Influence of Bucket Shape and Kinetic Energy on Breastshot Waterwheel Performance

Budiarso, Warjito, Jonathan Sahat Pps, D. Adanta, A. Prakoso
{"title":"Influence of Bucket Shape and Kinetic Energy on Breastshot Waterwheel Performance","authors":"Budiarso, Warjito, Jonathan Sahat Pps, D. Adanta, A. Prakoso","doi":"10.1109/ICSTC.2018.8528692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nearly 10% of people in Indonesia do not have energy access because the energy sources are far away from where they live. Breastshot waterwheels represent a solution for this problem because they allow water energy potency up to 19 GW. To enable the use of waterwheels, this study develops a simple bucket shape that is easy to manufacture, considering its efficiency, and tests whether the kinetic energy contributes to the energy conversion process. There are three possible bucket shapes, namely straight, circular and thick. The computational fluid dynamic (CFD) method is a simulation approach used for determining the features of physical phenomena with six degrees of freedom (6 DoF). The study results show that the straight bucket has a better efficiency than other buckets do; the numerical results illustrate that this bucket has higher rotation and torsion than the others do. The straight bucket generates 120 W of power, with a potential energy of 318.8 W and efficiency of 37.6%. For the circular bucket, the power generated is 43.05 W, with an efficiency of 13.5%; this is better than the results for the thick bucket, which generates 19.3 W with an efficiency of 6%. Two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) without replication is used to determine the effect of the energy kinetic (inlet velocity) on the energy conversion process, and it shows no effect. Consequently, the breastshot waterwheel is classified as a reaction turbine. Thus, the straight bucket is recommended for use due to its higher generated power and easier manufacture compared with the other bucket shapes.","PeriodicalId":196768,"journal":{"name":"2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST)","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTC.2018.8528692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Nearly 10% of people in Indonesia do not have energy access because the energy sources are far away from where they live. Breastshot waterwheels represent a solution for this problem because they allow water energy potency up to 19 GW. To enable the use of waterwheels, this study develops a simple bucket shape that is easy to manufacture, considering its efficiency, and tests whether the kinetic energy contributes to the energy conversion process. There are three possible bucket shapes, namely straight, circular and thick. The computational fluid dynamic (CFD) method is a simulation approach used for determining the features of physical phenomena with six degrees of freedom (6 DoF). The study results show that the straight bucket has a better efficiency than other buckets do; the numerical results illustrate that this bucket has higher rotation and torsion than the others do. The straight bucket generates 120 W of power, with a potential energy of 318.8 W and efficiency of 37.6%. For the circular bucket, the power generated is 43.05 W, with an efficiency of 13.5%; this is better than the results for the thick bucket, which generates 19.3 W with an efficiency of 6%. Two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) without replication is used to determine the effect of the energy kinetic (inlet velocity) on the energy conversion process, and it shows no effect. Consequently, the breastshot waterwheel is classified as a reaction turbine. Thus, the straight bucket is recommended for use due to its higher generated power and easier manufacture compared with the other bucket shapes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斗形和动能对胸射水车性能的影响
印度尼西亚有近10%的人没有能源,因为能源来源离他们居住的地方很远。胸射水车代表了这个问题的解决方案,因为它们允许水能高达19吉瓦。为了使水车能够使用,本研究考虑到其效率,开发了一种易于制造的简单桶形,并测试了动能是否有助于能量转换过程。有三种可能的桶形,即直、圆和厚。计算流体动力学(CFD)方法是一种用于确定六自由度物理现象特征的模拟方法。研究结果表明:直斗比其他形式的铲斗具有更好的效率;数值结果表明,该铲斗具有较高的旋转和扭转性能。直斗产生功率120w,势能318.8 W,效率37.6%。圆斗发电功率为43.05 W,效率为13.5%;这比厚桶的结果要好,厚桶产生19.3 W,效率为6%。采用无重复的双因素方差分析(ANOVA)来确定能量动力学(入口速度)对能量转换过程的影响,结果表明没有影响。因此,胸射式水轮被归类为反应式水轮机。因此,与其他铲斗形状相比,建议使用直斗,因为它产生的功率更高,更容易制造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blade Depth Investigation on Cross-flow Turbine by Numerical Method Metal Oxide Semiconductor Based Electronic Nose as Classification and Prediction Instrument for Nicotine Concentration in Unflavoured Electronic Juice An Improved Implementation of Discretization Algorithm for Markov Reward Models Analysis of the Effects of Overflow Leakage Phenomenon on Archimedes Turbine Efficiency Analysis of Mental Workload in Human Resource Department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1