{"title":"Il “tragico” disdegno di Farinata degli Uberti nel canto X dell’Inferno di Dante","authors":"Maria Maślanka-Soro","doi":"10.15804/iw.2021.12.2.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Dante’s Inferno presents an essentially non-tragic view of reality based on the Christian concept of Man in his historical and eschatological aspect. Nonetheless, some of Dante’s episodes, like the one of Farinata degli Uberti, appear to contain a certain element of tragedy because of the virtues marking the characters involved, which endow them with a certain nobility, giving rise to an air of tragedy. To examine the nature of this “tragic” quality, I shall invoke Erich Auerbach’s concept of figural realism as applied to Dante’s masterpiece. A character’s life on earth is a prefiguration of his life after death, the fulfilment of his earthly existence concluding his earthly deeds. The soul’s fate post mortem bespeaks the quintessence of its life, the tangible sign of which is its contrappasso. The chief conflict takes place between the character and his fulfilment, but it also generates further conflicts: between the soul’s past on earth and its current condition in Hell; between the qualities that marked it in the past that could objectively be considered virtuous, and its current status amongst the damned, and others. Only in the eyes of sinners are these conflicts seen as tragic, but not from the point of view of Dante the Author, who discredits these conflicts with a variety of rhetorical and stylistic devices. I endeavour to explain the seemingly tragic quality in Farinata degli Uberti, one of the “magnanimous” spirits confined in Hell. At first glance he may seem reminiscent of the heroes of Greek tragedy, but on closer scrutiny his “magnanimity” takes on a sinister quality, and this is how Dante wants his readers to see the connection between Farinata’s perverse political commitment verging on fanaticism, and his sin of heresy, to which Farinata seems to turn a blind eye.","PeriodicalId":424702,"journal":{"name":"Italica Wratislaviensia","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italica Wratislaviensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/iw.2021.12.2.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
: Dante’s Inferno presents an essentially non-tragic view of reality based on the Christian concept of Man in his historical and eschatological aspect. Nonetheless, some of Dante’s episodes, like the one of Farinata degli Uberti, appear to contain a certain element of tragedy because of the virtues marking the characters involved, which endow them with a certain nobility, giving rise to an air of tragedy. To examine the nature of this “tragic” quality, I shall invoke Erich Auerbach’s concept of figural realism as applied to Dante’s masterpiece. A character’s life on earth is a prefiguration of his life after death, the fulfilment of his earthly existence concluding his earthly deeds. The soul’s fate post mortem bespeaks the quintessence of its life, the tangible sign of which is its contrappasso. The chief conflict takes place between the character and his fulfilment, but it also generates further conflicts: between the soul’s past on earth and its current condition in Hell; between the qualities that marked it in the past that could objectively be considered virtuous, and its current status amongst the damned, and others. Only in the eyes of sinners are these conflicts seen as tragic, but not from the point of view of Dante the Author, who discredits these conflicts with a variety of rhetorical and stylistic devices. I endeavour to explain the seemingly tragic quality in Farinata degli Uberti, one of the “magnanimous” spirits confined in Hell. At first glance he may seem reminiscent of the heroes of Greek tragedy, but on closer scrutiny his “magnanimity” takes on a sinister quality, and this is how Dante wants his readers to see the connection between Farinata’s perverse political commitment verging on fanaticism, and his sin of heresy, to which Farinata seems to turn a blind eye.
但丁的《地狱篇》呈现了一种本质上非悲剧性的现实性观点,这种观点是基于基督教的历史观和末世论观。尽管如此,但丁的一些章节,比如法里娜塔·德格里·乌伯提,似乎包含了某种悲剧的元素,因为这些人物的美德赋予了他们某种高贵,产生了一种悲剧的气氛。为了研究这种“悲剧”性质的本质,我将引用埃里希·奥尔巴赫的形象现实主义概念,将其应用于但丁的杰作。一个人物在世的生活是他死后生活的预示,是他现世存在的完成,是他现世行为的总结。灵魂死后的命运反映了其生命的精髓,其有形的标志是它的对位。主要的冲突发生在人物和他的成就之间,但它也产生了进一步的冲突:灵魂在地球上的过去和它在地狱里的现状;在过去被客观认为是美德的特质之间,和它现在被诅咒的状态之间,等等。只有在罪人的眼中,这些冲突才被视为悲剧,但不是从作者但丁的角度来看,他用各种修辞和文体手段来诋毁这些冲突。我试图解释Farinata degli Uberti身上看似悲剧性的特质,Farinata degli Uberti是被囚禁在地狱里的“宽宏大量”的灵魂之一。乍一看,他似乎让人想起希腊悲剧中的英雄,但仔细一看,他的“宽宏大量”带有一种邪恶的品质,这就是但丁想让读者看到法里纳塔近乎狂热的反常政治承诺与他的异端罪之间的联系,法里纳塔似乎对此视而不见。