Achieving the competencies of an educational researcher

R. Khan
{"title":"Achieving the competencies of an educational researcher","authors":"R. Khan","doi":"10.53708/hpej.v4i2.1442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a long journey to become a competent educational researcher. The researcher requires both technical and non-technical competencies to become a skilled researcher (Baral, 2021). This editorial does not address the assessment and entrustment of these competencies. Rather it focuses on the competencies required to become an educational researcher. This includes conduct of research, research skills at the workplace, discipline-specific knowledge, professionalism, communication skills, critical thinking, leadership, management, and job market skills. \nThe conduct of research is the practice of scientific investigation with integrity(Iqbal, 2021). It includes but is not limited to collaboration, managing conflicts of interests and commitments, data acquisition and its management, human research protection, mentoring, peer review, publication practices, and research misconduct whereas research skills at the workplace include searching for information, taking notes, time management, problem-solving and communicating results(Marks-Maran, 2015). Can we analyze and systematically develop these research skills? The answer is yes. The Research Skills Development framework developed by John and Kerry is a tool that can analyze and plan a curriculum for the systematic development of research skills (Hendriarto, Mursidi, Kalbuana, Aini, & Aslan, 2021). The framework is based on different facets of student research: curious, determined, discerning, harmonizing, creative, and constructive. These facets vary at different stages of students’ autonomy of researching skills: prescribed, scaffolding, open-ended, and unbounded researching (Willison & O’Regan, 2007).","PeriodicalId":338468,"journal":{"name":"Health Professions Educator Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Professions Educator Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53708/hpej.v4i2.1442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is a long journey to become a competent educational researcher. The researcher requires both technical and non-technical competencies to become a skilled researcher (Baral, 2021). This editorial does not address the assessment and entrustment of these competencies. Rather it focuses on the competencies required to become an educational researcher. This includes conduct of research, research skills at the workplace, discipline-specific knowledge, professionalism, communication skills, critical thinking, leadership, management, and job market skills. The conduct of research is the practice of scientific investigation with integrity(Iqbal, 2021). It includes but is not limited to collaboration, managing conflicts of interests and commitments, data acquisition and its management, human research protection, mentoring, peer review, publication practices, and research misconduct whereas research skills at the workplace include searching for information, taking notes, time management, problem-solving and communicating results(Marks-Maran, 2015). Can we analyze and systematically develop these research skills? The answer is yes. The Research Skills Development framework developed by John and Kerry is a tool that can analyze and plan a curriculum for the systematic development of research skills (Hendriarto, Mursidi, Kalbuana, Aini, & Aslan, 2021). The framework is based on different facets of student research: curious, determined, discerning, harmonizing, creative, and constructive. These facets vary at different stages of students’ autonomy of researching skills: prescribed, scaffolding, open-ended, and unbounded researching (Willison & O’Regan, 2007).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
达到教育研究者的能力
成为一名称职的教育研究者是一个漫长的过程。研究人员需要技术和非技术能力才能成为一名熟练的研究人员(Baral, 2021)。这篇社论不涉及这些能力的评估和委托。相反,它侧重于成为一名教育研究者所需的能力。这包括研究行为、工作场所的研究技能、学科特定知识、专业精神、沟通技巧、批判性思维、领导力、管理和就业市场技能。研究行为是诚信的科学调查实践(Iqbal, 2021)。它包括但不限于合作、管理利益冲突和承诺、数据获取及其管理、人类研究保护、指导、同行评审、出版实践和研究不端行为,而工作场所的研究技能包括搜索信息、记笔记、时间管理、解决问题和交流结果(Marks-Maran, 2015)。我们能分析并系统地发展这些研究技能吗?答案是肯定的。John和Kerry开发的研究技能发展框架是一种工具,可以分析和规划研究技能系统发展的课程(Hendriarto, Mursidi, Kalbuana, Aini, & Aslan, 2021)。该框架基于学生研究的不同方面:好奇、坚定、辨别力、协调、创造性和建设性。这些方面在学生自主研究技能的不同阶段有所不同:规定的、脚手架式的、开放式的和无限制的研究(Willison & O ' regan, 2007)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gender Bias Existence: A Qualitative Exploration of Dental Students’ Perception of the Impact of their Gender on Learning in Clinical Practice Perception of Undergraduate Students about Bedside Teaching: Experience at a Private Medical College Bridging the Gap Between Humanities and Health Sciences – Practices and Recommendations Difficulties faced by Medical Students of Southern Punjab in E-Learning during COVID-19. A Cross-Sectional Study The Missing Piece in Clinical Assessment: Interdependence and Team Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1