是与有关的国家有关——有人可能会说这是有问题的。从这个意义上说,尽管移民象征性地源于移民作为关键行为者,但他们的动机和梦想通常被忽视,他们的声音被压制。此外,各州设定了目标,并试图通过政策实现这些目标,但很少考虑移民的目标。相反,移民被描述为抽象的,一般的术语;他们被归为同质的类别,与移民的主观目标和梦想相去甚远。这绝对适用于希腊语境。希腊的移民政策不仅忽视了移民的愿望,而且他们对这个国家的真正贡献也没有得到承认。这一观点也反映在学术界,相关文献没有提出有关移民最初和当前愿望的问题。本文试图帮助我们理解移民的愿望和策略。抱负一词指的是移民的愿望和目标,而策略则是他们为实现这些愿望而采取的实践,也是为了应对日常困难。我将重点关注塞萨洛尼基的阿尔巴尼亚移民。我试图讲述在希腊的阿尔巴尼亚移民的愿望,以及他们为实现这些愿望而采取的做法,并追溯这些愿望是如何随着时间的推移而重新考虑和谈判的。阿尔巴尼亚移民在希腊前的愿望、最初的期望和动机是什么?他们采取了什么策略,又受到哪些因素的影响?他们的策略和抱负是如何随着时间和环境的流逝而发展的?移民如何评价他们移民到希腊的决定?他们如何看待他们在希腊的逗留?它的概念是临时迁移还是永久居住?他们对未来和最终返回阿尔巴尼亚有什么计划?在我的分析中,我承认移民是一种工具性行为,是实现愿望的一种战略。从这个意义上说,移民是异质的主体,对不同的愿望做出反应。然而,移民是一个重大的变化,它跨越了生命历程的各个方面,因此
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders, political behaviour and decision-making: the case of the former President of the Republic of Cyprus, George Vasiliou Understanding banking sector reforms in Turkey: assessing the roles of domestic versus external actors The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem Building institutional, economic and social capacities through discourse: the role of NGOs in the context of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia The Southern European model of immigration: do the cases of Malta, Cyprus and Slovenia fit?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1