Introducing Life Cycle Cost Analysis in an Undergraduate Gas Turbine Engine Design Capstone Course

A. Byerley, S. Brandt
{"title":"Introducing Life Cycle Cost Analysis in an Undergraduate Gas Turbine Engine Design Capstone Course","authors":"A. Byerley, S. Brandt","doi":"10.1115/GT2020-15718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The purpose of this paper is to introduce the basics of life cycle cost analysis for use in an undergraduate, senior-level capstone, gas turbine engine design course. This paper will support the heightened interest within the military acquisition community that now requires life cycle cost analysis to be included in the proposals submitted by defense contractors. The capstone design course includes both the gas turbine engine cycle selection and engine component design that supports a particular aircraft application. While the students have been taught how to estimate the fuel costs, engine development costs, and the time-varying production costs of engines, they have not yet been provided instruction on how to factor all three types of costs into an engineering economics, time-value-of-money, present value analysis. This paper will fill that gap and serve as a resource for the students who must now consider life cycle cost as an element in their design decision matrix along with engine performance, technical risk, and development time. The typical case compares an engine where the upfront development and production costs associated with a more advanced level of technology are high early on in the life cycle but over time has a lower fuel cost compared to an engine with a lower development and production cost but with a higher fuel cost. This paper illustrates how the aerodynamics, thermodynamics, and engineering economics can be brought together to inform and defend a decision about which of the two (or more) alternatives is best. The engineering economic analysis is spreadsheet based and uses inflation adjusted, total annual costs to calculate the present value for use in a decision matrix.","PeriodicalId":436120,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6: Education; Electric Power","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6: Education; Electric Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2020-15718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to introduce the basics of life cycle cost analysis for use in an undergraduate, senior-level capstone, gas turbine engine design course. This paper will support the heightened interest within the military acquisition community that now requires life cycle cost analysis to be included in the proposals submitted by defense contractors. The capstone design course includes both the gas turbine engine cycle selection and engine component design that supports a particular aircraft application. While the students have been taught how to estimate the fuel costs, engine development costs, and the time-varying production costs of engines, they have not yet been provided instruction on how to factor all three types of costs into an engineering economics, time-value-of-money, present value analysis. This paper will fill that gap and serve as a resource for the students who must now consider life cycle cost as an element in their design decision matrix along with engine performance, technical risk, and development time. The typical case compares an engine where the upfront development and production costs associated with a more advanced level of technology are high early on in the life cycle but over time has a lower fuel cost compared to an engine with a lower development and production cost but with a higher fuel cost. This paper illustrates how the aerodynamics, thermodynamics, and engineering economics can be brought together to inform and defend a decision about which of the two (or more) alternatives is best. The engineering economic analysis is spreadsheet based and uses inflation adjusted, total annual costs to calculate the present value for use in a decision matrix.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在本科燃气轮机设计顶点课程中引入生命周期成本分析
本文的目的是介绍生命周期成本分析的基础知识,用于本科,高级顶点,燃气轮机设计课程。这篇论文将支持军事采采界对生命周期成本分析的高度关注,该分析现在需要包括在国防承包商提交的提案中。顶点设计课程包括燃气涡轮发动机循环选择和支持特定飞机应用的发动机部件设计。虽然学生们已经被教导如何估计燃料成本、发动机开发成本和发动机随时间变化的生产成本,但他们还没有被教导如何将这三种类型的成本纳入工程经济学、时间价值和现值分析。本文将填补这一空白,并为那些现在必须将生命周期成本与发动机性能、技术风险和开发时间一起考虑在设计决策矩阵中的学生提供资源。典型的例子是,与开发和生产成本较低但燃料成本较高的发动机相比,与先进技术相关的前期开发和生产成本较高的发动机,随着时间的推移,其燃料成本较低。本文阐述了如何将空气动力学、热力学和工程经济学结合起来,为两种(或更多)替代方案中哪一种是最好的决策提供信息和辩护。工程经济分析是基于电子表格的,并使用通货膨胀调整后的年度总成本来计算用于决策矩阵的现值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prediction of Gas Turbine Performance Using Machine Learning Methods Development of Web-Based Short Courses on Control, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation How Is a Correct GT Combustor Heat Balance Established? A Toolbox of Hardware and Digital Solutions for Increased Flexibility Interactive Learning Platform for Turbine Design Using Reduced Order Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1