Restructuring the Eligibility Policies of the Child Care and Development Fund to Address Benefits Cliffs and Affordability

B. Birken, E. Ilin, Alexander I. Ruder, Ellyn Terry
{"title":"Restructuring the Eligibility Policies of the Child Care and Development Fund to Address Benefits Cliffs and Affordability","authors":"B. Birken, E. Ilin, Alexander I. Ruder, Ellyn Terry","doi":"10.29338/dp2021-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores how the current eligibility policies of the federal Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) create benefits cliffs that act as barriers to economic self-sufficiency. By examining Florida data and policies, the authors demonstrate how the program’s existing co-payment schedule affects the same hypothetical family living in two contrasting Florida counties: one with state median living costs and one with high living costs. The authors find that the CCDF income eligibility exit threshold is too low, particularly in high-cost counties. That occurs because the exit threshold is based on the state median income, as opposed to more local measures that better approximate and reflect local cost of living. The authors propose and calculate the additional family and government costs of two alternative CCDF phase-out designs, which would remove the CCDF benefits cliffs. Both proposed alternatives feature smooth phase-out schedules that align the subsidies with the local cost of childcare, thereby reducing barriers to economic mobility unintentionally created by government policies.","PeriodicalId":218099,"journal":{"name":"Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Community and Economic Development Discussion Papers","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Community and Economic Development Discussion Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29338/dp2021-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores how the current eligibility policies of the federal Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) create benefits cliffs that act as barriers to economic self-sufficiency. By examining Florida data and policies, the authors demonstrate how the program’s existing co-payment schedule affects the same hypothetical family living in two contrasting Florida counties: one with state median living costs and one with high living costs. The authors find that the CCDF income eligibility exit threshold is too low, particularly in high-cost counties. That occurs because the exit threshold is based on the state median income, as opposed to more local measures that better approximate and reflect local cost of living. The authors propose and calculate the additional family and government costs of two alternative CCDF phase-out designs, which would remove the CCDF benefits cliffs. Both proposed alternatives feature smooth phase-out schedules that align the subsidies with the local cost of childcare, thereby reducing barriers to economic mobility unintentionally created by government policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重组儿童保育和发展基金的资格政策,以解决福利悬崖和负担能力问题
本文探讨了目前联邦儿童保育和发展基金(CCDF)的资格政策是如何造成经济自给自足障碍的福利悬崖的。通过检查佛罗里达州的数据和政策,作者展示了该计划现有的共同支付计划如何影响生活在佛罗里达州两个截然不同的县的同一个假设家庭:一个是州生活成本中位数,另一个是高生活成本。作者发现,CCDF收入资格退出门槛太低,特别是在高成本县。之所以会出现这种情况,是因为退出门槛是基于州收入中位数,而不是基于更接近和反映当地生活成本的更本地化的衡量标准。作者提出并计算了两种替代CCDF逐步淘汰设计的额外家庭和政府成本,这将消除CCDF的利益悬崖。这两种替代方案都有一个平稳的逐步淘汰时间表,使补贴与当地的儿童保育成本保持一致,从而减少政府政策无意中造成的经济流动障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Restructuring the Eligibility Policies of the Child Care and Development Fund to Address Benefits Cliffs and Affordability Anchor Institution Strategies in the Southeast: Working with Hospitals and Universities to Support Inclusive Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1