Future Directions and Implementation Strategies for Concrete Pavement Design and Construction

M. Snyder, T. V. Van Dam, Prashant V. Ram, Kurt Smith, H. Yu
{"title":"Future Directions and Implementation Strategies for Concrete Pavement Design and Construction","authors":"M. Snyder, T. V. Van Dam, Prashant V. Ram, Kurt Smith, H. Yu","doi":"10.33593/m369lz1c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) hosted a ``Concrete Pavement Strategic Planning Meeting'' in August 2019 for the purposes of 1) identifying future needs and directions in concrete pavement design, and 2) the development of strategies to increase the implementation of long-life concrete pavement (LLCP) design and construction. The meeting was attended by an Expert Task Group (ETG) of knowledgeable concrete pavement experts and practitioners representing highway agencies, academia, industry partners and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Many of the strengths and limitations of current concrete pavement design procedures were identified and discussed. It was recognized that AASHTOWare PavementME Design and other similarly sophisticated procedures represent a significant technological leap over empirical design procedures with which they compete (and often replace). However, there are concerns about performance model limitations, the cost-effectiveness of local calibration efforts, the emphasis on surface thickness design (often assuming, rather than designing, support conditions), and other issues. The potential service and economic benefits of LLCP were also discussed. The impetus for implementation (and benefits documented) by some agencies were described, as were the impediments to implementation for other agencies. Strategies were developed to help overcome the impediments identified and to facilitate broader use of LLCP. This paper summarizes key points raised on each of these issues and includes recommendations for future directions in concrete pavement design and increased implementation of LLCP.","PeriodicalId":265129,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concrete Pavements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concrete Pavements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33593/m369lz1c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) hosted a ``Concrete Pavement Strategic Planning Meeting'' in August 2019 for the purposes of 1) identifying future needs and directions in concrete pavement design, and 2) the development of strategies to increase the implementation of long-life concrete pavement (LLCP) design and construction. The meeting was attended by an Expert Task Group (ETG) of knowledgeable concrete pavement experts and practitioners representing highway agencies, academia, industry partners and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Many of the strengths and limitations of current concrete pavement design procedures were identified and discussed. It was recognized that AASHTOWare PavementME Design and other similarly sophisticated procedures represent a significant technological leap over empirical design procedures with which they compete (and often replace). However, there are concerns about performance model limitations, the cost-effectiveness of local calibration efforts, the emphasis on surface thickness design (often assuming, rather than designing, support conditions), and other issues. The potential service and economic benefits of LLCP were also discussed. The impetus for implementation (and benefits documented) by some agencies were described, as were the impediments to implementation for other agencies. Strategies were developed to help overcome the impediments identified and to facilitate broader use of LLCP. This paper summarizes key points raised on each of these issues and includes recommendations for future directions in concrete pavement design and increased implementation of LLCP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混凝土路面设计与施工的未来方向与实施策略
美国联邦公路管理局(FHWA)于2019年8月举办了“混凝土路面战略规划会议”,目的是1)确定混凝土路面设计的未来需求和方向,以及2)制定战略,以增加长寿命混凝土路面(LLCP)设计和施工的实施。专家工作组(ETG)由知识渊博的混凝土路面专家和从业人员组成,代表了公路机构、学术界、行业合作伙伴和联邦公路管理局(FHWA)。许多目前的混凝土路面设计程序的优势和局限性进行了识别和讨论。人们认识到,AASHTOWare PavementME设计和其他类似的复杂程序代表了一个重大的技术飞跃,超越了它们与经验设计程序的竞争(并经常取代)。然而,存在性能模型限制、局部校准工作的成本效益、强调表面厚度设计(通常假设而不是设计支持条件)和其他问题。讨论了LLCP的潜在服务和经济效益。介绍了一些机构执行的动力(和记录的利益),以及其他机构执行的障碍。制定了有助于克服已确定的障碍并促进LLCP更广泛使用的战略。本文总结了这些问题的关键点,并对混凝土路面设计的未来方向和增加LLCP的实施提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity Analysis of FAARFIELD Rigid Airport Pavement Thickness Determination Guidance for Increasing the Use of Recycled Concrete Pavement Materials Performance Summary Of Precast Concrete Inlay Panel Trial In Ontario Validation Of A New Method For Determining The Remaining Service Life Of Rigid Pavements Impacts Of Flooding On Concrete Pavement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1