US Regulatory Values and Privacy Consequences: Implications for the European Citizen

C. Hoofnagle
{"title":"US Regulatory Values and Privacy Consequences: Implications for the European Citizen","authors":"C. Hoofnagle","doi":"10.21552/EDPL/2016/2/7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Europeans face a regulatory challenge: how can the human rights and dignitary values that animate data protection law be protected in transborder data flows? With the proposal of the EU-US Privacy Shield, part of the challenge will be answered by the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC is a small but powerful US agency established in 1914 to address problems of monopoly and trust. Shortly after its creation, the FTC turned its attention to consumer issues. Over the years, Congress has repeatedly empowered the FTC, and the agency has accomplished much on privacy matters. In a recent book, I recount the FTC’s privacy successes.But this article focuses on the limits of the FTC’s powers. The American business community has eschewed dignity as a privacy value in favor of economistic conceptions of privacy interests. This article explains how the FTC’s focus on economic liberty constrains how it can protect Europeans’ normative interests in privacy. First, this article recounts why the FTC has to find economic pretenses to extend its reach to normative, dignity-based affronts to personality. The article then discusses the structural limits of the FTC and how these limits constrain privacy enforcement. The article concludes with a discussion of instruments that could bridge the gap between the FTC’s economistic conceptions and the values Europeans place in data protection.","PeriodicalId":187253,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Consumer Fraud (Sub-Topic)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Consumer Fraud (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/EDPL/2016/2/7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Europeans face a regulatory challenge: how can the human rights and dignitary values that animate data protection law be protected in transborder data flows? With the proposal of the EU-US Privacy Shield, part of the challenge will be answered by the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC is a small but powerful US agency established in 1914 to address problems of monopoly and trust. Shortly after its creation, the FTC turned its attention to consumer issues. Over the years, Congress has repeatedly empowered the FTC, and the agency has accomplished much on privacy matters. In a recent book, I recount the FTC’s privacy successes.But this article focuses on the limits of the FTC’s powers. The American business community has eschewed dignity as a privacy value in favor of economistic conceptions of privacy interests. This article explains how the FTC’s focus on economic liberty constrains how it can protect Europeans’ normative interests in privacy. First, this article recounts why the FTC has to find economic pretenses to extend its reach to normative, dignity-based affronts to personality. The article then discusses the structural limits of the FTC and how these limits constrain privacy enforcement. The article concludes with a discussion of instruments that could bridge the gap between the FTC’s economistic conceptions and the values Europeans place in data protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国监管价值观和隐私后果:对欧洲公民的启示
欧洲人面临着一项监管挑战:在跨境数据流动中,如何保护推动数据保护法的人权和尊严价值?随着EU-US Privacy Shield的提出,部分挑战将由美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)来应对。美国联邦贸易委员会成立于1914年,是一个规模不大但权力很大的美国机构,旨在解决垄断和信任问题。成立后不久,联邦贸易委员会就把注意力转向了消费者问题。多年来,国会一再授权联邦贸易委员会,该机构在隐私问题上取得了很大成就。在最近的一本书中,我回顾了联邦贸易委员会在保护隐私方面的成功。但本文关注的是联邦贸易委员会权力的限制。美国商业界回避将尊严作为一种隐私价值,转而推崇经济主义的隐私利益概念。本文解释了联邦贸易委员会对经济自由的关注如何限制了它如何保护欧洲人在隐私方面的规范性利益。首先,本文叙述了为什么联邦贸易委员会必须找到经济借口,将其范围扩大到规范的、基于尊严的对人格的侮辱。然后,本文讨论了FTC的结构限制以及这些限制如何约束隐私执行。文章最后讨论了可以弥合联邦贸易委员会的经济概念和欧洲人在数据保护方面的价值观之间差距的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Trade Regime For Digital Assets US Regulatory Values and Privacy Consequences: Implications for the European Citizen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1