Remerging As A Global Power? Rethinking “New Qing History” From The Relationship Between “Qing” And “China”

Jiayi Zhang
{"title":"Remerging As A Global Power? Rethinking “New Qing History” From The Relationship Between “Qing” And “China”","authors":"Jiayi Zhang","doi":"10.55662/ajmrr.2022.3203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China has emerged as one of the 21st century’s most confident and consequential nations. From the Belt and Road Initiative to the Health Silk Road, China has proactively engaged with Eurasian countries and successfully projected its leadership abroad. Up to this point, the question left unanswered is, is this China’s debut as a global power? As it is critical to take note of the complexity of China’s rise, this article approaches the issue from a historical perspective and interrogates the role of the Manchurian’s rule over China beginning in the 17th century. By revisiting the rise of China more than 400 years ago from the lens of “New Qing History”, this paper argues that continuity can be found between the Qing empire and the contemporary rise of China as a global geopolitical power. Different from most Chinese scholars’ emphasis on Qing’s completion of the “grand unification (da yitong)”, “New Qing History” highlights Qing’s distinctiveness and the utilization of archival materials written in the Manchu language. There have been heated discussions on the topic, yet few of them approached the issue from the relationship between “Qing” and “China”. Supported by original archival materials written in Manchu language, this article explores the different receptions of “New Qing History” in Chinese and Western academia based on scholars’ understanding of the relationship between “Qing” and “China”. It further advocates a fluid understanding of ethnic identity in China as well as the so-called “Chineseness” in contrast to the conventional essentialist perception. By incorporating China into global history, this article aims to provide a new perspective in understanding contemporary China’s emergence as a global power and its state policies towards ethnic minorities.","PeriodicalId":348282,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Review","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55662/ajmrr.2022.3203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China has emerged as one of the 21st century’s most confident and consequential nations. From the Belt and Road Initiative to the Health Silk Road, China has proactively engaged with Eurasian countries and successfully projected its leadership abroad. Up to this point, the question left unanswered is, is this China’s debut as a global power? As it is critical to take note of the complexity of China’s rise, this article approaches the issue from a historical perspective and interrogates the role of the Manchurian’s rule over China beginning in the 17th century. By revisiting the rise of China more than 400 years ago from the lens of “New Qing History”, this paper argues that continuity can be found between the Qing empire and the contemporary rise of China as a global geopolitical power. Different from most Chinese scholars’ emphasis on Qing’s completion of the “grand unification (da yitong)”, “New Qing History” highlights Qing’s distinctiveness and the utilization of archival materials written in the Manchu language. There have been heated discussions on the topic, yet few of them approached the issue from the relationship between “Qing” and “China”. Supported by original archival materials written in Manchu language, this article explores the different receptions of “New Qing History” in Chinese and Western academia based on scholars’ understanding of the relationship between “Qing” and “China”. It further advocates a fluid understanding of ethnic identity in China as well as the so-called “Chineseness” in contrast to the conventional essentialist perception. By incorporating China into global history, this article aims to provide a new perspective in understanding contemporary China’s emergence as a global power and its state policies towards ethnic minorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新成为全球大国?从“清”与“中国”的关系再看“新清史”
中国已成为21世纪最自信、最重要的国家之一。从“一带一路”倡议到“健康丝绸之路”,中国积极与欧亚国家交往,成功对外展示领导力。到目前为止,没有回答的问题是,这是中国作为全球大国的首次亮相吗?注意到中国崛起的复杂性是至关重要的,本文从历史的角度来探讨这个问题,并对17世纪开始的满洲人对中国的统治所起的作用进行了质疑。通过从“新清史”的角度重新审视400多年前中国的崛起,本文认为清朝与当代中国作为全球地缘政治大国的崛起之间存在连续性。与大多数中国学者强调清朝完成了“大一统”不同,《新清史》突出了清朝的独特性和对满文档案资料的利用。关于这个话题的讨论一直很激烈,但很少有人从“清”与“中国”的关系来看待这个问题。本文以满文原始档案资料为支撑,根据学者对“清”与“中国”关系的理解,探讨中西方学术界对“新清史”的不同接受。它进一步提倡对中国的民族认同以及所谓的“中国性”的流动理解,与传统的本质主义观念形成鲜明对比。通过将中国纳入全球历史,本文旨在为理解当代中国作为全球大国的崛起及其对少数民族的国家政策提供一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Impact and Challenges of English Medium Instruction in Saudi Arabian STEM Programs: A Comprehensive Review Exploring Performalism: An In-Depth Analysis of Architecture’s Performative Dimension and its Relevance in Contemporary Discourse Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Review: A Study Revisiting the Development of China and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Relations under the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Paper Bridge to Japan: Reviewing the Relevance of Manga in Spreading Japanese Cultural Identity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1