Team structure and quality improvement in collaborative environments

N. Manukyan, M. Eppstein, J. Horbar
{"title":"Team structure and quality improvement in collaborative environments","authors":"N. Manukyan, M. Eppstein, J. Horbar","doi":"10.1109/CTS.2013.6567282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teams comprising diverse individuals have been shown to increase the collective creativity in jointly solving problems. However, in contexts where the purpose of collaboration is knowledge diffusion in complex environments, it is not clear whether team diversity will help or hinder effective learning. For example, in organized quality improvement collaboratives (QICs), healthcare institutions exchange information on clinical practices and outcomes with the aim of improving health outcomes at their own institutions. However, what works in one hospital may not work in others with different local contexts, due to non-linear interactions among various treatments and practices. While there is limited evidence that some QICs have resulted in improved care, it is not yet clear what factors contribute to the effectiveness of these team collaborations. In this study, we use an agent-based model to study how different strategies of team formation, including team diversity and size, affect quality improvement in simulated collaborative environments. We show that, in this context, teams comprising similar individuals outperform those with more diverse teams, and that this advantage increases with the complexity of the landscape and level of noise in assessing fitness. Furthermore, we show that larger teams of relatively homogeneous agents perform better than smaller teams, and that effective learning through team collaborations is dependent on the level of knowledge of team members' performance levels. Thus, our results suggest that groups of similar hospitals should collaborate as a single team and openly share detailed information regarding their clinical practices and outcomes. To facilitate this, we propose a virtual collaboration framework that would allow hospitals to efficiently identify potentially better practices in use at other institutions similar to theirs, without any institutions having to sacrifice the privacy of their own data. Our results may also have implications for other types of data-driven diffusive learning, such as in personalized medicine.","PeriodicalId":256633,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2013.6567282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Teams comprising diverse individuals have been shown to increase the collective creativity in jointly solving problems. However, in contexts where the purpose of collaboration is knowledge diffusion in complex environments, it is not clear whether team diversity will help or hinder effective learning. For example, in organized quality improvement collaboratives (QICs), healthcare institutions exchange information on clinical practices and outcomes with the aim of improving health outcomes at their own institutions. However, what works in one hospital may not work in others with different local contexts, due to non-linear interactions among various treatments and practices. While there is limited evidence that some QICs have resulted in improved care, it is not yet clear what factors contribute to the effectiveness of these team collaborations. In this study, we use an agent-based model to study how different strategies of team formation, including team diversity and size, affect quality improvement in simulated collaborative environments. We show that, in this context, teams comprising similar individuals outperform those with more diverse teams, and that this advantage increases with the complexity of the landscape and level of noise in assessing fitness. Furthermore, we show that larger teams of relatively homogeneous agents perform better than smaller teams, and that effective learning through team collaborations is dependent on the level of knowledge of team members' performance levels. Thus, our results suggest that groups of similar hospitals should collaborate as a single team and openly share detailed information regarding their clinical practices and outcomes. To facilitate this, we propose a virtual collaboration framework that would allow hospitals to efficiently identify potentially better practices in use at other institutions similar to theirs, without any institutions having to sacrifice the privacy of their own data. Our results may also have implications for other types of data-driven diffusive learning, such as in personalized medicine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协作环境中的团队结构和质量改进
由不同个人组成的团队已被证明可以提高共同解决问题的集体创造力。然而,在协作的目的是在复杂环境中传播知识的情况下,团队多样性是否有助于或阻碍有效的学习尚不清楚。例如,在有组织的质量改进协作(qic)中,卫生保健机构交换关于临床实践和结果的信息,目的是改善本机构的卫生结果。然而,由于各种治疗和实践之间的非线性相互作用,在一家医院有效的方法可能不适用于其他具有不同地方背景的医院。虽然有有限的证据表明一些质量保证中心改善了护理,但尚不清楚哪些因素有助于这些团队合作的有效性。在本研究中,我们使用一个基于主体的模型来研究在模拟协作环境中不同的团队形成策略(包括团队多样性和团队规模)对质量改进的影响。我们的研究表明,在这种情况下,由相似个体组成的团队的表现优于由更多样化的团队组成的团队,而且这种优势随着环境的复杂性和评估适应性时的噪音水平而增加。此外,我们还表明,由相对同质的代理组成的较大团队比较小的团队表现得更好,并且通过团队协作进行的有效学习取决于团队成员绩效水平的知识水平。因此,我们的研究结果表明,类似的医院集团应该作为一个单一的团队合作,并公开分享有关其临床实践和结果的详细信息。为了促进这一点,我们提出了一个虚拟协作框架,该框架将允许医院有效地识别其他类似机构使用的潜在更好的实践,而任何机构都不必牺牲自己的数据隐私。我们的研究结果也可能对其他类型的数据驱动的扩散学习有启示,比如个性化医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the contingency of robot feedback on HRI Big data: A review Methods of effective information exchange in the virtual world Application of process mining techniques for innovation analysis and support Incorporating a reusable human robot interface with an Auction Behavior-Based Robotic Architecture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1