On the Ethical Issues of Gene-enhancement in Different Stages of Human Development

Jingtao Jiang
{"title":"On the Ethical Issues of Gene-enhancement in Different Stages of Human Development","authors":"Jingtao Jiang","doi":"10.11648/J.ASH.20210702.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ethics of human enhancement technology are highly controversial. The purpose of this paper is to provide an ethical justification for the genetic enhancement technology and then extend it to the ethical feasibility of other human enhancement technologies. According to the customs of most countries in the world, the age of 18 is generally regarded as the threshold of adulthood. Non-adults under 18 can be divided into the embryonic period from the fertilized egg to the eighth week and the growing period from the ninth week to the age of 18. Genetic enhancement in embryonic period has been criticized by a series of ethical charges with \"germline change\" as the core. Although genetic enhancement in the growing period avoids the critical opinion of \"germline change\", it is still criticized by a series of ethical charges with \"human-nature change\" as the core. Genetic enhancement in the adulthood will successfully avoid the two fatal charges of “germline change” and “human-nature change”, while responding well to other ethical charges. The conclusion of this paper is that adult gene enhancement is ethically feasible, and further application of other adult human enhancement techniques is also ethically feasible.","PeriodicalId":300225,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sciences and Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.ASH.20210702.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ethics of human enhancement technology are highly controversial. The purpose of this paper is to provide an ethical justification for the genetic enhancement technology and then extend it to the ethical feasibility of other human enhancement technologies. According to the customs of most countries in the world, the age of 18 is generally regarded as the threshold of adulthood. Non-adults under 18 can be divided into the embryonic period from the fertilized egg to the eighth week and the growing period from the ninth week to the age of 18. Genetic enhancement in embryonic period has been criticized by a series of ethical charges with "germline change" as the core. Although genetic enhancement in the growing period avoids the critical opinion of "germline change", it is still criticized by a series of ethical charges with "human-nature change" as the core. Genetic enhancement in the adulthood will successfully avoid the two fatal charges of “germline change” and “human-nature change”, while responding well to other ethical charges. The conclusion of this paper is that adult gene enhancement is ethically feasible, and further application of other adult human enhancement techniques is also ethically feasible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试论人类不同发展阶段基因增强的伦理问题
人类增强技术的伦理争议很大。本文的目的是为基因增强技术提供一个伦理理由,然后将其扩展到其他人类增强技术的伦理可行性。根据世界上大多数国家的习俗,18岁通常被视为成年的门槛。18岁以下的非成人可分为受精卵至8周的胚胎期和9周至18岁的生长期。胚胎期基因增强一直受到以“种系改变”为核心的一系列伦理指控的批评。生长期的基因增强虽然避免了“种系改变”的批判意见,但仍受到以“人-自然改变”为核心的一系列伦理指控的批判。成年期的基因增强将成功避免“种系改变”和“人性改变”这两种致命的指控,同时也能很好地应对其他伦理指控。本文的结论是,成人基因增强在伦理上是可行的,进一步应用其他成人基因增强技术在伦理上也是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overview of the Methods of Collecting Algerian Documents at the Beginning of the Second Half of the 19th Century: The “Algerian Historical Society” as a Model Rural Household Food Security Status: The Case of Jimma Rare District, Horo Guduru Wollega, Western Ethiopia Freud's Contributions to Education: Authority and Seduction in the Pedagogical Relationship Animation and YouTube as Alternative and Counterhegemonic Digital Public Sphere in Zimbabwe Intertextuality and Dialogue Logic of Literary Texts with Hezar O Yek Shab (Case Study of Makkaran's Story)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1