{"title":"Neither Enemies nor Friends: Latinos, Blacks, Afro-Latinos","authors":"Anani Dzidzienyo, S. Oboler, Sapna Shah","doi":"10.5860/choice.43-3718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"While the stigma of blackness is similar throughout the hemisphere, the experience of blackness is heterogeneous depending on historical and cultural characteristics as well as the demographic of each country\" (16). The essays included in Anani Dzidzienyo and Suzanne Oboler's Neither Enemies nor Friends explore the idea that \"blackness\" means different things to different populations. By exploring these distinctions within Latin America and the United States, the essays deepen the discourse on racial dynamics abroad and describe the implications for African American-Latino relations at home. A powerful read, the book is a sharp addition to the understanding of African American-Latino relations. Not only does it discuss the challenges facing collaboration, but it questions how they came to be. The contradictory frameworks underlying race relations in Latin America and the United States are systematically questioned and deemed problematic. Each dynamic is exposed for being responsible for many dilemmas facing African American-Latino cooperation today. Wide in its scope and successful in its argument, the collection's only limitation is not addressing the process by which a Latin American immigrant transitions from his native understanding of racial identity to that which confronts him in the United States. Divided into three main sections, each piece of the book approaches this topic from a different angle. While the first section contains the editors' analysis of the dialogue that is about to appear, the second section explores the politics and process by which race is constructed across Latin America, and the third delves into political and economic coalition building between African Americans and Latinos in the United States. The essays of the second section begin with the unquestioned premise among Latin Americans that, unlike their northern counterparts, they are free of racist prejudices. Proud that they have never had race-based discrimination embedded in the rule of law, Latin Americans emphasize national unity. The overarching assumption is that, in stark contrast to the race obsession in the United States, Latin Americans are color blind, and class and gender are the main social organizing principles on the continent. Yet these essays flip this widely held belief on its head. Systematically, they show that it is the lack of race-based societal discourse that allows color-coded hierarchies to perpetuate. As editors Suzanne Oboler and Anani Dzidzienyo argue in their opening essay, the value placed on the idealized conception of mestizaje, or that the populations are of mixed race, \"has led to the neglect of racial difference as a significant aspect of social experience\" (8). When Afro-Latinos seek to illuminate these patterns of discrimination, they are met with accusations of trying to subvert national interest. In his essay, \"Afro-Ecuadorian Responses to Racism: Between Citizenship and Corporatism,\" Carlos de la Torre observes that Afro-Ecuadorian responses to racism and efforts to overcome inequality are often based on paternalism and individual relationships. The results are \"individual accommodation over the collective struggle for citizenship\" (62), with minimal reduction of structural inequalities. He notes, though, that the Ecuadorian government has recognized the need to create a unitary Black movement. In contrast, in \"The Foreignness of Racism: Pride and Prejudice Among Peru's Limenos in the 1990s,\" Suzanne Oboler remarks that tying a Black movement to the political power dynamic in Peru has been difficult. When they are generated, suggestions to improve the status of Blacks in society are suggested in individual terms, not structural ones. One of the highlights of this section is Mark Anderson's \"Bad Boys and Peaceful Garifuna: Transnational Encounters Between Racial Stereotypes of Honduras and the United States.\" This essay is an exploration of the Garifuna of Honduras, which, like Ecuador and Peru, lacks overtly constructed identities based on race. …","PeriodicalId":304377,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Journal of African American Public Policy","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"108","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Journal of African American Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-3718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 108
Abstract
