Alfredo Perez, Elizabeth E. Grandón, Mónica Caniupán, Gilda Vargas
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Prediction Techniques to Determine Student Dropout: Logistic Regression vs Decision Trees","authors":"Alfredo Perez, Elizabeth E. Grandón, Mónica Caniupán, Gilda Vargas","doi":"10.1109/SCCC.2018.8705262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the detection of students who may drop out from an academic program is a relevant issue for universities, so there are efforts to examine the variables that determine students' drop out. Drop out is defined in different ways, however, all the studies converge in that for a student to drop out a course of study, some variables must be combined. This study presents a comparison of performance indicators of the current drop out model of the Universidad del Bío-Bío (UBB), which is based on logistic regression technique and it is compared with a new model based on decision trees. The new model is obtained through data mining methodologies and it was implemented through the SAP Predictive Analytics tool. To train, validate, and apply the model, real data from the UBB databases were used. The comparison shows that the prediction of student´ drop out of the proposed model obtains an accuracy of 86%, a precision of 97% with an error rate of 14%, better indicators than the current values delivered by the model based on logistic regression. Subsequently, the prediction model obtained was optimized considering other variables, improving even more the prediction indicators. Higher education institutions should take into account the variables that explain the most the phenomenon of student´s drop out to improve the retention of their students.","PeriodicalId":235495,"journal":{"name":"2018 37th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 37th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCCC.2018.8705262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Currently, the detection of students who may drop out from an academic program is a relevant issue for universities, so there are efforts to examine the variables that determine students' drop out. Drop out is defined in different ways, however, all the studies converge in that for a student to drop out a course of study, some variables must be combined. This study presents a comparison of performance indicators of the current drop out model of the Universidad del Bío-Bío (UBB), which is based on logistic regression technique and it is compared with a new model based on decision trees. The new model is obtained through data mining methodologies and it was implemented through the SAP Predictive Analytics tool. To train, validate, and apply the model, real data from the UBB databases were used. The comparison shows that the prediction of student´ drop out of the proposed model obtains an accuracy of 86%, a precision of 97% with an error rate of 14%, better indicators than the current values delivered by the model based on logistic regression. Subsequently, the prediction model obtained was optimized considering other variables, improving even more the prediction indicators. Higher education institutions should take into account the variables that explain the most the phenomenon of student´s drop out to improve the retention of their students.
目前,对于大学来说,检测可能从学术课程退学的学生是一个相关问题,因此有人努力检查决定学生退学的变量。辍学有不同的定义,然而,所有的研究都一致认为,一个学生要想退出一门课程,必须结合一些变量。本文对目前基于逻辑回归技术的universsidad del Bío-Bío (UBB)退学模型的绩效指标进行了比较,并与基于决策树的新模型进行了比较。该模型通过数据挖掘方法得到,并通过SAP预测分析工具实现。为了训练、验证和应用模型,使用了来自UBB数据库的真实数据。对比表明,该模型预测学生辍学的准确率为86%,精密度为97%,错误率为14%,优于目前基于逻辑回归的模型所提供的指标。随后,考虑其他变量对得到的预测模型进行优化,进一步提高了预测指标。高等教育机构应该考虑到最能解释学生辍学现象的变量,以提高学生的保留率。