Days Worked and Seasonality Patterns of Work in Eighteenth Century Denmark

P. Jensen, C. Radu, P. Sharp
{"title":"Days Worked and Seasonality Patterns of Work in Eighteenth Century Denmark","authors":"P. Jensen, C. Radu, P. Sharp","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3444872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The calculation of the number of days worked per year is crucial for understanding pre-industrial living standards, and yet has presented considerable obstacles due to data scarcity. We present evidence on days worked and seasonality patterns of work using evidence from a large database of micro-level labor market data for eighteenth century rural Denmark. We estimate that workers worked approximately 5.6 days per week when under full employment. Seasonality of work meant, however, that they were unlikely to find employment during the winter, bringing the estimated number of working days per year to 184. This is lower than often assumed in the literature on real wage calculations, but in line with recent evidence for Malmo and London. We find that days worked increased over the eighteenth century, consistent with the idea of an “industrious revolution”. We suggest however that this was probably mostly due to economic necessity rather than a consumer revolution, since unskilled and low skilled workers needed to work over 300 days per year to afford a subsistence basket.","PeriodicalId":170522,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions (Topic)","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3444872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The calculation of the number of days worked per year is crucial for understanding pre-industrial living standards, and yet has presented considerable obstacles due to data scarcity. We present evidence on days worked and seasonality patterns of work using evidence from a large database of micro-level labor market data for eighteenth century rural Denmark. We estimate that workers worked approximately 5.6 days per week when under full employment. Seasonality of work meant, however, that they were unlikely to find employment during the winter, bringing the estimated number of working days per year to 184. This is lower than often assumed in the literature on real wage calculations, but in line with recent evidence for Malmo and London. We find that days worked increased over the eighteenth century, consistent with the idea of an “industrious revolution”. We suggest however that this was probably mostly due to economic necessity rather than a consumer revolution, since unskilled and low skilled workers needed to work over 300 days per year to afford a subsistence basket.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18世纪丹麦的工作天数和季节性工作模式
每年工作天数的计算对于了解工业化前的生活水平至关重要,但由于数据稀缺,这一计算存在相当大的障碍。我们利用来自18世纪丹麦农村微观层面劳动力市场数据的大型数据库的证据,提供了工作天数和季节性模式的证据。我们估计,在充分就业的情况下,工人每周大约工作5.6天。但是,工作的季节性意味着他们不太可能在冬季找到工作,因此每年的估计工作日数为184天。这比实际工资计算文献中通常假设的要低,但与马尔默和伦敦最近的证据一致。我们发现,在18世纪,工作日数增加了,这与“勤劳革命”的概念是一致的。然而,我们认为这可能主要是由于经济需要而不是消费革命,因为非熟练工人和低技能工人每年需要工作300多天才能负担得起生活必需品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Un indice OEE per la stampa delle banconote in Banca d’Italia (An OEE index for the Bank of Italy’s Banknote Production Plant) The Retirement Age and the Pension System, the Labor Market and the Economy (Wiek emerytalny a system emerytalny, rynek pracy i gospodarka) Outsourcing, Inequality and Aggregate Output Swiss National League Goalie Analysis Gender Discrimination? Evidence from the Belgian Public Accounting Profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1