"While the stigma of blackness is similar throughout the hemisphere, the experience of blackness is heterogeneous depending on historical and cultural characteristics as well as the demographic of each country" (16). The essays included in Anani Dzidzienyo and Suzanne Oboler's Neither Enemies nor Friends explore the idea that "blackness" means different things to different populations. By exploring these distinctions within Latin America and the United States, the essays deepen the discourse on racial dynamics abroad and describe the implications for African American-Latino relations at home. A powerful read, the book is a sharp addition to the understanding of African American-Latino relations. Not only does it discuss the challenges facing collaboration, but it questions how they came to be. The contradictory frameworks underlying race relations in Latin America and the United States are systematically questioned and deemed problematic. Each dynamic is exposed for being responsible for many dilemmas facing African American-Latino cooperation today. Wide in its scope and successful in its argument, the collection's only limitation is not addressing the process by which a Latin American immigrant transitions from his native understanding of racial identity to that which confronts him in the United States. Divided into three main sections, each piece of the book approaches this topic from a different angle. While the first section contains the editors' analysis of the dialogue that is about to appear, the second section explores the politics and process by which race is constructed across Latin America, and the third delves into political and economic coalition building between African Americans and Latinos in the United States. The essays of the second section begin with the unquestioned premise among Latin Americans that, unlike their northern counterparts, they are free of racist prejudices. Proud that they have never had race-based discrimination embedded in the rule of law, Latin Americans emphasize national unity. The overarching assumption is that, in stark contrast to the race obsession in the United States, Latin Americans are color blind, and class and gender are the main social organizing principles on the continent. Yet these essays flip this widely held belief on its head. Systematically, they show that it is the lack of race-based societal discourse that allows color-coded hierarchies to perpetuate. As editors Suzanne Oboler and Anani Dzidzienyo argue in their opening essay, the value placed on the idealized conception of mestizaje, or that the populations are of mixed race, "has led to the neglect of racial difference as a significant aspect of social experience" (8). When Afro-Latinos seek to illuminate these patterns of discrimination, they are met with accusations of trying to subvert national interest. In his essay, "Afro-Ecuadorian Responses to Racism: Between Citizenship and Corporatism," Carlos de la Torre observes that Afro-Ecuadorian responses to racism and efforts to overcome inequality are often based on paternalism and individual relationships. The results are "individual accommodation over the collective struggle for citizenship" (62), with minimal reduction of structural inequalities. He notes, though, that the Ecuadorian government has recognized the need to create a unitary Black movement. In contrast, in "The Foreignness of Racism: Pride and Prejudice Among Peru's Limenos in the 1990s," Suzanne Oboler remarks that tying a Black movement to the political power dynamic in Peru has been difficult. When they are generated, suggestions to improve the status of Blacks in society are suggested in individual terms, not structural ones. One of the highlights of this section is Mark Anderson's "Bad Boys and Peaceful Garifuna: Transnational Encounters Between Racial Stereotypes of Honduras and the United States." This essay is an exploration of the Garifuna of Honduras, which, like Ecuador and Peru, lacks overtly constructed identities based on race. …
“虽然整个半球对黑人的污名都是相似的,但黑人的经历是不同的,这取决于每个国家的历史和文化特征以及人口结构”(16)。Anani Dzidzienyo和Suzanne Oboler的《非敌非友》(non - enemy or - friend)一书中的文章探讨了“黑”对不同人群的含义不同。通过探索拉丁美洲和美国内部的这些差异,这些文章加深了对国外种族动态的论述,并描述了非洲裔美国人和拉丁裔美国人在国内关系的影响。这本书读起来很有力量,对非洲裔美国人和拉丁裔美国人的关系有了深刻的理解。它不仅讨论了协作所面临的挑战,还质疑了它们是如何产生的。拉丁美洲和美国种族关系背后的矛盾框架受到系统的质疑,并被认为是有问题的。每一种动力都暴露出对今天非洲-拉丁美洲合作面临的许多困境负有责任。这个作品集的范围很广,论点也很成功,但它唯一的局限是没有解决一个拉美移民从他对种族身份的本土理解过渡到他在美国所面临的理解的过程。本书分为三个主要部分,每一部分都从不同的角度探讨这个主题。第一部分包含了编辑对即将出现的对话的分析,第二部分探讨了整个拉丁美洲种族建构的政治和过程,第三部分深入研究了美国非洲裔美国人和拉丁裔美国人之间建立的政治和经济联盟。第二部分的文章从拉丁美洲人的一个毋庸置疑的前提开始,与他们的北方同行不同,他们没有种族主义偏见。拉丁美洲人以从未将种族歧视嵌入法治而自豪,他们强调民族团结。最重要的假设是,与美国人对种族的痴迷形成鲜明对比的是,拉丁美洲人是色盲,阶级和性别是这片大陆上主要的社会组织原则。然而,这些文章颠覆了人们普遍持有的观点。他们系统地表明,正是由于缺乏以种族为基础的社会话语,才使得以肤色划分的等级制度得以延续。正如编辑Suzanne Oboler和Anani Dzidzienyo在他们的开场文章中所说的那样,对理想化的混血概念的重视,或者人口是混合种族,“导致了对种族差异作为社会经验的一个重要方面的忽视”(8)。当非裔拉丁美洲人试图阐明这些歧视模式时,他们遭到了试图颠覆国家利益的指责。Carlos de la Torre在他的文章《非裔厄瓜多尔人对种族主义的反应:介于公民与社团主义之间》中指出,非裔厄瓜多尔人对种族主义的反应和克服不平等的努力往往基于家长式作风和个人关系。其结果是“个人的迁就超过了为公民身份而进行的集体斗争”(62),而结构性不平等的减少却微乎其微。不过,他指出,厄瓜多尔政府已经认识到有必要建立一个统一的黑人运动。相比之下,在《种族主义的异域性:20世纪90年代秘鲁利马人的傲慢与偏见》一书中,苏珊娜·奥博勒(Suzanne Oboler)评论说,将黑人运动与秘鲁的政治权力动态联系起来是很困难的。当它们产生时,提高黑人社会地位的建议是从个体角度提出的,而不是从结构角度提出的。本节的亮点之一是马克·安德森的《坏男孩与和平的加利福纳:洪都拉斯与美国种族刻板印象的跨国相遇》。这篇文章是对洪都拉斯加里富纳的探索,洪都拉斯和厄瓜多尔、秘鲁一样,缺乏基于种族的明显建构的身份认同。…