Comparision of predicted and actual treatment outcome based on steiner cephalometric analysis using nemotech software

S. Verma, Rigzing O. Lepcha, Rohit Khanna, T. Tikku, R. Maurya, K. Srivastava
{"title":"Comparision of predicted and actual treatment outcome based on steiner cephalometric analysis using nemotech software","authors":"S. Verma, Rigzing O. Lepcha, Rohit Khanna, T. Tikku, R. Maurya, K. Srivastava","doi":"10.18231/j.ijodr.2022.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social and psychological concerns, improved function, appearance, and self-esteem encourages a patient to pursue Orthodontic treatment, for which extraction may or may not be needed.Conventionally steiner stick analysis or tweed head plate correction is followed to decide extraction during fixed orthodontic treatment for desirable treatment outcome. This study was designed to compare predicted position and angulation of maxillary and mandibular incisor by steiner stick analysis with the actual treatment outcome using memotech software.Sample was taken from our department consisting of pre and post treatment lateral cephalogram of 15 subject with age ranging from 20- 22years. Tracing was done using Nemotech software and values for Steiner’s analysis was obtained, both for, pre and post treatment tracing. Prediction was done by Steiner Stick analysis(SSA) on the pre treatment tracing.The position and angulation of Maxillary and Mandibular incisor was compared between prediction based on SSA and post treatment outcome. The parameters taken were U1-NA Linear and U1-NA angular and L1-NB Linear and L1-NB angular and comparison were made using Paired Student T test.: No significant difference was seen in U1-NA distance in (mm) and angulation(degree) Compared between predicted values(U1-NA- 2.478mm, 20.53 degree) and post treatment outcome (U1-NA-2.80mm, 22.733 degree) , p>0.05. Similarly no significant difference was seen in L1-NB distance (mm) compared between predicted (L1-NB 3.1227mm) and post treatment outcome(3.487 mm), p>0.05. However significant difference was seen for L1-NB angulation between predicted (22.573) and actual post treatment outcome(26.02), p<0.05.: Steiner Stick Analysis overestimated the values for angulation for Mandibular Incisors. This could be attributed to variability in mechanics or small size sample. Further studies should aim at comparisons done in larger sample size.","PeriodicalId":269485,"journal":{"name":"IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.2022.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social and psychological concerns, improved function, appearance, and self-esteem encourages a patient to pursue Orthodontic treatment, for which extraction may or may not be needed.Conventionally steiner stick analysis or tweed head plate correction is followed to decide extraction during fixed orthodontic treatment for desirable treatment outcome. This study was designed to compare predicted position and angulation of maxillary and mandibular incisor by steiner stick analysis with the actual treatment outcome using memotech software.Sample was taken from our department consisting of pre and post treatment lateral cephalogram of 15 subject with age ranging from 20- 22years. Tracing was done using Nemotech software and values for Steiner’s analysis was obtained, both for, pre and post treatment tracing. Prediction was done by Steiner Stick analysis(SSA) on the pre treatment tracing.The position and angulation of Maxillary and Mandibular incisor was compared between prediction based on SSA and post treatment outcome. The parameters taken were U1-NA Linear and U1-NA angular and L1-NB Linear and L1-NB angular and comparison were made using Paired Student T test.: No significant difference was seen in U1-NA distance in (mm) and angulation(degree) Compared between predicted values(U1-NA- 2.478mm, 20.53 degree) and post treatment outcome (U1-NA-2.80mm, 22.733 degree) , p>0.05. Similarly no significant difference was seen in L1-NB distance (mm) compared between predicted (L1-NB 3.1227mm) and post treatment outcome(3.487 mm), p>0.05. However significant difference was seen for L1-NB angulation between predicted (22.573) and actual post treatment outcome(26.02), p<0.05.: Steiner Stick Analysis overestimated the values for angulation for Mandibular Incisors. This could be attributed to variability in mechanics or small size sample. Further studies should aim at comparisons done in larger sample size.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于nemotech软件的斯坦纳头测分析预测和实际治疗结果的比较
社会和心理方面的考虑,改善的功能,外观和自尊鼓励患者追求正畸治疗,拔牙可能需要,也可能不需要。在固定正畸治疗中,通常采用斯坦纳棒分析或粗花呢头板矫正来决定拔除,以获得理想的治疗效果。本研究的目的是比较斯坦纳棒分析预测的上颌和下颌切牙的位置和角度与使用memotech软件的实际治疗结果。样本来自我科,包括治疗前和治疗后的侧位脑电图15例,年龄在20- 22岁之间。使用Nemotech软件进行跟踪,并获得施泰纳分析值,用于治疗前后的跟踪。采用斯坦纳棒分析(SSA)对预处理示踪进行预测。将基于SSA的预测结果与治疗后的结果进行比较。取的参数为U1-NA线性和U1-NA角,L1-NB线性和L1-NB角,采用配对学生T检验进行比较。U1-NA距离(mm)和成角(度)预测值(U1-NA- 2.478mm, 20.53度)与治疗后结果(U1-NA-2.80mm, 22.733度)比较,p>0.05。L1-NB距离(mm)预测值(L1-NB 3.1227mm)与治疗后结果(3.487 mm)比较,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。但治疗后预测结果(22.573)与实际结果(26.02)的L1-NB成角差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。:斯坦纳棒分析法高估了下颌切牙的成角值。这可能归因于力学变化或样本尺寸小。进一步的研究应着眼于在更大的样本量中进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of skeletal Class III malocclusion using two-phase therapy in young patient - A case report CBCT: The third eye in orthodontics Comparison between two types of grids for placement of mini-screw implant in posterior maxillary segment Evaluation of surface-modified orthodontic brackets with silver nanoparticles and its influence on bacterial inhibition – An in vitro study Deep bite -An insight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1