Formal and integrated strategies for competence development in SMEs

Henrik Kock, Per-Erik Ellström
{"title":"Formal and integrated strategies for competence development in SMEs","authors":"Henrik Kock, Per-Erik Ellström","doi":"10.1108/03090591111095745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to increase understanding of the relationships among the workplace as a learning environment, strategies for competence development used by SMEs and learning outcomes. Specifically, there is a focus on a distinction between formal and integrated strategies for competence development, the conditions under which these strategies are likely to be used, and their effects in terms of individual learning outcomes.Design/methodology/approach – The study was based mainly on questionnaire data collected through a survey of 14 SMEs that had received support from the European Social Fund's Objective 3 programme. In addition, data collected through interviews and analyses of documents were used.Findings – The results indicate interactions between the strategy of competence development used by the firms (formal vs integrated) and the type of learning environment in the workplace (constraining vs enabling). The use of an integrated strategy in an enabling learning environment was the most successful combination in terms of learning outcomes, while the use of an integrated strategy in a constraining learning environment was the least successful combination.Research limitations/implications – There is a need to elaborate the theoretical and empirical basis of the distinction between formal and integrated strategies for competence development, and to study the effects of the two types of strategy, not only for individual learning outcomes, but also for effects at an organisational level.Practical implications – HRD practitioners need to question a traditional reliance on formal training, as the presented results indicate the importance of using competence development strategies that are based on an integration of formal and informal learning.Originality/value – The study indicates that the effects of competence development efforts are likely to be a function not only, nor primarily, of the training methods and strategies that are used, but also of the characteristics of the learning environment of the workplace.","PeriodicalId":181682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Industrial Training","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"93","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Industrial Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591111095745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 93

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to increase understanding of the relationships among the workplace as a learning environment, strategies for competence development used by SMEs and learning outcomes. Specifically, there is a focus on a distinction between formal and integrated strategies for competence development, the conditions under which these strategies are likely to be used, and their effects in terms of individual learning outcomes.Design/methodology/approach – The study was based mainly on questionnaire data collected through a survey of 14 SMEs that had received support from the European Social Fund's Objective 3 programme. In addition, data collected through interviews and analyses of documents were used.Findings – The results indicate interactions between the strategy of competence development used by the firms (formal vs integrated) and the type of learning environment in the workplace (constraining vs enabling). The use of an integrated strategy in an enabling learning environment was the most successful combination in terms of learning outcomes, while the use of an integrated strategy in a constraining learning environment was the least successful combination.Research limitations/implications – There is a need to elaborate the theoretical and empirical basis of the distinction between formal and integrated strategies for competence development, and to study the effects of the two types of strategy, not only for individual learning outcomes, but also for effects at an organisational level.Practical implications – HRD practitioners need to question a traditional reliance on formal training, as the presented results indicate the importance of using competence development strategies that are based on an integration of formal and informal learning.Originality/value – The study indicates that the effects of competence development efforts are likely to be a function not only, nor primarily, of the training methods and strategies that are used, but also of the characteristics of the learning environment of the workplace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中小企业能力发展的正式和综合战略
目的-本文的目的是增加对工作场所作为学习环境,中小企业使用的能力发展战略和学习成果之间关系的理解。具体来说,重点是能力发展的正式策略和综合策略之间的区别,这些策略可能被使用的条件,以及它们对个人学习成果的影响。设计/方法/方法-该研究主要基于对14家中小企业的调查收集的问卷数据,这些中小企业获得了欧洲社会基金目标3计划的支持。此外,还使用了通过访谈和文件分析收集的数据。研究结果-结果表明,公司使用的能力发展战略(正式与整合)与工作场所的学习环境类型(约束与支持)之间存在相互作用。就学习成果而言,在有利的学习环境中使用综合策略是最成功的组合,而在限制性的学习环境中使用综合策略是最不成功的组合。研究局限/启示-有必要详细阐述能力发展的正式战略和综合战略之间区别的理论和实证基础,并研究这两种战略的影响,不仅对个人学习成果,而且对组织层面的影响。实际意义——人力资源开发从业者需要质疑传统上对正式培训的依赖,因为目前的结果表明,使用基于正式和非正式学习整合的能力发展战略的重要性。原创性/价值-研究表明,能力发展努力的效果可能不仅是所使用的培训方法和策略的功能,而且还与工作场所学习环境的特征有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A National Hospitality Curriculum for Turkey Financing Training: Issues and Options. Strategic Human Resource Development. Using English as the common corporate language in a German multinational Learning Culture, Line Manager and HR Professional Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1