Facial Profile Attractiveness: Comparison Amongst Orthodontists and other Dental Specialists Ranking of Treated Profiles with the Twin Block Appliances

Ankita A. Sawant, S. Mani
{"title":"Facial Profile Attractiveness: Comparison Amongst Orthodontists and other Dental Specialists Ranking of Treated Profiles with the Twin Block Appliances","authors":"Ankita A. Sawant, S. Mani","doi":"10.17795/IJO-3748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this study was to compare facial profile attractiveness changes of patients treated with twin block appliance assessed by orthodontist and other dental specialist. \nMaterial and methods: The patient sample comprised 10 patients who undergo orthodontics treatment with Twin Block appliance. Triplets of facial profile photographs of the patients were randomly divided into two sets (before T0, after treatment T1). Two groups selected: 10 orthodontist and 10 dental specialists from different other branches (Excluding oral maxillofacial surgeons) in Rural Dental College were selected. Each judge independently ranked both sets of photographs using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with an interval of 1 week between ratings. \nResult: On average, both orthodontists and other dental specialist found an improvement in facial profile attractiveness through Twin Block appliances treatment (VAS- T0-T1=1.4 +/-3.2 cm). However, the individual perception of attractiveness varied greatly in the twogroups. For time periods (T0- T1), lower VAS ratings were given by other specialist than by orthodontists. \nConclusion: Other dental specialist rated facial profiles more critically than orthodontist. Twin block therapy in patients generally improves profile attractiveness, which is appreciated by all dentists.","PeriodicalId":282372,"journal":{"name":"Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/IJO-3748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare facial profile attractiveness changes of patients treated with twin block appliance assessed by orthodontist and other dental specialist. Material and methods: The patient sample comprised 10 patients who undergo orthodontics treatment with Twin Block appliance. Triplets of facial profile photographs of the patients were randomly divided into two sets (before T0, after treatment T1). Two groups selected: 10 orthodontist and 10 dental specialists from different other branches (Excluding oral maxillofacial surgeons) in Rural Dental College were selected. Each judge independently ranked both sets of photographs using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with an interval of 1 week between ratings. Result: On average, both orthodontists and other dental specialist found an improvement in facial profile attractiveness through Twin Block appliances treatment (VAS- T0-T1=1.4 +/-3.2 cm). However, the individual perception of attractiveness varied greatly in the twogroups. For time periods (T0- T1), lower VAS ratings were given by other specialist than by orthodontists. Conclusion: Other dental specialist rated facial profiles more critically than orthodontist. Twin block therapy in patients generally improves profile attractiveness, which is appreciated by all dentists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面部轮廓吸引力:正畸医生和其他牙科专家使用双块矫治器治疗的面部轮廓排名的比较
本研究的目的是比较经正畸医师和其他牙科专家评估的双牙块矫治器治疗后患者面部吸引力的变化。材料和方法:患者样本包括10例使用Twin Block矫治器进行正畸治疗的患者。三组患者面部侧面照片随机分为两组(治疗前T0,治疗后T1)。选取两组:选取农村牙科学院不同专科(不含口腔颌面外科)的正畸医师10名和其他专科医师10名。每位评委使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)对两组照片进行独立评分,评分间隔为1周。结果:平均而言,正畸医师和其他牙科专科医师均发现Twin Block矫治器治疗后面部轮廓吸引力有所改善(VAS- T0-T1=1.4 +/-3.2 cm)。然而,两组人对吸引力的个人认知差异很大。对于时间段(T0- T1),其他专家给予的VAS评分低于正畸医生。结论:其他牙科专科医师对面部特征的评价高于正畸医师。双块治疗患者一般提高轮廓吸引力,这是赞赏所有牙医。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liquid-Supported Denture- A Boon To Flabby Ridges Denture Adhesives - A Literature Review Orthodontic Management of an Impacted Mandibular Canine in a 14 Years Old Kuwaiti Girl Facial Profile Attractiveness: Comparison Amongst Orthodontists and other Dental Specialists Ranking of Treated Profiles with the Twin Block Appliances Ameloblastic Carcinoma-Secondary Type, A Rare Case Report and Distinction from Malignant Ameloblastoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1