A preliminary study on a novel approach to the assessment of the sample volume length and registration accuracy in PW Doppler quality control

Giorgia Fiori, A. Scorza, M. Schmid, J. Galo, S. Conforto, S. Sciuto
{"title":"A preliminary study on a novel approach to the assessment of the sample volume length and registration accuracy in PW Doppler quality control","authors":"Giorgia Fiori, A. Scorza, M. Schmid, J. Galo, S. Conforto, S. Sciuto","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sample volume (SV) in PW Doppler is usually characterized by two main factors, i.e., sample volume size and range gate registration accuracy, which have been included among the recommended Quality Control (QC) Doppler tests commonly proposed in the literature. However, most of the studies focusing on these two factors date back to the last years of the XX century. In this context, the present preliminary study proposes and investigates a novel approach for the automatic analysis of faults in both sample volume length and registration accuracy through the post-processing of PW Doppler spectrograms. In particular, a Velocity Profile Discrepancy Index (VPDI) has been defined and assessed under the hypothesis of laminar flow and parabolic velocity profiles in the examined conduct. According to the definition hereby proposed, VPDI is expected to be as close as possible to 0 for a good agreement between theoretical and measured velocity profile, therefore suggesting that the displayed PW spectrogram is not affected by significant SV error sources. A single ultrasound (US) system of intermediate technology level, equipped with three probe models, has been used to acquire the PW spectrograms obtained for six different SV positions (i.e., six sample volume depths) with respect to the tube diameter of a Doppler flow phantom. Tests have been repeated for all the US probes operating at two Doppler frequencies each. Based on the preliminary promising outcomes, further studies may be needed that include (i) increasing the number of diagnostic systems, (ii) exploring different US system settings, (iii) improving the test protocol to estimate the two error sources separately.","PeriodicalId":106228,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sample volume (SV) in PW Doppler is usually characterized by two main factors, i.e., sample volume size and range gate registration accuracy, which have been included among the recommended Quality Control (QC) Doppler tests commonly proposed in the literature. However, most of the studies focusing on these two factors date back to the last years of the XX century. In this context, the present preliminary study proposes and investigates a novel approach for the automatic analysis of faults in both sample volume length and registration accuracy through the post-processing of PW Doppler spectrograms. In particular, a Velocity Profile Discrepancy Index (VPDI) has been defined and assessed under the hypothesis of laminar flow and parabolic velocity profiles in the examined conduct. According to the definition hereby proposed, VPDI is expected to be as close as possible to 0 for a good agreement between theoretical and measured velocity profile, therefore suggesting that the displayed PW spectrogram is not affected by significant SV error sources. A single ultrasound (US) system of intermediate technology level, equipped with three probe models, has been used to acquire the PW spectrograms obtained for six different SV positions (i.e., six sample volume depths) with respect to the tube diameter of a Doppler flow phantom. Tests have been repeated for all the US probes operating at two Doppler frequencies each. Based on the preliminary promising outcomes, further studies may be needed that include (i) increasing the number of diagnostic systems, (ii) exploring different US system settings, (iii) improving the test protocol to estimate the two error sources separately.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PW多普勒质量控制中样本体积长度和配准精度评估新方法的初步研究
PW多普勒的样本量(SV)通常由两个主要因素表征,即样本量大小和量程门配准精度,这两个因素已被纳入文献中通常提出的推荐的质量控制(QC)多普勒测试。然而,大多数关注这两个因素的研究都可以追溯到20世纪的最后几年。在此背景下,本初步研究提出并探讨了一种通过对PW多普勒谱图进行后处理,在样本体积长度和配准精度两方面自动分析故障的新方法。特别地,在层流和抛物速度分布的假设下,定义和评估了速度分布差异指数(VPDI)。根据本文提出的定义,为了使理论速度剖面与实测速度剖面很好地吻合,VPDI应尽可能接近于0,这表明显示的PW谱图不受显著SV误差源的影响。采用中等技术水平的单超声(US)系统,配备三种探头模型,获得了相对于多普勒流模管径的六个不同SV位置(即六个样品体积深度)的PW谱图。所有在两个多普勒频率下工作的美国探测器都进行了重复测试。基于初步的有希望的结果,可能需要进一步的研究,包括(i)增加诊断系统的数量,(ii)探索不同的美国系统设置,(iii)改进测试方案以分别估计两个错误源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time and Frequency domain analysis of APB muscles Abduction in adult dominant hand using surface electromyography signals Comparison of Noise Reduction Techniques for Dysarthric Speech Recognition Effects of ROI positioning on the measurement of engineered muscle tissue contractility with an optical tracking method Atrial Fibrillation Detection by Means of Edge Computing on Wearable Device: A Feasibility Assessment Unraveling the biological meaning of radiomic features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1