An audit of unnecessary preoperative urea and electrolyte panel tests in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery at a quaternary South African hospital

Y. Moodley, SS Mashele
{"title":"An audit of unnecessary preoperative urea and electrolyte panel tests in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery at a quaternary South African hospital","authors":"Y. Moodley, SS Mashele","doi":"10.36303/jmlstsa.2021.3.1.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Preoperative urea and electrolyte (U&E) panels are frequently requested for major surgery patients at risk for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). There is only one published study that has audited unnecessary preoperative U&E test panel utilisation in major surgery patients at a South African (SA) public sector hospital. This has significant implications for laboratory workloads, healthcare expenditure, and patient-friendly practice in the resource-limited SA public healthcare sector.\n\nObjective: To audit preoperative U&E panel requests in a sample of SA patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery.\n\nMethods: We conducted a retrospective audit of adult primary hip arthroplasty patients who attended a quaternary SA hospital. Data on demographics, medical history, preoperative anaesthetic evaluations, operation details, and U&E panel requests were collected from each patient’s medical chart. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, based on American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading and the presence of AKI risk factors, was used to distinguish between necessary and unnecessary preoperative U&E requests. We used descriptive statistics to analyse our study data.\n\nResults: Of the 175 patients comprising our study sample, 23 (13.1%) had preoperative U&E panels requested unnecessarily. All 23 patients were otherwise healthy and did not have any AKI risk factors.\n\nConclusion: A small proportion of preoperative U&E test panels in our study sample of major orthopaedic surgery patients were deemed unnecessary. With that being said, there is still room for improvement in practices around preoperative U&E panel requests, which could be achieved through educational, computerised, and audit feedback interventions.","PeriodicalId":332687,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Laboratory Science & Technology of South Africa","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Laboratory Science & Technology of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36303/jmlstsa.2021.3.1.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preoperative urea and electrolyte (U&E) panels are frequently requested for major surgery patients at risk for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). There is only one published study that has audited unnecessary preoperative U&E test panel utilisation in major surgery patients at a South African (SA) public sector hospital. This has significant implications for laboratory workloads, healthcare expenditure, and patient-friendly practice in the resource-limited SA public healthcare sector. Objective: To audit preoperative U&E panel requests in a sample of SA patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective audit of adult primary hip arthroplasty patients who attended a quaternary SA hospital. Data on demographics, medical history, preoperative anaesthetic evaluations, operation details, and U&E panel requests were collected from each patient’s medical chart. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, based on American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading and the presence of AKI risk factors, was used to distinguish between necessary and unnecessary preoperative U&E requests. We used descriptive statistics to analyse our study data. Results: Of the 175 patients comprising our study sample, 23 (13.1%) had preoperative U&E panels requested unnecessarily. All 23 patients were otherwise healthy and did not have any AKI risk factors. Conclusion: A small proportion of preoperative U&E test panels in our study sample of major orthopaedic surgery patients were deemed unnecessary. With that being said, there is still room for improvement in practices around preoperative U&E panel requests, which could be achieved through educational, computerised, and audit feedback interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非一家第四医院对接受大型骨科手术的患者进行不必要的术前尿素和电解质检查的审计
背景:术前尿素和电解质(U&E)检查经常被要求用于有术后急性肾损伤(AKI)风险的大手术患者。只有一项已发表的研究审计了南非(SA)公立医院大手术患者术前不必要的U&E检测面板的使用。这对资源有限的南非公共医疗保健部门的实验室工作量、医疗保健支出和患者友好型实践具有重大影响。目的:审核一组接受骨科大手术的SA患者术前U&E小组的要求。方法:我们对一家第四SA医院的成人原发性髋关节置换术患者进行了回顾性审计。从每位患者的病历中收集人口统计、病史、术前麻醉评估、手术细节和U&E小组请求等数据。根据美国麻醉师协会(ASA)分级和AKI危险因素的存在,国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)指南被用于区分必要和不必要的术前U&E请求。我们使用描述性统计来分析我们的研究数据。结果:在我们的研究样本中的175例患者中,23例(13.1%)进行了不必要的术前U&E检查。所有23例患者在其他方面都很健康,没有任何AKI危险因素。结论:在我们研究的骨科大手术患者样本中,有一小部分术前U&E检查板被认为是不必要的。综上所述,术前U&E专家组请求的实践仍有改进的空间,这可以通过教育、计算机化和审计反馈干预来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Game of clones: A case of ELANE gene mutation-related neutrope An overview of medical diagnostic laboratories in South Africa that meet the international standard of accreditation: ISO 15189 Establishment of reference intervals of biochemical analytes for South African adults: a study conducted as part of the IFCC global multicentre study on reference values Comparison of endocervical swabs to cultured isolates for the detection of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Neisseria gonorrhoeae An audit of unnecessary preoperative urea and electrolyte panel tests in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery at a quaternary South African hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1