Metaphors and Metaphysics

E. W. Strong
{"title":"Metaphors and Metaphysics","authors":"E. W. Strong","doi":"10.1086/intejethi.47.4.2989370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"5 T WH ETHER in sympathy or antipathy, there are A/1I many philosophers who have been concerned with V Professor Dewey's treatment of metaphysics. For Dewey, the role of philosophy as criticism is a \"straight and narrow path.\" While philosophical discourse partakes of literary discourse, its task is restricted to analysis and evaluation. Not thus restricted are the arts of literary discourse, for, as Dewey writes, \"they have a freer office to perform-to perpetuate, enhance and vivify in imagination the natural goods; .\" The restriction of philosophy to the task of criticism entails the casting-out of cosmological system-making. Metaphysics is concerned solely with a description of the generic traits of existence. A descriptive naturalism notes and registers, detects and defines, the \"inextricable mixture of stability and uncertainty\" displayed by events in their histories. Such a metaphysics is a \"preliminary outline of the field of criticism, whose chief import is to afford understanding of the necessity and nature of the office of intelligence.\" The preliminary outline is no ultimate explanation of anything. No theology or superscience is admitted as a legitimate conversion into a cosmological status of those traits that are precious to us. The ontologically descriptive is not followed by the cosmologically prescriptive. Dewey, in his metaphysics, sets before us the conditions of diversity and mutability which challenge men but offers us no cosmic security, guidance, or solace. Philosophy as criticism looks to the derivations, contexts, and references of our beliefs, meanings, and values and recommends intelligence to provide instruments of choice and control.","PeriodicalId":346392,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Ethics","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1937-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/intejethi.47.4.2989370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

5 T WH ETHER in sympathy or antipathy, there are A/1I many philosophers who have been concerned with V Professor Dewey's treatment of metaphysics. For Dewey, the role of philosophy as criticism is a "straight and narrow path." While philosophical discourse partakes of literary discourse, its task is restricted to analysis and evaluation. Not thus restricted are the arts of literary discourse, for, as Dewey writes, "they have a freer office to perform-to perpetuate, enhance and vivify in imagination the natural goods; ." The restriction of philosophy to the task of criticism entails the casting-out of cosmological system-making. Metaphysics is concerned solely with a description of the generic traits of existence. A descriptive naturalism notes and registers, detects and defines, the "inextricable mixture of stability and uncertainty" displayed by events in their histories. Such a metaphysics is a "preliminary outline of the field of criticism, whose chief import is to afford understanding of the necessity and nature of the office of intelligence." The preliminary outline is no ultimate explanation of anything. No theology or superscience is admitted as a legitimate conversion into a cosmological status of those traits that are precious to us. The ontologically descriptive is not followed by the cosmologically prescriptive. Dewey, in his metaphysics, sets before us the conditions of diversity and mutability which challenge men but offers us no cosmic security, guidance, or solace. Philosophy as criticism looks to the derivations, contexts, and references of our beliefs, meanings, and values and recommends intelligence to provide instruments of choice and control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐喻与形而上学
无论是同情还是反感,有许多哲学家一直关注杜威教授对形而上学的处理。对于杜威来说,哲学作为批判的作用是一条“笔直而狭窄的道路”。哲学话语虽然具有文学话语的部分,但其任务仅限于分析和评价。文学话语的艺术并没有受到这样的限制,因为,正如杜威所写的那样,“它们有更自由的职责去履行——在想象中延续、增强和生动自然之物;把哲学局限于批判的任务,就意味着抛弃了宇宙论的体系建构。形而上学只关心对存在的一般特征的描述。一种描述性的自然主义记录、记录、发现并定义了历史事件所显示的“稳定与不确定性的不可分割的混合”。这样一种形而上学是“批判领域的初步轮廓,其主要意义在于提供对智力职能的必要性和性质的理解”。初步的提纲并不是对任何事情的最终解释。没有神学或超科学被认为是对那些对我们宝贵的特征的合理转换。本体论上的描述并没有遵循宇宙论上的规定。杜威在他的形而上学中,向我们展示了多样性和可变性的条件,这些条件向人类提出了挑战,但却没有给我们提供宇宙的安全、指导或安慰。作为批判的哲学关注我们的信仰、意义和价值观的衍生、背景和参考,并推荐智慧来提供选择和控制的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mastery learning of toxicology life support skills by nurses and doctors, utilizing simulation technology in Nepal Role of Forensic Nurses in the mortuary and postmortem examination An overview of sexual assault cases in Bangladesh Risks, hazards and safety in mortuaries Nut case in ER: ISTOLS Toxidromal Approach by Indian Society of Toxicology in managing botanical emergencies due to Areca Catechu - Betel Nuts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1