Understanding Lies Based on Evolutionary Psychology: A Critical Review

Silvio José Lemos Vasconcellos, Matheus Rizzatti, Thamires Pereira Barbosa, Bruna Sangoi Schmitz, Vanessa Cristina Nascimento Coelho, A. Machado
{"title":"Understanding Lies Based on Evolutionary Psychology: A Critical Review","authors":"Silvio José Lemos Vasconcellos, Matheus Rizzatti, Thamires Pereira Barbosa, Bruna Sangoi Schmitz, Vanessa Cristina Nascimento Coelho, A. Machado","doi":"10.9788/TP2019.1-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article aims to propose a theoretical discussion regarding the role of lying based upon the Evolutionary Psychology perspective by shedding a new light on the main studies conducted in this area. In order to do so, this article addresses the phylogenies and ontogenies of the capability to lie, both suggesting that the rise of lying as a pro-social deed is intimately related with Homo sapiens incredibly broad and complex communication skills. Like so, the paper continues on expatiating on the underlying cognitive and neuronal mechanisms of lying and lying recognition, as well as the diff erences amongst genders concerning the ability to recognize deceit. Broadly, the present theoretic study may elucidate the current state of knowledge regarding the topic, thus signaling necessary and more promising paths for future studies to follow with the purpose of contributing to fi elds where the act of uttering lies is highly present, such as the judicial context.","PeriodicalId":142063,"journal":{"name":"Temas em Psicologia","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temas em Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.1-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The present article aims to propose a theoretical discussion regarding the role of lying based upon the Evolutionary Psychology perspective by shedding a new light on the main studies conducted in this area. In order to do so, this article addresses the phylogenies and ontogenies of the capability to lie, both suggesting that the rise of lying as a pro-social deed is intimately related with Homo sapiens incredibly broad and complex communication skills. Like so, the paper continues on expatiating on the underlying cognitive and neuronal mechanisms of lying and lying recognition, as well as the diff erences amongst genders concerning the ability to recognize deceit. Broadly, the present theoretic study may elucidate the current state of knowledge regarding the topic, thus signaling necessary and more promising paths for future studies to follow with the purpose of contributing to fi elds where the act of uttering lies is highly present, such as the judicial context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于进化心理学的谎言理解:批判性评论
本文旨在从进化心理学的角度,通过对这一领域的主要研究进行新的梳理,提出一个关于说谎作用的理论讨论。为了做到这一点,本文阐述了说谎能力的系统发生和个体发生,两者都表明,说谎作为一种亲社会行为的兴起与智人极其广泛和复杂的沟通技巧密切相关。因此,本文继续阐述谎言和谎言识别的潜在认知和神经机制,以及性别在识别欺骗能力方面的差异。从广义上讲,目前的理论研究可以阐明关于该主题的当前知识状况,从而为未来的研究指明了必要和更有前途的道路,目的是为说出谎言的行为高度存在的领域做出贡献,例如司法语境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health Professionals Men tal Health A oo at their Su erin Peers as Agents of Dating Violence Prevention: Feasibility Analysis of an Intervention Community Resilience: A Case Study of a Community of Fortaleza, CE Representational Structure of Vitiligo: Non-Restrictive Skin Marks Cannabis Legalization: Perceptions of Psychiatrists and Recovering Users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1