Categorisation of digital tools for co-creation of public open spaces. Key aspects and possibilities

Ina Šuklje Erjavec, Vita Žlender
{"title":"Categorisation of digital tools for co-creation of public open spaces. Key aspects and possibilities","authors":"Ina Šuklje Erjavec, Vita Žlender","doi":"10.24140/2020-SCT-VOL.4-2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information and communication technologies (ICT) have the potential to contribute to the quality and attractiveness of public open spaces and to promote their inclusiveness through a co-creating approach, when ICT tools are used with consideration. There are many different digital tools available and all the time new ones are being developed. However, there is no scholarly consensus on which types of ICT tools are best to use in a specific stage of the co-creation process to effectively support the spatial planning process. This chapter explores the literature and discusses technological and spatial quality as well as user-related aspects of different types of digital tools. Our objective is to define the basis to better understand the different potential of digital tools to meet the needs of people and be useful for all the parties involved in the co-creation process with the focus on planning and development aspects of the quality of public open places. The chapter addresses the challenges faced by urban planners and designers when they wish to integrateICT into the process of planning and design and the complexity of the User – ICT – POS interlink. It also explains stating points for a categorization of digital tools for co-creation. Finally, it proposes a framework for classification of digital tools for co-creation. It also takes up the challenge of identifying the criteria for the assessment of existing ICT tools, their features, added values, suitability and usefulness at a particular stage of the public open space co-creation and development process, as well as paving the way for further analyses of their advantages and disadvantages in comparison to analogue tools.","PeriodicalId":214794,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Territory","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Territory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24140/2020-SCT-VOL.4-2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Information and communication technologies (ICT) have the potential to contribute to the quality and attractiveness of public open spaces and to promote their inclusiveness through a co-creating approach, when ICT tools are used with consideration. There are many different digital tools available and all the time new ones are being developed. However, there is no scholarly consensus on which types of ICT tools are best to use in a specific stage of the co-creation process to effectively support the spatial planning process. This chapter explores the literature and discusses technological and spatial quality as well as user-related aspects of different types of digital tools. Our objective is to define the basis to better understand the different potential of digital tools to meet the needs of people and be useful for all the parties involved in the co-creation process with the focus on planning and development aspects of the quality of public open places. The chapter addresses the challenges faced by urban planners and designers when they wish to integrateICT into the process of planning and design and the complexity of the User – ICT – POS interlink. It also explains stating points for a categorization of digital tools for co-creation. Finally, it proposes a framework for classification of digital tools for co-creation. It also takes up the challenge of identifying the criteria for the assessment of existing ICT tools, their features, added values, suitability and usefulness at a particular stage of the public open space co-creation and development process, as well as paving the way for further analyses of their advantages and disadvantages in comparison to analogue tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同创造公共开放空间的数字工具分类。关键方面和可能性
信息和通信技术(ICT)有可能有助于提高公共开放空间的质量和吸引力,并通过共同创造的方式促进其包容性,如果考虑到ICT工具的使用。有许多不同的数字工具可用,并且一直在开发新的工具。然而,在共同创造过程的特定阶段,哪种类型的ICT工具最适合用于有效支持空间规划过程,目前尚无学术共识。本章探讨了文献,讨论了不同类型的数字工具的技术和空间质量以及与用户相关的方面。我们的目标是定义基础,以更好地了解数字工具的不同潜力,以满足人们的需求,并为参与共同创造过程的所有各方提供有用的工具,重点是公共开放场所质量的规划和发展方面。本章讨论了当城市规划者和设计师希望将信息通信技术整合到规划和设计过程以及用户-信息通信技术- POS互连的复杂性时所面临的挑战。它还解释了用于共同创造的数字工具分类的要点。最后,提出了一个用于共同创造的数字工具分类框架。此外,本研究亦负责厘定评估现有资讯及通讯科技工具的准则,以评估这些工具的特点、附加价值、在公共开放空间共同创造和发展过程的特定阶段的适用性和实用性,并为进一步分析这些工具与模拟工具相比的优缺点作好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web 2.0 tools as framework for participation and co-creation Public Spaces, spaces of public domain: Icons of a contemporary simulacrum? Modifying and co-creating the urban soundscape through digital technologies Exploring co-creation as a learning process to (re)think public space from a transformative perspective Use and appropriation as the everyday design of public space in the Bexiga Neighbourhood (são paulo)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1