The effect of two low-level laser irradiation protocols on molar anchorage loss (A randomized controlled clinical trial)

F. Eid, Walid El-Kenany, Mohamed I. Mowafy, Ahmed R. Elkalza, Myriam Guindi
{"title":"The effect of two low-level laser irradiation protocols on molar anchorage loss (A randomized controlled clinical trial)","authors":"F. Eid, Walid El-Kenany, Mohamed I. Mowafy, Ahmed R. Elkalza, Myriam Guindi","doi":"10.21608/eos.2021.106120.1036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been found to accelerate the rate of tooth movement, which in turn may aid in preserving posterior anchorage. However, one of the drawbacks of LLLT, is the high frequency of patient recall. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the amount of molar anchorage loss accompanying canine retraction, by employing two LLLT protocols, involving a high and a low application frequency. Materials and Methods: Sixteen patients were enrolled, in which the therapeutic extraction of maxillary 1st premolars was required for orthodontic treatment, with subsequent canine retraction. Patients were equally and randomly divided into 2 groups. In Group A, LLLT was randomly administered to one side of the maxillary arch on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and then every 2 weeks, while in Group B, one side of the maxillary arch was randomly selected for LLLT application every 3 weeks. The administered LLLT was a Diode laser with a 980 nm wavelength. Canine retraction was carried out using closed-coil springs, with 150 grams of force, and the amount of mesial molar movement was checked every 3 weeks, over the 12-week study period. Results: Equivalent amounts of mesial molar movements have been displayed with and without LLLT application, in both study groups. Also, no significant differences have been documented between the laser sides in groups A and B. Conclusion: Molar anchorage has not been augmented by LLLT, whether applied with a high frequency, or with less frequent applications coinciding with the follow-up visits.","PeriodicalId":305086,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2021.106120.1036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been found to accelerate the rate of tooth movement, which in turn may aid in preserving posterior anchorage. However, one of the drawbacks of LLLT, is the high frequency of patient recall. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the amount of molar anchorage loss accompanying canine retraction, by employing two LLLT protocols, involving a high and a low application frequency. Materials and Methods: Sixteen patients were enrolled, in which the therapeutic extraction of maxillary 1st premolars was required for orthodontic treatment, with subsequent canine retraction. Patients were equally and randomly divided into 2 groups. In Group A, LLLT was randomly administered to one side of the maxillary arch on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and then every 2 weeks, while in Group B, one side of the maxillary arch was randomly selected for LLLT application every 3 weeks. The administered LLLT was a Diode laser with a 980 nm wavelength. Canine retraction was carried out using closed-coil springs, with 150 grams of force, and the amount of mesial molar movement was checked every 3 weeks, over the 12-week study period. Results: Equivalent amounts of mesial molar movements have been displayed with and without LLLT application, in both study groups. Also, no significant differences have been documented between the laser sides in groups A and B. Conclusion: Molar anchorage has not been augmented by LLLT, whether applied with a high frequency, or with less frequent applications coinciding with the follow-up visits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种低强度激光照射对磨牙支抗丢失的影响(一项随机对照临床试验)
目的:低水平激光治疗(LLLT)可以加快牙齿的移动速度,从而有助于保留后牙支抗。然而,LLLT的缺点之一是患者回忆频率高。本研究的目的是通过采用两种LLLT方案,包括高频率和低频率的应用,评估和比较磨牙支抗损失的数量。材料与方法:16例患者在正畸治疗中需要拔除上颌第一前磨牙,随后犬牙内收。患者平均随机分为两组。A组在第0、3、7、14天随机在上颌弓一侧施用LLLT,然后每2周施用一次;B组每3周随机选择上颌弓一侧施用LLLT。给药的LLLT是波长为980 nm的二极管激光器。在12周的研究期间,犬只使用封闭弹簧进行150克力的牵出,每3周检查一次中磨牙的移动量。结果:在两个研究组中,使用和不使用LLLT均显示出等量的中磨牙运动。此外,在A组和b组激光侧之间没有明显差异。结论:无论是高频应用,还是在随访期间较少使用,LLLT都没有增强磨牙支抗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison Of Different Imaging Software For Measuring Volume Of The Maxillary Sinus Splint-Supported Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device Versus Class II Intermaxillary elastics For The Correction Of Class II Malocclusion ; A Retrospective Study Effect Of White Spot Lesion Pretreatment With Silver Diamine Fluoride Compared To Diode Laser On The Shear Bond Strength Of Orthodontic Brackets. An In-Vitro Study Association Of Soft Tissue Facial Form & Dental Arch Form: A Cross Sectional Comparative Study Association Of Molar Angulation With Anterior Crowding And Dental Inclinations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1