{"title":"Introduction: Metaphors as Meaning and Method in Technoculture","authors":"T. Cowan, Jasmine Rault","doi":"10.28968/cftt.v8i2.39036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metaphors are critical sites of analysis for feminist scholars of science and technology because of what they both conceal and divulge about the conditions of their historical emergence and the persistence of those conditions. As researchers and editors, we find ourselves oriented to work that takes up the task of contesting uncontested metaphors, considering how metaphor “invades” (Tuck & Yang 2012, 3) and evacuates meaning. This Special Section carries on the dynamic practice in feminist STS of taking the work, and ambivalent potentiality, of metaphor seriously. In this Introduction, we draw together scholarship that informs what we identify as the \"metaphor-work\" of feminist STS—the work of allegory, myth, metaphor, figurative and associative discourse, and their analysis—as central to the methods by which we make and remake meanings that matter to feminist technocultures. Throughout the metaphor-work collected here, the contributors propose that paradigm change comes through the collective refusal of some metaphors, through the re-evaluation of others, and the introduction of new metaphorical frames and figures to reorient our work.\n ","PeriodicalId":316008,"journal":{"name":"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience","volume":"563 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v8i2.39036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Metaphors are critical sites of analysis for feminist scholars of science and technology because of what they both conceal and divulge about the conditions of their historical emergence and the persistence of those conditions. As researchers and editors, we find ourselves oriented to work that takes up the task of contesting uncontested metaphors, considering how metaphor “invades” (Tuck & Yang 2012, 3) and evacuates meaning. This Special Section carries on the dynamic practice in feminist STS of taking the work, and ambivalent potentiality, of metaphor seriously. In this Introduction, we draw together scholarship that informs what we identify as the "metaphor-work" of feminist STS—the work of allegory, myth, metaphor, figurative and associative discourse, and their analysis—as central to the methods by which we make and remake meanings that matter to feminist technocultures. Throughout the metaphor-work collected here, the contributors propose that paradigm change comes through the collective refusal of some metaphors, through the re-evaluation of others, and the introduction of new metaphorical frames and figures to reorient our work.
隐喻是研究科学和技术的女性主义学者分析的重要场所,因为它们既隐藏又揭示了它们历史出现的条件以及这些条件的持续存在。作为研究人员和编辑,我们发现自己倾向于承担挑战无争议隐喻的任务,考虑隐喻如何“入侵”(Tuck & Yang 2012, 3)和疏散意义。本专题对女性主义STS中重视隐喻的工作及其矛盾潜能进行了动态实践。在这篇导论中,我们汇集了一些学者,这些学者告诉我们,我们认为女权主义sts的“隐喻工作”——寓言、神话、隐喻、比喻和联想话语的工作,以及它们的分析——是我们创造和重塑对女权主义技术文化重要的意义的方法的核心。在这里收集的隐喻作品中,作者提出范式的变化来自于对某些隐喻的集体拒绝,通过对其他隐喻的重新评估,以及引入新的隐喻框架和人物来重新定位我们的工作。