Bridging the Mental Health RTI Theory to Practice Gap: Preliminary Investigation into Current Practices, Facilitators and Barriers

D. Foley
{"title":"Bridging the Mental Health RTI Theory to Practice Gap: Preliminary Investigation into Current Practices, Facilitators and Barriers","authors":"D. Foley","doi":"10.20533/ijtie.2047.0533.2019.0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twenty-plus percent (8 to 12 million) of US school-age youth have moderate to severe emotional, behavioral and mental health problems. Eighty percent receive no mental health services. For the few who do receive it, the vast majority of mental health services are school-based. Nationaland state-level initiatives and the literature regarding mental health RTI practices provide conceptual frameworks but lack research-based guidelines for schools to implement and evaluate interventions or monitor progress. This study sought to begin bridging the theory to practice gap for best practice guidelines and procedures for providing tiered systems of school-based mental health supports for children and adolescents by identifying baseline current practices, facilitators and barriers. Preliminary results of a state-wide survey of 174 psychologists found that only 16% of schools engaged in universal mental health screening. Generally, data regarding risk or documented mental health concerns was not systematically gathered or maintained for students not services or accommodations for mental health concerns via IEPs or 504 plans. Facilitators and barriers to mental health RTI centered on available resources to support students, communication, expertise and leadership. Next step recommendations for data collection, analysis and monitoring, and regulation-compliant communication processes are offered.","PeriodicalId":106634,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20533/ijtie.2047.0533.2019.0163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twenty-plus percent (8 to 12 million) of US school-age youth have moderate to severe emotional, behavioral and mental health problems. Eighty percent receive no mental health services. For the few who do receive it, the vast majority of mental health services are school-based. Nationaland state-level initiatives and the literature regarding mental health RTI practices provide conceptual frameworks but lack research-based guidelines for schools to implement and evaluate interventions or monitor progress. This study sought to begin bridging the theory to practice gap for best practice guidelines and procedures for providing tiered systems of school-based mental health supports for children and adolescents by identifying baseline current practices, facilitators and barriers. Preliminary results of a state-wide survey of 174 psychologists found that only 16% of schools engaged in universal mental health screening. Generally, data regarding risk or documented mental health concerns was not systematically gathered or maintained for students not services or accommodations for mental health concerns via IEPs or 504 plans. Facilitators and barriers to mental health RTI centered on available resources to support students, communication, expertise and leadership. Next step recommendations for data collection, analysis and monitoring, and regulation-compliant communication processes are offered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥合心理健康RTI理论与实践的差距:对当前实践、促进因素和障碍的初步调查
超过20%(800万到1200万)的美国学龄青少年有中度到严重的情绪、行为和精神健康问题。80%的人没有接受心理健康服务。对于少数接受心理健康服务的人来说,绝大多数心理健康服务都是以学校为基础的。国家和州一级的倡议以及关于心理健康RTI实践的文献提供了概念性框架,但缺乏基于研究的指导方针,以供学校实施和评估干预措施或监测进展。本研究试图通过确定当前的基本做法、促进因素和障碍,开始弥合理论与实践之间的差距,为为儿童和青少年提供基于学校的心理健康支持分层系统的最佳实践指南和程序。对174名心理学家进行的全州调查的初步结果发现,只有16%的学校参与了普遍的心理健康筛查。一般来说,没有通过iep或504计划系统地收集或保存关于学生心理健康问题的风险或记录的数据。促进和障碍心理健康RTI集中在现有资源,以支持学生,沟通,专业知识和领导。下一步,对数据收集、分析和监测以及符合法规的通信流程提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interteach - A Total Investigation Study of Swedish Schools Regarding the Education of Pupils with Intellectual Disabilities Developing Inclusion: A Participatory Action Research of Primary Education for Students with Invisible Disabilities in Thailand A Systematic Approaches for People with Autism to Develop Logical Thinking Process with a Successful Case Crisis Management in Education: A Comparative Case Study of a Special School and a Standardized School in Greece Successful Inclusion of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1