Analysis of Studies That Were Carried Out Using Chemistry Textbooks: A Meta-Synthesis Study

Gamze Dolu
{"title":"Analysis of Studies That Were Carried Out Using Chemistry Textbooks: A Meta-Synthesis Study","authors":"Gamze Dolu","doi":"10.19171/uefad.1169708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a meta-synthesis of studies that used chemistry textbooks approved by the Ministry of National Education (MoNE). The study was carried out using the document review method, one of the qualitative methods, and involved 32 articles and 36 theses published between 2001-2020 and selected based on the criteria specified. The data were collected using the \"coding form\", and the frequency values were evaluated in depth and presented in tables and a graph. The study revealed that in Turkey, most of the studies that used chemistry textbooks were in 2010 and 2011 and that the studies mostly used qualitative research methods. It was also found out that the textbooks purpose was mostly \"to examine the characteristics of the textbooks\", and that the units/topics examined in the chemistry textbooks were very diverse. It is thought that the results obtained within the scope of the study will serve as a guide for the researchers who will use chemistry textbooks in their future studies.","PeriodicalId":186052,"journal":{"name":"Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1169708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a meta-synthesis of studies that used chemistry textbooks approved by the Ministry of National Education (MoNE). The study was carried out using the document review method, one of the qualitative methods, and involved 32 articles and 36 theses published between 2001-2020 and selected based on the criteria specified. The data were collected using the "coding form", and the frequency values were evaluated in depth and presented in tables and a graph. The study revealed that in Turkey, most of the studies that used chemistry textbooks were in 2010 and 2011 and that the studies mostly used qualitative research methods. It was also found out that the textbooks purpose was mostly "to examine the characteristics of the textbooks", and that the units/topics examined in the chemistry textbooks were very diverse. It is thought that the results obtained within the scope of the study will serve as a guide for the researchers who will use chemistry textbooks in their future studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用化学教科书进行的研究分析:一项综合研究
这是使用教育部认可的化学教科书进行的综合研究。本研究采用定性方法之一的文献综述法,纳入2001-2020年间发表的32篇文献和36篇论文,并根据指定的标准进行筛选。采用“编码表”收集数据,对频率值进行深度评估,并以表格和图表的形式呈现。该研究显示,在土耳其,大部分使用化学教科书的研究是在2010年和2011年进行的,而且这些研究大多使用定性研究方法。我们还发现,教科书的目的大多是“考察教科书的特点”,化学教科书考察的单元/主题非常多样化。据认为,在研究范围内获得的结果将为今后使用化学教科书进行研究的研究人员提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Yardım Verenlere Yönelik Psikoeğitim Programının Psikolojik Sağlamlık ve İkincil Travmatik Stres Düzeylerine Etkisi Öğretmenlerin Yaşadıkları Gerçeklik Şokunun Neden ve Sonuçlarına İlişkin Fenomenolojik Bir Çalışma Özel Eğitim ve Rehabilitasyon Merkezinde Çalışan Özel Eğitim Alan Mezunu Öğretmenlerinin Pandemi Deneyimleri: Bir Odak Grup Tartışması Hafif Düzeyde Zihin Yetersizliği Olan Öğrenciler Uzaktan Eğitim İçin Ne Diyor? Güzel Sanatlar Liseleri Flüt Ders Kitapları: Öğretmen Bakış Açılarına Dayalı Bir İnceleme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1