Ontological causality as the demarcation criterion of scientific & philosophical fields: things and objects vs. criteria vs. processes

K. Papageorgiou, Demetrios E. Lekkas
{"title":"Ontological causality as the demarcation criterion of scientific & philosophical fields: things and objects vs. criteria vs. processes","authors":"K. Papageorgiou, Demetrios E. Lekkas","doi":"10.12681/eml.31033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper follows an interdisciplinary approach through at least three disciplines, i.e. logic, ontology and sociology (of expertise). Its aim is to provide a useful tool for the fields related to the study of expertise to demarcate the various scientific fields. In the process several issues are also addressed; issues such as causation and negation that are equally important for this discussion but current literature does not and maybe cannot cover.","PeriodicalId":127692,"journal":{"name":"Epistēmēs Metron Logos","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epistēmēs Metron Logos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/eml.31033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper follows an interdisciplinary approach through at least three disciplines, i.e. logic, ontology and sociology (of expertise). Its aim is to provide a useful tool for the fields related to the study of expertise to demarcate the various scientific fields. In the process several issues are also addressed; issues such as causation and negation that are equally important for this discussion but current literature does not and maybe cannot cover.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本体论的因果关系作为科学和哲学领域的划分标准:事物和对象vs标准vs过程
本文遵循跨学科的方法,通过至少三个学科,即逻辑学,本体论和社会学(专业知识)。它的目的是为与专业知识研究相关的领域提供一个有用的工具来划分不同的科学领域。在此过程中,还讨论了几个问题;诸如因果关系和否定的问题,对这个讨论同样重要,但目前的文献没有,也可能无法涵盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editors with multiple retractions, but who serve on journal editorial boards: Case studies Gestational Surrogate’s Autonomy Towards a surveillant reality in tennis When academic papers’ stated emails do not match authors’ affiliations: A new budding crisis in paper mill-ridden academic publishing? Ontological causality as the demarcation criterion of scientific & philosophical fields: things and objects vs. criteria vs. processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1