A method to rebuild vegetation formations to determinate environmental damage

J. J. Sáez
{"title":"A method to rebuild vegetation formations to determinate environmental damage","authors":"J. J. Sáez","doi":"10.15406/frcij.2018.06.00202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cutting of vegetation has been considered one of the greatest impacts that the human being has made on the ecosystem.1 The change of the land use (harvesting, deforestation, and conversion of grasslands and wetlands), has been reduced the stock of global terrestrial plant in 45% in the last 200 years, with a third of these being achieved in the twentieth century.2 The flora and vegetation are a fundamental pillar for the concept of ecosystem service, they purify the air and water, generate oxygen, stabilizes the soil and serves as habitat for the animals.3 Considering the importance of this ecosystem several countries consider the cutting of vegetation and plants as illegal.4–7 An example is what happens in Chile, where the cut of native vegetation might be considered as an environmental damage. In Chile the environmental damage is regulated by the law No. 19,300 (General Bases of Environment), where it is designated that all the negligent or that willfully cause damage to the environment, will be obliged to repair it materially, at their cost, if this possible, and compensate it in accordance with the law.8,9 Environmental damage involves the obvious transgression to the constitutional right to live in an environment without pollution.8 In this way, the 19,300 law defines environmental damage for all legal purposes as “any loss, decrease, detriment or significant impairment inferred to the environment or to one or more of its components (article 2 letter e)”. Within the environmental damage there is the destruction of native vegetation.","PeriodicalId":284029,"journal":{"name":"Foresic Research & Criminology International Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foresic Research & Criminology International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/frcij.2018.06.00202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cutting of vegetation has been considered one of the greatest impacts that the human being has made on the ecosystem.1 The change of the land use (harvesting, deforestation, and conversion of grasslands and wetlands), has been reduced the stock of global terrestrial plant in 45% in the last 200 years, with a third of these being achieved in the twentieth century.2 The flora and vegetation are a fundamental pillar for the concept of ecosystem service, they purify the air and water, generate oxygen, stabilizes the soil and serves as habitat for the animals.3 Considering the importance of this ecosystem several countries consider the cutting of vegetation and plants as illegal.4–7 An example is what happens in Chile, where the cut of native vegetation might be considered as an environmental damage. In Chile the environmental damage is regulated by the law No. 19,300 (General Bases of Environment), where it is designated that all the negligent or that willfully cause damage to the environment, will be obliged to repair it materially, at their cost, if this possible, and compensate it in accordance with the law.8,9 Environmental damage involves the obvious transgression to the constitutional right to live in an environment without pollution.8 In this way, the 19,300 law defines environmental damage for all legal purposes as “any loss, decrease, detriment or significant impairment inferred to the environment or to one or more of its components (article 2 letter e)”. Within the environmental damage there is the destruction of native vegetation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种重建植被形成以确定环境损害的方法
砍伐植被被认为是人类对生态系统造成的最大影响之一土地利用的变化(采伐、森林砍伐、草地和湿地的转换)在过去200年中使全球陆生植物的存量减少了45%,其中三分之一是在20世纪实现的植物群和植被是生态系统服务概念的基本支柱,它们净化空气和水,产生氧气,稳定土壤,并为动物提供栖息地考虑到这一生态系统的重要性,一些国家认为砍伐植被和植物是非法的。一个例子是在智利发生的事情,在那里,对当地植被的砍伐可能被视为一种环境破坏。在智利,第19,300号法律(环境基本法)规定了环境损害,其中规定,所有疏忽或故意造成环境损害的人都有义务在可能的情况下自费进行实质性修复,并根据法律予以赔偿。环境损害是对宪法赋予的在无污染环境中生活的权利的明显侵犯这样,1993年法律为所有法律目的将环境损害定义为“推断对环境或其一个或多个组成部分的任何损失、减少、损害或重大损害(第2条e项)”。在环境破坏中有原生植被的破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining the liability issues associated with prone restraint deaths in detention Transformation of labour rights: a solution to protecting prisoners in China? Forensic evidence – a rape and murder case Overview on crime scene procedures involving animals The right of peoples to self-determination and territorial integrity of states in the estimates and conclusions of the Venice commission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1