Introduction: Metaphors as Meaning and Method in Technoculture

T. Cowan, Jasmine Rault
{"title":"Introduction: Metaphors as Meaning and Method in Technoculture","authors":"T. Cowan, Jasmine Rault","doi":"10.28968/cftt.v8i2.39036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metaphors are critical sites of analysis for feminist scholars of science and technology because of what they both conceal and divulge about the conditions of their historical emergence and the persistence of those conditions. As researchers and editors, we find ourselves oriented to work that takes up the task of contesting uncontested metaphors, considering how metaphor “invades” (Tuck & Yang 2012, 3) and evacuates meaning. This Special Section carries on the dynamic practice in feminist STS of taking the work, and ambivalent potentiality, of metaphor seriously. In this Introduction, we draw together scholarship that informs what we identify as the \"metaphor-work\" of feminist STS—the work of allegory, myth, metaphor, figurative and associative discourse, and their analysis—as central to the methods by which we make and remake meanings that matter to feminist technocultures. Throughout the metaphor-work collected here, the contributors propose that paradigm change comes through the collective refusal of some metaphors, through the re-evaluation of others, and the introduction of new metaphorical frames and figures to reorient our work.\n ","PeriodicalId":316008,"journal":{"name":"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience","volume":"563 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v8i2.39036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metaphors are critical sites of analysis for feminist scholars of science and technology because of what they both conceal and divulge about the conditions of their historical emergence and the persistence of those conditions. As researchers and editors, we find ourselves oriented to work that takes up the task of contesting uncontested metaphors, considering how metaphor “invades” (Tuck & Yang 2012, 3) and evacuates meaning. This Special Section carries on the dynamic practice in feminist STS of taking the work, and ambivalent potentiality, of metaphor seriously. In this Introduction, we draw together scholarship that informs what we identify as the "metaphor-work" of feminist STS—the work of allegory, myth, metaphor, figurative and associative discourse, and their analysis—as central to the methods by which we make and remake meanings that matter to feminist technocultures. Throughout the metaphor-work collected here, the contributors propose that paradigm change comes through the collective refusal of some metaphors, through the re-evaluation of others, and the introduction of new metaphorical frames and figures to reorient our work.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导论:隐喻在技术文化中的意义和方法
隐喻是研究科学和技术的女性主义学者分析的重要场所,因为它们既隐藏又揭示了它们历史出现的条件以及这些条件的持续存在。作为研究人员和编辑,我们发现自己倾向于承担挑战无争议隐喻的任务,考虑隐喻如何“入侵”(Tuck & Yang 2012, 3)和疏散意义。本专题对女性主义STS中重视隐喻的工作及其矛盾潜能进行了动态实践。在这篇导论中,我们汇集了一些学者,这些学者告诉我们,我们认为女权主义sts的“隐喻工作”——寓言、神话、隐喻、比喻和联想话语的工作,以及它们的分析——是我们创造和重塑对女权主义技术文化重要的意义的方法的核心。在这里收集的隐喻作品中,作者提出范式的变化来自于对某些隐喻的集体拒绝,通过对其他隐喻的重新评估,以及引入新的隐喻框架和人物来重新定位我们的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Inheritance of Militarization: Toxic Gifts, Furtive Critique, and Survivance in Post-War Bosnia Book Review | Weighing the Future: Race, Science, and Pregnancy Trials in the Postgenomic Era by Natali Valdez (University of California Press, 2022) Data Surrogates as Hosts: Politics of Environmental Governance Moral Economies of Life and Death: Agricultural Improvement, Imperialism, and Chemical Kinships with Reactive Nitrogen Homing Toxicity: The Domestication of Herbicidal Warfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1