{"title":"[Discussion forum medical ethics. B2. Physician's oath: still current? Critical observations on various professional ethical oath texts].","authors":"W U Eckart","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Topicality, expressiveness and universal validity of current ethical vows in medicine are compared critically. Instead of outmoded formula Pellegrino's and Thomasma's suggestion for a new and mainly at patient autonomy-oriented vow is favored.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 2","pages":"3 p. following 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Topicality, expressiveness and universal validity of current ethical vows in medicine are compared critically. Instead of outmoded formula Pellegrino's and Thomasma's suggestion for a new and mainly at patient autonomy-oriented vow is favored.