‘Popish Pelagianism’ or the Work of Divine Providence?

Joseph Wood
{"title":"‘Popish Pelagianism’ or the Work of Divine Providence?","authors":"Joseph Wood","doi":"10.1163/27725472-09304004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Responding to John Piper’s book, Providence (2020), and building on the work of Howard Snyder, this article articulates a Wesleyan-Arminian theology of ‘prevenient grace’. Highlighting Philippians 2:12–13, prevenient grace is articulated as a theological concept, rooted in the Bible, clearly expressed in the writings of James Arminius and made more widely accessible by the teaching of John Wesley. The theology of prevenient grace has been debated through the centuries and continues to be a primary point of distinction between those who would align their thinking to John Calvin (and Calvinism), in opposition to those who align with the teachings of John Wesley (and Wesleyan/Arminianism). From the perspective of God’s providence, the article identifies the slight, yet profound, difference between irresistible and prevenient grace. It argues that the caricature of Arminius’s, and therefore, Wesley’s teaching as Pelagian is unfounded. It concludes with suggestions of how the theology of prevenient grace offers a helpful framework for pastoral care.","PeriodicalId":355176,"journal":{"name":"Evangelical Quarterly","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evangelical Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725472-09304004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Responding to John Piper’s book, Providence (2020), and building on the work of Howard Snyder, this article articulates a Wesleyan-Arminian theology of ‘prevenient grace’. Highlighting Philippians 2:12–13, prevenient grace is articulated as a theological concept, rooted in the Bible, clearly expressed in the writings of James Arminius and made more widely accessible by the teaching of John Wesley. The theology of prevenient grace has been debated through the centuries and continues to be a primary point of distinction between those who would align their thinking to John Calvin (and Calvinism), in opposition to those who align with the teachings of John Wesley (and Wesleyan/Arminianism). From the perspective of God’s providence, the article identifies the slight, yet profound, difference between irresistible and prevenient grace. It argues that the caricature of Arminius’s, and therefore, Wesley’s teaching as Pelagian is unfounded. It concludes with suggestions of how the theology of prevenient grace offers a helpful framework for pastoral care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“教皇的伯拉纠主义”还是“天意的杰作”?
回应约翰派珀的书,普罗维登斯(2020),并以霍华德斯奈德的工作为基础,这篇文章阐述了卫斯理-阿民念主义的“先前恩典”神学。强调腓立比书2:12-13,先在恩典是一个神学概念,根植于圣经,在詹姆斯·亚米念的著作中明确表达,并通过约翰·卫斯理的教导得到更广泛的理解。先有恩典的神学已经争论了几个世纪,并继续成为那些将他们的思想与约翰·加尔文(和加尔文主义)保持一致的人与那些与约翰·卫斯理(和卫斯理/阿米念主义)的教义保持一致的人之间的主要区别。从神的旨意的角度,本文指出了不可抗拒的恩典和预先的恩典之间的细微而深刻的区别。它认为,讽刺阿民念的,因此,韦斯利的教学,作为伯拉纠是没有根据的。最后,它提出了先在恩典神学如何为教牧关怀提供一个有益的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Conversation between a Muslim and a Christian, by Peter Barnes and Mohamad Younes ‘You Never Stop Working’ From Creation to Abraham: Further Studies in Genesis 1–11, by John Day What Hath Darwin to Do with Scripture? Comparing the Conceptual Worlds of the Bible and Evolution, by Dru Johnson Establishing Recapitulation as a Unique and Fully-Fledged Atonement Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1