{"title":"Assessment of Drug Prescriptions at the University Hospital Center, National Center of Odontostomatology (CHU-CNOS) in Bamako, Mali","authors":"Sanou Coulibaly Kho","doi":"10.23880/apct-16000186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The prescription is an order for delivery and an act by which the practitioner draws up a list of products or hygienic-dietetic measures. Methodology: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study to assess the quality of prescriptions. It took place at the University Hospital for Odontostomatology over a period of six months, during which 870 medical prescriptions were included. Result: The most important information to figured out orders such as the prescription date, the qualification of the prescriber, the signature and stamp were not mentioned, respectively, in 3; 81; 5 and 7% of cases. Almost no prescription prescribed referred to weights (99% of cases). The duration of treatment is not specified in 99% of cases. The full name of the patient and readability of orders were still noted in all cases. Discussion/Conclusion: For a prescription, certain legal references can incriminate prescribers and lead patients into therapeutic errors","PeriodicalId":313915,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacology & Clinical Trials","volume":"208 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Pharmacology & Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/apct-16000186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The prescription is an order for delivery and an act by which the practitioner draws up a list of products or hygienic-dietetic measures. Methodology: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study to assess the quality of prescriptions. It took place at the University Hospital for Odontostomatology over a period of six months, during which 870 medical prescriptions were included. Result: The most important information to figured out orders such as the prescription date, the qualification of the prescriber, the signature and stamp were not mentioned, respectively, in 3; 81; 5 and 7% of cases. Almost no prescription prescribed referred to weights (99% of cases). The duration of treatment is not specified in 99% of cases. The full name of the patient and readability of orders were still noted in all cases. Discussion/Conclusion: For a prescription, certain legal references can incriminate prescribers and lead patients into therapeutic errors