More effective interpolations in software model checking

Cong Tian, Zhao Duan, Zhenhua Duan, C. Ong
{"title":"More effective interpolations in software model checking","authors":"Cong Tian, Zhao Duan, Zhenhua Duan, C. Ong","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2017.8115631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An approach to CEGAR-based model checking which has proved to be successful on large models employs Craig interpolation to efficiently construct parsimonious abstractions. Following this design, we introduce new applications, universal safety interpolant and existential error interpolant, of Craig interpolation that can systematically reduce the program state space to be explored for safety verification. Whenever the universal safety interpolant is implied by the current path, all paths emanating from that location are guaranteed to be safe. Dually whenever the existential error interpolant is implied by the current path, there is guaranteed to be an unsafe path from the location. We show how these interpolants are computed and applied in safety verification. We have implemented our approach in a tool named InterpChecker by building on an open source software model checker. Experiments on a large number of benchmark programs show that both the interpolations and the auxiliary optimization strategies are effective in improving scalability of software model checking.","PeriodicalId":382876,"journal":{"name":"2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2017.8115631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

An approach to CEGAR-based model checking which has proved to be successful on large models employs Craig interpolation to efficiently construct parsimonious abstractions. Following this design, we introduce new applications, universal safety interpolant and existential error interpolant, of Craig interpolation that can systematically reduce the program state space to be explored for safety verification. Whenever the universal safety interpolant is implied by the current path, all paths emanating from that location are guaranteed to be safe. Dually whenever the existential error interpolant is implied by the current path, there is guaranteed to be an unsafe path from the location. We show how these interpolants are computed and applied in safety verification. We have implemented our approach in a tool named InterpChecker by building on an open source software model checker. Experiments on a large number of benchmark programs show that both the interpolations and the auxiliary optimization strategies are effective in improving scalability of software model checking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在软件模型检查中更有效的插值
一种基于cegar的模型检验方法利用克雷格插值有效地构造简约的抽象,在大型模型上取得了成功。在此设计基础上,我们引入了Craig插值的新应用,即通用安全插值和存在误差插值,它们可以系统地减少需要探索的程序状态空间以进行安全验证。只要当前路径隐含了通用安全插值,那么从该位置发出的所有路径都保证是安全的。双重地,只要当前路径暗示存在错误插值,就保证从该位置出发有一条不安全的路径。我们展示了这些插值是如何计算和应用在安全验证。我们已经在一个名为InterpChecker的工具中实现了我们的方法,它建立在一个开源软件模型检查器上。在大量基准程序上的实验表明,插值和辅助优化策略都能有效地提高软件模型检测的可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TiQi: A natural language interface for querying software project data A comprehensive study on real world concurrency bugs in Node.js Managing software evolution through semantic history slicing Software performance self-adaptation through efficient model predictive control Privacy-aware data-intensive applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1