A componential analysis of leadership using the social relations model

D. Kenny, S. Livi
{"title":"A componential analysis of leadership using the social relations model","authors":"D. Kenny, S. Livi","doi":"10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The social relations model (SRM; Kenny, 1994) explicitly proposes that leadership simultaneously operates at three levels of analysis: group, dyad, and individual (perceiver and target). With this model, researchers can empirically determine the amount of variance at each level as well as those factors that explain variance at these different levels. This chapter shows how the SRM can be used to address many theoretically important questions in the study of leadership and can be used to advance both the theory of and research in leadership. First, based on analysis of leadership ratings from seven studies, we find that there is substantial agreement (i.e., target variance) about who in the group is the leader and little or no reciprocity in the perceptions of leadership. We then consider correlations of leadership perceptions. In one analysis, we examine the correlations between task-oriented and socioemotional leadership. In another analysis, we examine the effect of gender and gender composition on the perception of leadership. We also explore how self-ratings of leadership differ from member perceptions of leadership. Finally, we discuss how the model can be estimated using conventional software.","PeriodicalId":277029,"journal":{"name":"Research in Multi Level Issues","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Multi Level Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

The social relations model (SRM; Kenny, 1994) explicitly proposes that leadership simultaneously operates at three levels of analysis: group, dyad, and individual (perceiver and target). With this model, researchers can empirically determine the amount of variance at each level as well as those factors that explain variance at these different levels. This chapter shows how the SRM can be used to address many theoretically important questions in the study of leadership and can be used to advance both the theory of and research in leadership. First, based on analysis of leadership ratings from seven studies, we find that there is substantial agreement (i.e., target variance) about who in the group is the leader and little or no reciprocity in the perceptions of leadership. We then consider correlations of leadership perceptions. In one analysis, we examine the correlations between task-oriented and socioemotional leadership. In another analysis, we examine the effect of gender and gender composition on the perception of leadership. We also explore how self-ratings of leadership differ from member perceptions of leadership. Finally, we discuss how the model can be estimated using conventional software.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用社会关系模型对领导力进行成分分析
社会关系模型;Kenny(1994)明确提出,领导力在三个分析层面同时运作:群体、双元和个人(感知者和目标)。有了这个模型,研究人员可以根据经验确定每个水平上的方差量,以及解释这些不同水平上方差的因素。本章展示了SRM如何用于解决领导力研究中许多理论上重要的问题,并可用于推进领导力的理论和研究。首先,基于对七项研究的领导力评价的分析,我们发现,对于团队中谁是领导者,存在实质性的一致(即目标方差),并且在领导力感知方面很少或没有互惠。然后我们考虑领导力感知的相关性。在一项分析中,我们研究了任务导向型领导和社会情感型领导之间的相关性。在另一项分析中,我们考察了性别和性别构成对领导力感知的影响。我们还探讨了领导力的自我评价与成员对领导力的认知之间的差异。最后,我们讨论了如何使用传统的软件来估计模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Multi-Level Analysis of the Upper-Echelons Model Thoughts on studying leadership in natural contexts Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership: An examination of multi-level influences on emergence and performance A componential analysis of leadership using the social relations model Creativity and cognitive processes: Multi-level linkages between individual and team cognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1